Suppr超能文献

指深屈肌至远节指骨的修复:四种技术的生物力学评估

Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.

作者信息

Lee Steve K, Fajardo Marc, Kardashian George, Klein Jason, Tsai Peter, Christoforou Dimitrios

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery Service, 535 East 70th St., New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Oct;36(10):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Many techniques for repair of the flexor digitorum profundus to the distal phalanx show excessive gapping with variable clinical results. The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical characteristics of an anchor-button (AB) technique, as compared to 3 other techniques.

METHODS

Twenty-four fresh-frozen human cadaveric fingers were randomized to 4 groups, 6 in each: group 1, 2-strand Bunnell suture button pullout technique; group 2, modified Kessler suture and 2 retrograde anchors; group 3: locking Krakow suture with 2 retrograde anchors; group 4, AB technique incorporating a 2-part repair, consisting of a locking dorsal Krakow suture with 2 retrograde anchors and a locking palmar Krakow suture fixed with a button. Tendon-to-bone gapping was measured after cyclical loading. Ultimate load to failure was measured at the end of 500 cycles.

RESULTS

The AB technique resulted in significantly less gapping when compared to the other techniques. It also resulted in a significantly stronger repair compared to all the other groups with an average load to failure comparable to the native tendon-to-bone interface.

CONCLUSIONS

The AB repair might allow for early active postoperative motion after repair of flexor digitorum profundus avulsion injuries and tendon reconstruction procedures; however, the soft tissue effects of this multistrand technique are unknown in clinical repairs.

摘要

目的

许多将指深屈肌腱修复至远节指骨的技术显示出过度的间隙,临床效果各异。本研究的目的是测试一种锚钉-纽扣(AB)技术与其他3种技术相比的生物力学特性。

方法

将24根新鲜冷冻的人体尸体手指随机分为4组,每组6根:第1组,双股邦内尔缝合法纽扣拔出技术;第2组,改良凯斯勒缝合法和2枚逆行锚钉;第3组,带2枚逆行锚钉的锁定克拉科夫缝合法;第4组,AB技术,采用两部分修复,包括带2枚逆行锚钉的锁定背侧克拉科夫缝合法和用纽扣固定的锁定掌侧克拉科夫缝合法。在循环加载后测量肌腱与骨的间隙。在500次循环结束时测量最终破坏载荷。

结果

与其他技术相比,AB技术导致的间隙明显更小。与所有其他组相比,它还导致修复明显更强,平均破坏载荷与天然肌腱-骨界面相当。

结论

AB修复可能允许在指深屈肌腱撕脱伤修复和肌腱重建手术后早期进行主动活动;然而,这种多股技术在临床修复中的软组织影响尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验