Suppr超能文献

抗体检测在脑免疫组化中的应用:大麻素 CB₂ 受体的脑免疫标记。

Antibody testing for brain immunohistochemistry: brain immunolabeling for the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago Medical School, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Jun 15;216(2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

Abstract

The question of whether cannabinoid CB₂ receptors are expressed on neurons in the brain and under what circumstances they are expressed is controversial in cannabinoid neuropharmacology. While some studies have reported that CB₂ receptors are not detectable on neurons under normal circumstances, other studies have reported abundant neuronal expression. One reason for these apparent discrepancies is the reliance on incompletely validated CB₂ receptor antibodies and immunohistochemical procedures. In this study, we demonstrate some of the methodological problems encountered using three different commercial CB₂ receptor antibodies. We show that (1) the commonly used antibodies that were confirmed by many of the tests used for antibody validation still failed when examined using the knockout control test; (2) the coherence between the labeling patterns provided by two antibodies for the same protein at different epitopes may be misleading and must be validated using both low- and high-magnification microscopy; and (3) although CB₂ receptor antibodies may label neurons in the brain, the protein that the antibodies are labeling is not necessarily CB₂. These results showed that great caution needs to be exercised when interpreting the results of brain immunohistochemistry using CB₂ receptor antibodies and that, in general, none of the tests for antibody validity that have been proposed, apart from the knockout control test, are reliable.

摘要

在大麻素神经药理学中,关于大脑神经元是否表达大麻素 CB₂ 受体以及在什么情况下表达,这一问题存在争议。虽然一些研究报告称,在正常情况下神经元上无法检测到 CB₂ 受体,但其他研究报告称神经元上有丰富的表达。造成这些明显差异的原因之一是依赖不完全有效的 CB₂ 受体抗体和免疫组织化学程序。在这项研究中,我们使用三种不同的商业 CB₂ 受体抗体来证明一些遇到的方法学问题。我们表明:(1) 经过许多抗体验证测试证实的常用抗体,在使用敲除对照测试时仍然无法通过;(2) 同一蛋白不同表位的两种抗体提供的标记模式之间的一致性可能具有误导性,必须使用低倍和高倍显微镜进行验证;(3) 尽管 CB₂ 受体抗体可能标记大脑中的神经元,但抗体所标记的蛋白质不一定是 CB₂。这些结果表明,在使用 CB₂ 受体抗体进行脑免疫组织化学分析时,需要非常谨慎,除了敲除对照测试外,目前提出的抗体有效性测试都不可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验