• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 VBLaST 样式裁剪任务:学习曲线研究。

Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1990-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0
PMID:29052071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5845471/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mastery of laparoscopic skills is essential in surgical practice and requires considerable time and effort to achieve. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST-PC) is a virtual simulator that was developed as a computerized version of the pattern cutting (PC) task in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) system. To establish convergent validity for the VBLaST-PC, we assessed trainees' learning curves using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method and compared them with those on the FLS.

METHODS

Twenty-four medical students were randomly assigned to an FLS training group, a VBLaST training group, or a control group. Fifteen training sessions, 30 min in duration per session per day, were conducted over 3 weeks. All subjects completed pretest, posttest, and retention test (2 weeks after posttest) on both the FLS and VBLaST simulators. Performance data, including time, error, FLS score, learning rate, learning plateau, and CUSUM score, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The learning curve for all trained subjects demonstrated increasing performance and a performance plateau. CUSUM analyses showed that five of the seven subjects reached the intermediate proficiency level but none reached the expert proficiency level after 150 practice trials. Performance was significantly improved after simulation training, but only in the assigned simulator. No significant decay of skills after 2 weeks of disuse was observed. Control subjects did not show any learning on the FLS simulator, but improved continually in the VBLaST simulator.

CONCLUSIONS

Although VBLaST- and FLS-trained subjects demonstrated similar learning rates and plateaus, the majority of subjects required more than 150 trials to achieve proficiency. Trained subjects demonstrated improved performance in only the assigned simulator, indicating specificity of training. The virtual simulator may provide better opportunities for learning, especially with limited training exposure.

摘要

背景

掌握腹腔镜技能对于外科实践至关重要,需要大量的时间和努力才能实现。Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST-PC) 是一种虚拟模拟器,是 Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) 系统中模式切割 (PC) 任务的计算机化版本。为了建立 VBLaST-PC 的收敛有效性,我们使用累积和 (CUSUM) 方法评估学员的学习曲线,并将其与 FLS 的学习曲线进行比较。

方法

24 名医学生被随机分配到 FLS 培训组、VBLaST 培训组或对照组。在 3 周内,每天进行 30 分钟的 15 次培训课程。所有受试者均在 FLS 和 VBLaST 模拟器上完成预测试、后测试和保留测试(后测试后 2 周)。分析了性能数据,包括时间、错误、FLS 分数、学习率、学习平台和 CUSUM 分数。

结果

所有接受培训的受试者的学习曲线均表现出性能的提高和平台的出现。CUSUM 分析显示,在 150 次练习后,有 5 名受试者达到了中级熟练水平,但没有一名达到专家熟练水平。模拟训练后,性能明显提高,但仅在分配的模拟器中。在 2 周的不用后,没有观察到技能明显下降。对照组在 FLS 模拟器上没有表现出任何学习,但在 VBLaST 模拟器上不断提高。

结论

尽管 VBLaST 和 FLS 训练的受试者表现出相似的学习率和平台,但大多数受试者需要超过 150 次试验才能达到熟练水平。训练有素的受试者仅在分配的模拟器中表现出更好的性能,表明培训的特异性。虚拟模拟器可能提供更好的学习机会,特别是在有限的培训暴露下。

