• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查工具(CARTS):用于调查依恋安全性和儿童创伤史的关系-社会生态框架。

Development of a Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS): a relational-socioecological framework for surveying attachment security and childhood trauma history.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada ; Department of Psychiatry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada ; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 Apr 9;4. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20232. Print 2013.

DOI:10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20232
PMID:23580403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3622711/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current psychometric measures of childhood trauma history generally fail to assess the relational-socioecological context within which childhood maltreatment occurs, including the relationship of abusers to abused persons, the emotional availability of caregivers, and the respondent's own thoughts, feelings, and actions in response to maltreatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a computerized approach to measuring the relational-socioecological context within which childhood maltreatment occurs.

METHOD

The psychometric properties of a Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS) were evaluated as a retrospective survey of childhood maltreatment history designed to be appropriate for completion by adults. Participants were undergraduates (n=222), an internet sample (n=123), and psychiatric outpatients (n=30).

RESULTS

The internal reliability, convergent, and concurrent validity of the CARTS were supported across samples. Paired differences in means and correlations between rated item-descriptiveness to self, mothers, and fathers also accorded with findings of prior attachment and maltreatment research, illustrating the utility of assessing the occurrence and effects of maltreatment within a relational-socioecological framework.

CONCLUSIONS

Results preliminarily support a new survey methodology for assessing childhood maltreatment within a relational-socioecological framework. Further psychometric evaluation of the CARTS is warranted.

摘要

背景

目前,用于评估儿童创伤史的心理计量学方法通常无法评估虐待儿童发生的关系-社会生态环境,包括施虐者与受虐者之间的关系、照顾者的情感可用性以及受虐者对虐待的自身想法、感受和行为。

目的

评估一种用于评估儿童虐待发生的关系-社会生态环境的计算机化方法。

方法

评估了儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查(CARTS)的心理计量学特性,该筛查是作为一种回顾性的儿童虐待史调查设计的,旨在适合成年人完成。参与者包括本科生(n=222)、互联网样本(n=123)和精神科门诊患者(n=30)。

结果

在不同样本中,CARTS 的内部可靠性、聚合效度和同时效度均得到支持。对自我、母亲和父亲的评定项目描述性与评定分数之间的配对差异以及相关性也符合先前的依恋和虐待研究结果,说明了在关系-社会生态框架内评估虐待的发生和影响的实用性。

