Suppr超能文献

经皮骨道内四股技术:修复 I 区屈肌腱的全新全内技术。

The Transosseous Internal Four Strand Technique: A New All-Inside Technique for Zone 1 Flexor Tendon Repairs.

机构信息

BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Germany.

Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2023 Jun;18(4):628-634. doi: 10.1177/15589447211060430. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple techniques for the repair of flexor tendon injuries in zone 1 have been proposed over time. While pull-out suture techniques and bone anchor seem to be stronger than internal suture techniques, they are associated with a higher complication rate. We therefore developed an alternative internal suture repair with similar biomechanical stability to those of pull-out sutures and bone anchors.

METHODS

Twenty porcine distal phalanges and deep flexor tendons were randomized to 2 groups of 10 each. The tendons were transsected at the level of the distal interphalangeal joint. In group 1, repairs were performed with a well-established intraosseous suture repair and in group 2 with our new multistrand technique. The repairs were biomechanically tested with linear distraction until failure.

RESULTS

We recorded a significantly higher 2-mm gap force (2GF)-and thus higher stability-of the repairs in group 1 in comparison to group 2. With a 2GF of more than 50 N, our suture technique allows for a modern early active motion rehabilitation protocol. Breakage of the suture construct occurred at random places in the repair in both groups. No pull-outs were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a strong transosseous multistrand repair technique for flexor tendon repair in zone 1 that is simple and fast to perform and should have enough strength to withstand early active motion rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

随着时间的推移,已经提出了多种修复 1 区屈肌腱损伤的技术。虽然抽出缝线技术和骨锚似乎比内部缝线技术更强,但它们与更高的并发症发生率相关。因此,我们开发了一种替代的内部缝线修复方法,其生物力学稳定性与抽出缝线和骨锚相似。

方法

20 个猪的远节指骨和深部屈肌腱随机分为两组,每组 10 个。肌腱在远节指间关节水平处横断。在第 1 组中,采用已建立的骨内缝线修复,在第 2 组中采用我们的新多股技术进行修复。通过线性分离测试修复体的生物力学性能,直至失效。

结果

我们记录到第 1 组的 2mm 间隙力(2GF)-因此稳定性更高-明显高于第 2 组。我们的缝线技术在 2GF 超过 50N 时允许进行现代的早期主动运动康复方案。在两组中,缝线结构的断裂都发生在修复的任意部位。没有出现抽出。

结论

本研究提出了一种用于 1 区屈肌腱修复的简单、快速的强骨内多股修复技术,应该具有足够的强度来承受早期主动运动康复。

相似文献

1
The Transosseous Internal Four Strand Technique: A New All-Inside Technique for Zone 1 Flexor Tendon Repairs.
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jun;18(4):628-634. doi: 10.1177/15589447211060430. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
3
The Impact of Suture Caliber and Looped Configurations on the Suture-Tendon Interface in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):156.e1-156.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Feb;31(2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.020.
5
Transosseous Sutures in Tendon-to-Bone Repairs: the Role of the Epitendinous Suture.
J Invest Surg. 2022 Mar;35(3):584-590. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1904464. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
A Biomechanical Study of a Novel Asymmetric 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair Using Porcine Tendons.
Hand (N Y). 2018 Jan;13(1):50-55. doi: 10.1177/1558944716685829. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):836-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.03.011.
9
Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Mar;24(2):295-301. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0295.
10
Comparison of Flexor Tendon Repair Between 6-Strand Lim-Tsai With 4-Strand Cruciate and Becker Technique.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Sep;40(9):1806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Transosseous Sutures in Tendon-to-Bone Repairs: the Role of the Epitendinous Suture.
J Invest Surg. 2022 Mar;35(3):584-590. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1904464. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion Repair.
J Wrist Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):312-316. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685470. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
The Effect of Distal Phalanx Bony Dimensions in Suture Anchor Fixations of Tendon Avulsion.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2018 Sep;23(3):347-350. doi: 10.1142/S2424835518500340.
4
Four-Strand Core Suture Improves Flexor Tendon Repair Compared to Two-Strand Technique in a Rabbit Model.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4063137. doi: 10.1155/2016/4063137. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
Comparison of Flexor Tendon Suture Techniques Including 1 Using 10 Strands.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Reattachment of flexor digitorum profundus avulsion: biomechanical performance of 3 techniques.
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Nov;39(11):2214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
7
[Management of zone 1 flexor digitorum profundus tendon injuries].
Chir Main. 2014 Dec;33 Suppl:S13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
8
Biomechanical characteristics of suture anchor implants for flexor digitorum profundus repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验