相似文献

1
Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.验证 VBLaST 样式裁剪任务:学习曲线研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1990-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
2
Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.基于虚拟现实的裁剪模拟样片的融合验证和学习迁移研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5802-8. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
3
Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).描述 VBLaST-PT(©)(虚拟基础腹腔镜技能训练器)的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2932-5. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
4
Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator VBLaST-SS©.表征虚拟体内缝合模拟器VBLaST-SS©的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3135-3144. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07081-6. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.切割模式与结扎环虚拟腹腔镜训练器的初步评估
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):815-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
6
Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.VBLaST的验证:一项针对妇科外科医生的虚拟栓子转移任务
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(7):1271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator.验证一种虚拟的腔内缝合模拟器。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2468-2472. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6531-3. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
8
Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.VBLaST 栓子转移任务的验证:迈向替代训练标准的第一步。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2856-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3538-2. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
9
The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators.虚拟现实技术和力反馈在手术训练模拟器中的附加价值。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2288-92. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0453-2288.
10
Usefulness of virtual reality in assessment of medical student laparoscopic skill.虚拟现实在医学生腹腔镜技能评估中的实用性。
J Surg Res. 2017 May 1;211:191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.054. Epub 2016 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Learning Outcomes of Virtual Reality (VR) Simulators Using Haptic Feedback Versus Box Trainer (BT) in Laparoscopic Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在腹腔镜训练中比较使用触觉反馈的虚拟现实(VR)模拟器与箱式训练器(BT)的学习成果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 12;17(2):e78910. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78910. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Surgery and technical skill decay.手术及技术技能衰退。
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3399-3413. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002313.
3
A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves of Novices and Trainees to Achieve Proficiency in Laparoscopic Skills: Virtual Reality Simulator Versus Box Trainer.

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.切割模式与结扎环虚拟腹腔镜训练器的初步评估
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):815-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
2
Robotic thoracic surgery: technical considerations and learning curve for pulmonary resection.机器人胸腔手术:肺切除术的技术考虑和学习曲线。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2014 May;24(2):135-41, v. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.02.009.
3
Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.
新手和学员达到腹腔镜技能熟练程度的学习曲线的系统评价:虚拟现实模拟器与箱式训练器的比较
Cureus. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72923. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Results of single-incision distal biceps tendon repair for early-career upper-extremity surgeons.早期职业上肢外科医生单切口肱二头肌远端肌腱修复的结果
JSES Int. 2022 Oct 18;7(1):178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.09.013. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Exploring the activities and outcomes of digital teaching and learning of practical skills in higher education for the social and health care professions: a scoping review.探索高等教育中社会和医疗保健专业实践技能数字教学的活动与成果:一项范围综述
Discov Educ. 2023;2(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s44217-022-00022-x. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Learning rate of students detecting and annotating pediatric wrist fractures in supervised artificial intelligence dataset preparations.学生在监督人工智能数据集准备中检测和标注小儿腕部骨折的学习率。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276503. eCollection 2022.
7
Directed information flow during laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition dissociated skill level and medical simulation technology.腹腔镜手术技能习得过程中的定向信息流与技能水平及医学模拟技术相分离。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2022 Aug 25;7(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00138-7.
8
Training on a virtual reality cricothyroidotomy simulator improves skills and transfers to a simulated procedure.在虚拟现实环甲膜切开术模拟器上进行训练可提高技能,并能将技能迁移至模拟操作中。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Mar 1;7(1):e000826. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000826. eCollection 2022.
9
A machine learning approach to predict surgical learning curves.机器学习方法预测手术学习曲线。
Surgery. 2020 Feb;167(2):321-327. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
VBLaST 栓子转移任务的验证:迈向替代训练标准的第一步。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2856-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3538-2. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
4
Competence versus mastery: the time course for developing proficiency in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.能力与精通:胸腔镜辅助肺叶切除术熟练程度的发展过程。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;147(4):1150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.036. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
5
Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy.与电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术相关的学习曲线
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 May;1(1):47-50. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.04.05.
6
Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).描述 VBLaST-PT(©)(虚拟基础腹腔镜技能训练器)的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2932-5. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Development and validation of VBLaST-PT© : a virtual peg transfer simulator.VBLaST-PT©的开发与验证:一种虚拟植钉转移模拟器
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;184:24-30.
8
Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.一种虚拟打桩转移模拟器的面部和结构验证。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1721-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2664-y. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
9
Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement.微创心脏瓣膜手术学习曲线的跨越:一位外科医生采用右迷你开胸入路行主动脉瓣置换术的经验累积分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jun;41(6):1242-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr230. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery.手辅助腹腔镜结肠和直肠手术的技术熟练程度:确定达到精通需要多少病例。
Arch Surg. 2012 Apr;147(4):317-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.879. Epub 2011 Dec 19.