Suppr超能文献

全内缝合技术与传统拔出缝合及缝合锚钉修复技术用于指深屈肌附着于骨的比较。

Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone.

作者信息

Chu Jennifer Y, Chen Tony, Awad Hani A, Elfar John, Hammert Warren C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jun;38(6):1084-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

One goal in repairing zone 1 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) injuries is to create a tendon-bone construct strong enough to allow early rehabilitation while minimizing morbidity. This study compares an all-inside suture repair technique biomechanically with pull-out suture and double-suture anchor repairs.

METHODS

Repairs were performed on 30 cadaver fingers. In all-inside suture repairs (n = 8), the FDP tendon was attached to bone with two 3-0 Ethibond sutures and tied over the dorsal aspect of distal phalanx. Pull-out suture repairs (n = 8) were performed with 2-0 Prolene suture and tied over a dorsal button. There were 2 suture anchor repair groups: Arthrex Micro Corkscrew anchors preloaded with 2-0 FiberWire suture (n = 7) and Depuy Micro Mitek anchors preloaded with 3-0 Orthocord suture (n = 7). Repair constructs were tested using a servohydraulic materials testing system and loaded until the repair lost 75% of its strength.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in tensile stiffness, ultimate load, or work to failure between the repairs. Failure mode was suture stretch and gap formation greater than 2 mm at the repair site for all pull-out suture repairs and for 7 of 8 all-inside suture repairs. Two of the Arthrex Micro Corkscrew repairs and 5 of the Depuy Micro Mitek repairs failed by anchor pull-out.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaveric biomechanical study showed no difference in tensile stiffness, ultimate load, and work to failures between an all-inside suture repair technique for zone 1 FDP repairs and previously described pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques. The all-inside suture technique also has the advantages of avoiding an external button and the cost of anchors. Therefore, it should be considered as an alternative to other techniques.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study introduces a new FDP reattachment technique that avoids some of the shortcomings of current techniques.

摘要

目的

修复指深屈肌(FDP)1区损伤的一个目标是构建足够坚固的肌腱-骨结构,以允许早期康复,同时将发病率降至最低。本研究对全内置缝合修复技术与抽出缝合及双缝合锚钉修复进行了生物力学比较。

方法

对30根尸体手指进行修复。在全内置缝合修复组(n = 8)中,使用两根3-0 Ethibond缝线将FDP肌腱附着于骨,并在远节指骨背侧打结。抽出缝合修复组(n = 8)使用2-0 Prolene缝线,并在背侧纽扣上打结。有两个缝合锚钉修复组:预加载2-0 FiberWire缝线的Arthrex微型螺旋锚钉组(n = 7)和预加载3-0 Orthocord缝线的Depuy微型Mitek锚钉组(n = 7)。使用伺服液压材料测试系统对修复结构进行测试,并加载直至修复结构丧失其强度的75%。

结果

各修复组之间在拉伸刚度、极限载荷或失效功方面无统计学显著差异。所有抽出缝合修复以及8例全内置缝合修复中的7例的失效模式为缝合线拉伸以及修复部位间隙形成大于2mm。2例Arthrex微型螺旋锚钉修复和5例Depuy微型Mitek锚钉修复因锚钉拔出而失败。

结论

这项尸体生物力学研究表明,用于FDP 1区修复的全内置缝合修复技术与先前描述的抽出缝合及缝合锚钉修复技术在拉伸刚度、极限载荷和失效功方面没有差异。全内置缝合技术还具有避免外部纽扣和锚钉成本的优点。因此,应将其视为其他技术的替代方法。

临床意义

本研究介绍了一种新的FDP重新附着技术,该技术避免了当前技术的一些缺点。

相似文献

3
Biomechanical characteristics of suture anchor implants for flexor digitorum profundus repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.023.
4
Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures.
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 May-Jun;32(5):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.003.
6
All-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques.
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Dec;48(12):1276.e1-1276.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
The Accommodation of Bone Anchors Within the Distal Phalanx for Repair of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsions.
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Nov;44(11):986.e1-986.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Closed avulsion of flexor digitorum profundus of the ring finger: Does the surgical technique really change the outcome?
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 8;65:102956. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102956. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Modified Pull-Out Technique for Zone One Flexor Digitorum Profundus Repair.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Nov;10(11):976-981. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.65724.3146.
4
The Transosseous Internal Four Strand Technique: A New All-Inside Technique for Zone 1 Flexor Tendon Repairs.
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jun;18(4):628-634. doi: 10.1177/15589447211060430. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
5
Four Anchor Repair of Jersey Finger.
Iowa Orthop J. 2021 Dec;41(2):95-100.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion Repair.
J Wrist Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):312-316. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685470. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
A review of mallet finger and jersey finger injuries in the athlete.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Mar;10(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9395-6.
8
Sports-related wrist and hand injuries: a review.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Sep 16;11(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0432-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Oct;36(10):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
2
Avulsion injuries of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Mar;19(3):152-62. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201103000-00004.
5
Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Feb;31(2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.020.
6
Effect of suture material on gap formation and failure in type 1 FDP avulsion repairs in a cadaver model.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Jun;21(5):481-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
7
A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):836-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.03.011.
10
The Mantero flexor tendon repair in zone 1.
J Hand Surg Br. 1999 Apr;24(2):148-51. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.1998.0173.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验