结论

结果初步支持了一种用于评估关系-社会生态框架内儿童虐待的新调查方法。需要进一步对 CARTS 进行心理计量学评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/3622711/fb80de5b5bea/EJPT-4-20232-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/3622711/3614fec87dd6/EJPT-4-20232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/3622711/fb80de5b5bea/EJPT-4-20232-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/3622711/3614fec87dd6/EJPT-4-20232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/3622711/fb80de5b5bea/EJPT-4-20232-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS): a relational-socioecological framework for surveying attachment security and childhood trauma history.发展儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查工具(CARTS):用于调查依恋安全性和儿童创伤史的关系-社会生态框架。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 Apr 9;4. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20232. Print 2013.
2
Assessing the family dynamics of childhood maltreatment history with the Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS).使用儿童依恋与关系创伤筛查量表(CARTS)评估有童年虐待史者的家庭动态。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Aug 3;6:27792. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27792. eCollection 2015.
3
Validation and cross-cultural comparisons of the German Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS).验证和跨文化比较的德国儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查(CARTS)。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 May 27;12(1):1918901. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1918901.
4
Italian translation and cross-cultural comparison with the Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS).与儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查量表(CARTS)的意大利语翻译及跨文化比较。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 10;8(1):1375839. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1375839. eCollection 2017.
5
Childhood trauma histories in men and women assessed by the childhood attachment and relational trauma screen (CARTS) and the global psychotrauma screen (GPS): Results from the global collaboration on traumatic stress (GC-TS).通过儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查(CARTS)和全球心理创伤筛查(GPS)评估的男性和女性的儿童期创伤史:创伤应激全球合作组织(GC-TS)的研究结果。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Mar;149:106610. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106610. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
6
Parenting after a history of childhood maltreatment: A scoping review and map of evidence in the perinatal period.有儿童期虐待史的父母养育子女:围产期证据的范围综述和图谱。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0213460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213460. eCollection 2019.
7
Predicting a dissociative disorder from type of childhood maltreatment and abuser-abused relational tie.根据童年期虐待类型及施虐者与受虐者的关系来预测分离性障碍。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2017 May-Jun;18(3):356-372. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2017.1295420. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
The Complex Trauma Questionnaire (ComplexTQ): development and preliminary psychometric properties of an instrument for measuring early relational trauma.复杂创伤问卷(ComplexTQ):一种测量早期关系性创伤工具的开发及初步心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;6:1323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01323. eCollection 2015.
9
Childhood maltreatment and migraine (part I). Prevalence and adult revictimization: a multicenter headache clinic survey.儿童期虐待与偏头痛(上):患病率与成年期再受虐:一项多中心头痛诊所调查。
Headache. 2010 Jan;50(1):20-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01556.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
10
Measuring types and timing of childhood maltreatment: The psychometric properties of the KERF-40.测量儿童期虐待的类型和时间:KERF-40 的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 8;17(9):e0273931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273931. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS): psychometric properties in two Internet-based studies.全球心理创伤筛查(GPS):两项基于互联网的研究中的心理测量学特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jun 25;12(1):1881725. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1881725. eCollection 2021.
2
Validation and cross-cultural comparisons of the German Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS).验证和跨文化比较的德国儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查(CARTS)。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 May 27;12(1):1918901. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1918901.
3
Parenting and Child Development: A Relational Health Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary evaluation of the childhood experiences of violence questionnaire short form.暴力童年经历问卷短式初评。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jan;27(2):396-407. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416462. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
2
Development and initial psychometric properties of the Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventory (CAMI): a comprehensive self-report measure of child maltreatment history.《计算机辅助虐待问卷(CAMI)的编制及初步心理测量学特性:一种全面的儿童虐待史自评量表》
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 May;34(5):305-17. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.015. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
3
Measurement of victimization in adolescence: development and validation of the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire.
育儿与儿童发展:关系健康视角
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 May 26;15(1):45-59. doi: 10.1177/1559827619849028. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
4
Screening for consequences of trauma - an update on the global collaboration on traumatic stress.创伤后果筛查——创伤应激全球合作的最新情况
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Apr 27;11(1):1752504. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1752504. eCollection 2020.
5
Child maltreatment across the lifespan.一生中的儿童虐待问题。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Aug 2;8(Suppl 7):1483165. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1483165. eCollection 2017.
6
The global collaboration on traumatic stress.创伤应激领域的全球合作。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Nov 30;8(sup7):1403257. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1403257. eCollection 2017.
7
Italian translation and cross-cultural comparison with the Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS).与儿童依恋和关系创伤筛查量表(CARTS)的意大利语翻译及跨文化比较。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 10;8(1):1375839. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1375839. eCollection 2017.
8
Choosing the right instruments for psychotrauma related research.为与心理创伤相关的研究选择合适的工具。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Dec 28;6:30585. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.30585. eCollection 2015.
9
Assessing the family dynamics of childhood maltreatment history with the Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS).使用儿童依恋与关系创伤筛查量表(CARTS)评估有童年虐待史者的家庭动态。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Aug 3;6:27792. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27792. eCollection 2015.
10
Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda.移动心理健康:一项具有挑战性的研究议程。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 19;6:27882. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27882. eCollection 2015.
青少年受害情况的测量:暴力童年经历问卷的编制与验证
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Nov;32(11):1037-57. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
4
Child maltreatment.儿童虐待。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:409-38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144029.
5
A brief two-item screener for detecting a history of physical or sexual abuse in childhood.一种用于检测童年期身体或性虐待史的简短两项筛查工具。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;29(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.10.013.
6
Ecological influences on the sequelae of child maltreatment: a review of the literature.生态因素对儿童虐待后遗症的影响:文献综述
Child Maltreat. 2006 Feb;11(1):49-62. doi: 10.1177/1077559505283591.
7
Measuring poly-victimization using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire.使用青少年受害情况问卷来测量多重受害情况。
Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Nov;29(11):1297-312. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.06.005.
8
Still looking for Poppa.仍在寻找爸爸。
Am Psychol. 2005 Oct;60(7):735-6. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.735.
9
The Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: reliability, validity, and national norms.青少年受害情况调查问卷:信度、效度及全国常模。
Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Apr;29(4):383-412. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.11.001.
10
Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population.心理评估中的焦点小组:通过咨询目标人群成员提高内容效度
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):231-43. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.231.