• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指深屈肌至远节指骨的修复:四种技术的生物力学评估

Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.

作者信息

Lee Steve K, Fajardo Marc, Kardashian George, Klein Jason, Tsai Peter, Christoforou Dimitrios

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery Service, 535 East 70th St., New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Oct;36(10):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.017
PMID:21873002
Abstract

PURPOSE

Many techniques for repair of the flexor digitorum profundus to the distal phalanx show excessive gapping with variable clinical results. The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical characteristics of an anchor-button (AB) technique, as compared to 3 other techniques.

METHODS

Twenty-four fresh-frozen human cadaveric fingers were randomized to 4 groups, 6 in each: group 1, 2-strand Bunnell suture button pullout technique; group 2, modified Kessler suture and 2 retrograde anchors; group 3: locking Krakow suture with 2 retrograde anchors; group 4, AB technique incorporating a 2-part repair, consisting of a locking dorsal Krakow suture with 2 retrograde anchors and a locking palmar Krakow suture fixed with a button. Tendon-to-bone gapping was measured after cyclical loading. Ultimate load to failure was measured at the end of 500 cycles.

RESULTS

The AB technique resulted in significantly less gapping when compared to the other techniques. It also resulted in a significantly stronger repair compared to all the other groups with an average load to failure comparable to the native tendon-to-bone interface.

CONCLUSIONS

The AB repair might allow for early active postoperative motion after repair of flexor digitorum profundus avulsion injuries and tendon reconstruction procedures; however, the soft tissue effects of this multistrand technique are unknown in clinical repairs.

摘要

目的

许多将指深屈肌腱修复至远节指骨的技术显示出过度的间隙,临床效果各异。本研究的目的是测试一种锚钉-纽扣(AB)技术与其他3种技术相比的生物力学特性。

方法

将24根新鲜冷冻的人体尸体手指随机分为4组,每组6根:第1组,双股邦内尔缝合法纽扣拔出技术;第2组,改良凯斯勒缝合法和2枚逆行锚钉;第3组,带2枚逆行锚钉的锁定克拉科夫缝合法;第4组,AB技术,采用两部分修复,包括带2枚逆行锚钉的锁定背侧克拉科夫缝合法和用纽扣固定的锁定掌侧克拉科夫缝合法。在循环加载后测量肌腱与骨的间隙。在500次循环结束时测量最终破坏载荷。

结果

与其他技术相比,AB技术导致的间隙明显更小。与所有其他组相比,它还导致修复明显更强,平均破坏载荷与天然肌腱-骨界面相当。

结论

AB修复可能允许在指深屈肌腱撕脱伤修复和肌腱重建手术后早期进行主动活动;然而,这种多股技术在临床修复中的软组织影响尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.指深屈肌至远节指骨的修复:四种技术的生物力学评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Oct;36(10):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
2
Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.I区屈指肌腱修复中纽扣拔出法与缝线锚钉法的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Feb;31(2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.020.
3
Bone suture anchors versus the pullout button for repair of distal profundus tendon injuries: a comparison of strength in human cadaveric hands.用于修复指深屈肌腱远端损伤的骨缝合锚钉与拔出钮:人体尸体手部强度比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2001 May;26(3):489-96. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.24135.
4
Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.屈指深肌腱远端固定中拔出缝线和微型Mitek缝线锚钉的循环测试
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 May;30(3):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.10.014.
5
Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.使用不同缝线尺寸修复Ⅱ区指深屈肌腱裂伤:一项比较性生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 May;30(3):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.02.008.
6
Zone I flexor digitorum profundus repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of tendon to bone repair in cadavera.Ⅰ区指深屈肌腱修复:尸体肌腱至骨修复的体外生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.11.007.
7
Biomechanical characteristics of suture anchor implants for flexor digitorum profundus repair.用于修复指深屈肌的缝线锚钉植入物的生物力学特性
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.023.
8
Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair.十字形四股屈肌腱修复的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Mar;24(2):295-301. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0295.
9
Reattachment of flexor digitorum profundus avulsion: biomechanical performance of 3 techniques.指深屈肌撕脱伤的再附着:三种技术的生物力学性能
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Nov;39(11):2214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
10
All-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques.全缝线锚钉修复屈指深肌腱止点:两种缝合技术的生物力学比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Dec;48(12):1276.e1-1276.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Studies for Suture Button Pullout Versus Suture Anchor Repair of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsions.指深屈肌撕脱伤缝合纽扣拔出与缝合锚钉修复的生物力学研究的Meta分析
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jun;19(4):671-678. doi: 10.1177/15589447221126760. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
The Transosseous Internal Four Strand Technique: A New All-Inside Technique for Zone 1 Flexor Tendon Repairs.经皮骨道内四股技术:修复 I 区屈肌腱的全新全内技术。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jun;18(4):628-634. doi: 10.1177/15589447211060430. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
3
Four Anchor Repair of Jersey Finger.
四锚修复法治疗 Jersey 指。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021 Dec;41(2):95-100.
4
Anatomy and histomorphology of the flexor digitorum profundus enthesis: functional implications for tissue engineering and surgery.屈指深肌腱止点的解剖和组织形态学:对组织工程和手术的功能意义。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 10;22(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04922-1.
5
A jersey finger diagnostic trap: Rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon.一种“篮球指”诊断陷阱:指深屈肌腱和指浅屈肌腱断裂。
Trauma Case Rep. 2021 Apr 21;34:100476. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100476. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Hook Plate as a Treatment for Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion Types II and III.钩钢板治疗屈指深肌腱 II 型和 III 型撕脱。
Hand (N Y). 2021 Jul;16(4):551-556. doi: 10.1177/1558944720957730. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion Repair.指深屈肌撕脱伤修复的生物力学比较
J Wrist Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):312-316. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685470. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
The effect of suture caliber and number of core suture strands on zone II flexor tendon repair: a study in human cadavers.缝线直径及核心缝线股数对Ⅱ区屈指肌腱修复的影响:一项人体尸体研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
9
Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone.全内缝合技术与传统拔出缝合及缝合锚钉修复技术用于指深屈肌附着于骨的比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jun;38(6):1084-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Apr 9.