Ecsin - European Center for the Sustainable Impact of Nanotechnologies, Veneto Nanotech SCpA , Rovigo , Italy.
Nanotoxicology. 2014 Jun;8(4):455-64. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2013.796538. Epub 2013 May 15.
We previously described the behaviour of different cobalt forms, i.e., cobalt nanoparticles (CoNP), cobalt microparticles (CoMP) and cobalt ions (Co(2+)), in culture medium (dissolution, interaction with medium components, bioavailability) as well as their uptake and intracellular distribution in Balb/3T3 mouse fibroblasts (Sabbioni, Nanotoxicology, 2012). Here, we assess the cytotoxicity and morphological transformation of CoNP compared not only to Co(2+), but also to CoMP and to released Co products. Cytotoxicity reached maximum at 4-h exposure, with ranking CoMP > CoNP > Co(2+). However, if we consider toxicity as a function of intracellular Co, toxicity of the ionic forms seems to prevail over the particles. Co forms other than Co(2+) released from particles had toxicity intermediate between particles and ions. Alterations in concentrations of essential elements (Cu, Mg, Zn) in cells exposed to Co particles may contribute to toxicity. Both CoMP and CoNP (but not Co(2+) and other released Co forms) induced morphological transformation (CoMP > CoNP). This was dependent on reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation, as indicated by inhibition of type III foci with ascorbic acid. The present results suggest that the previously demonstrated massive mitochondrial and nuclear Co internalisation and DNA adduct formation by CoMP and CoNP (Sabbioni, Nanotoxicology, 2012) induce toxicity and transformation. On the contrary, the role of ions released by particles in culture medium is negligible. Thus, both the chemical and the physical properties of Co particles contribute to cytotoxicity and morphological transformation.
我们之前描述了不同钴形态的行为,即钴纳米粒子(CoNP)、钴微粒(CoMP)和钴离子(Co(2+))在培养基中的行为(溶解、与培养基成分相互作用、生物利用度)以及它们在 Balb/3T3 小鼠成纤维细胞中的摄取和细胞内分布(Sabbioni,Nanotoxicology,2012)。在这里,我们评估了 CoNP 的细胞毒性和形态转化,不仅与 Co(2+)相比,还与 CoMP 和释放的 Co 产物相比。细胞毒性在 4 小时暴露时达到最大值,CoMP > CoNP > Co(2+)。然而,如果我们将毒性视为细胞内 Co 的函数,那么离子形式的毒性似乎超过了颗粒。从颗粒中释放的 Co 形态除了 Co(2+)之外,其毒性介于颗粒和离子之间。暴露于 Co 颗粒的细胞中必需元素(Cu、Mg、Zn)浓度的变化可能导致毒性。CoMP 和 CoNP(但不是 Co(2+)和其他释放的 Co 形态)都诱导了形态转化(CoMP > CoNP)。这是由于活性氧物种的产生和脂质过氧化,如用抗坏血酸抑制 III 型焦点所表明的那样。目前的结果表明,先前证明的 CoMP 和 CoNP 大量的线粒体和核内 Co 内化和 DNA 加合物形成(Sabbioni,Nanotoxicology,2012)引起了毒性和转化。相反,颗粒在培养基中释放的离子的作用可以忽略不计。因此,Co 颗粒的化学和物理性质都导致了细胞毒性和形态转化。