Asfour Victoria, Murphy Michael O, Attia Rizwan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Surrey, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;17(1):144-50. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt110.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: is vaginal delivery or caesarean section (CS) the safer mode of delivery in patients with adult congenital heart disease? Of the 119 studies, 13 papers represented the best evidence on the topic. Recommendations are based on 29 262 patients. Those having undergone successful corrective or palliative cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease, in addition to patients with unoperated congenital heart disease are a high-risk obstetric population. Heart disease is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the USA and the UK. Traditionally, CS was regarded as the mode of delivery of choice for high-risk patients, but growing experience in this field has now made this advice appear controversial. Patients are stratified into high- and low-risk, depending on the degree of heart failure symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class]. All studies demonstrated adverse outcomes in ACHD patients compared with normal age-matched controls. This pertained to a higher overall risk of maternal cardiac death, neonatal death, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and longer hospital stay. On univariate regression analysis, the variables that imparted the highest risk to mother and foetus, were right ventricular failure, pulmonary regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension (P < 0.001). Induction of labour was deemed safe and was not associated with higher CS rates. There was no increase in maternal or neonatal complications in patients who were NYHA class I and II at labour. Patients who were NYHA class III and IV at labour had higher complication rates with adverse feto-maternal outcomes (P < 0.0001) and longer intensive care unit and hospital stay (Spearman's correlation 0.326, P = 0.007). The largest cohort from the USA (26 973 ACHD births) demonstrated that ventricular septal defect was associated with the highest risk of maternal death and complications (P < 0.05). The data would indicate that patients NYHA class I and II symptoms are suitable for VD. For most NYHA III and IV patients a trail of labour is safe with expedited delivery under good analgesic control as dictated by obstetric needs. Due to high complication risks, CS may be indicated in a proportion of patients.
根据结构化方案撰写了一篇心脏外科的最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题是:对于患有成人先天性心脏病的患者,阴道分娩或剖宫产(CS)哪种分娩方式更安全?在119项研究中,13篇论文代表了该主题的最佳证据。建议基于29262名患者。那些因先天性心脏病接受过成功的矫正或姑息性心脏手术的患者,以及未接受手术的先天性心脏病患者,均属于高危产科人群。心脏病是美国和英国孕产妇死亡的主要原因。传统上,剖宫产被视为高危患者的首选分娩方式,但该领域不断积累的经验如今使这一建议显得颇具争议。根据心力衰竭症状的程度[纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级],将患者分为高危和低危。与年龄匹配的正常对照组相比,所有研究均表明患有成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)的患者存在不良结局。这涉及孕产妇心脏死亡、新生儿死亡、早产、胎儿生长受限以及住院时间延长的总体风险更高。单因素回归分析显示,对母亲和胎儿风险最高的变量是右心室衰竭、肺动脉反流和肺动脉高压(P<0.001)。引产被认为是安全的,且与剖宫产率升高无关。分娩时NYHA I级和II级的患者,其孕产妇或新生儿并发症并未增加。分娩时NYHA III级和IV级的患者并发症发生率更高,母婴结局不良(P<0.0001),重症监护病房和住院时间更长(Spearman相关性为0.326,P = 0.007)。来自美国的最大队列(26973例ACHD分娩)表明,室间隔缺损与孕产妇死亡和并发症的最高风险相关(P<0.05)。数据表明,NYHA I级和II级症状的患者适合阴道分娩。对于大多数NYHA III级和IV级患者,在良好的镇痛控制下,根据产科需求加快分娩,引产是安全的。由于并发症风险高,部分患者可能需要剖宫产。