• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络造假:我能,所以我会吗?在线心理测试中的造假意图。

Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Australia.

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 May;16(5):364-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0271. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2012.0271
PMID:23574347
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether intentions to fake online (cyberfaking) or in pencil-and-paper psychological testing differ. Participants (N=154) completed online questionnaires measuring attitudes toward faking, perceived behavioral control over faking, subjective norms regarding faking, and intentions to fake in future psychological assessment, with online and pencil-and-paper test administration scenarios compared. Participants showed similar intentions toward cyberfaking and faking in pencil-and-paper testing. However, participants held more positive attitudes toward cyberfaking than faking offline, greater perceived behavioral control over cyberfaking than offline faking, and more favorable subjective norms toward cyberfaking compared to offline faking. Analysis via multiple regression revealed that more positive attitudes toward cyberfaking, greater perceived behavioral control over cyberfaking, and more favorable subjective norms regarding cyberfaking were significantly related to the intention to cyberfake. In addition, more positive attitudes toward faking offline and greater perceived behavioral control over faking offline were significantly related to the intention to fake in offline tests. Overall, results indicated a similar pattern of relationship in the prediction of intentions to engage in faking regardless of the test administration modality scenario. Subjective norm, however, was not a significant predictor for faking offline. Future research could aim to include a behavioral faking outcome measure, as well as examine intentions to cyberfake in specific scenarios (for example, faking good or faking bad).

摘要

本研究旨在探究在网络环境下(网络造假)或在纸笔心理测试中进行造假意图是否存在差异。参与者(N=154)完成了在线问卷,用于测量对造假的态度、对造假行为控制的感知、关于造假的主观规范以及未来心理评估中的造假意向,比较了在线和纸笔测试的管理场景。参与者在网络造假和纸笔测试造假方面表现出相似的意图。然而,参与者对网络造假的态度比线下造假更积极,对网络造假的感知行为控制比对线下造假更强烈,对网络造假的主观规范比对线下造假更有利。通过多元回归分析表明,对网络造假的态度越积极、对网络造假的感知行为控制越强、对网络造假的主观规范越有利,与网络造假意图显著相关。此外,对线下造假的态度越积极、对线下造假的感知行为控制越强,与线下测试造假意图显著相关。总体而言,无论测试管理模式如何,研究结果表明,在预测造假意图方面存在相似的关系模式。然而,主观规范并不是线下造假的显著预测因素。未来的研究可以旨在纳入行为造假的结果衡量标准,并检查在特定场景下(例如,造假好或造假坏)的网络造假意图。

相似文献

1
Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.网络造假:我能,所以我会吗?在线心理测试中的造假意图。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 May;16(5):364-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0271. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
2
Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.自我耗竭或处于正常状态时非指导性生物行为评估测试(BIAT)的伪装:对大脑和行为的不同影响
BMC Neurosci. 2016 May 3;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0249-8.
3
Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.自我报告式人格测试中伪装行为的校正
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Oct;56(5):582-91. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12231. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
4
Detection of faking on role-play tests of assertiveness.在自信角色扮演测试中对伪装行为的检测。
Psychol Rep. 1994 Apr;74(2):367-70. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.367.
5
The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping.隐性激励造假对兴奋剂态度的显性和隐性测量的影响:当运动员想要假装对兴奋剂持更消极态度时。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0118507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118507. eCollection 2015.
6
Some feelings are more important: cognitive attitudes, affective attitudes, anticipated affect, and blood donation.有些感受更为重要:认知态度、情感态度、预期情感和献血。
Health Psychol. 2013 Mar;32(3):264-72. doi: 10.1037/a0028500. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management.自我欺骗与印象管理的神经关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;67:159-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.非认知测量中伪装行为的差异。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Oct;85(5):812-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812.
9
Does multidimensional forced-choice prevent faking? Comparing the susceptibility of the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format to faking.多维迫选是否能防止伪装?比较多维迫选格式和评分量表格式对伪装的敏感性。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Feb;33(2):156-170. doi: 10.1037/pas0000971. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Intraindividual Variability of Sleep Opportunity Attitudes, Perceived Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control, and Intentions.个体内睡眠机会态度、感知规范、感知行为控制和意图的可变性。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jun 28;55(7):693-697. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa112.

引用本文的文献

1
Switching to online: Testing the validity of supervised remote testing for online reinforcement learning experiments.切换到线上:测试在线强化学习实验中监督远程测试的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3645-3657. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01982-6. Epub 2022 Oct 11.