• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA 的最小临床重要差异:来自双重随机偏好试验(DRPT)的结果。

Minimal clinically important differences for the EQ-5D and QWB-SA in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): results from a Doubly Randomized Preference Trial (DRPT).

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Administration and Practice, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766-1854, USA.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Apr 12;11:59. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-59.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-11-59
PMID:23587015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3635945/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the health-utility measures EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale in PTSD patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Two hundred patients aged 18 to 65 years with PTSD enrolled in a doubly randomized preference trial (DRPT) examining the treatment and treatment-preference effects between cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy with sertraline and completed the EQ-5D and QWB-SA at baseline and 10-week post-treatment. The anchor-based methods utilized a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity. We regressed the changes in EQ-5D and QWB-SA scores on changes in the anchors using ordinary least squares regression. The slopes (beta coefficients) were the rates of change in the anchors as functions of change in EQ-5D and QWB, which represent our estimates of MCID. In addition, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to examine the relationship between the changes in EQ-5D and QWB-SA scores and treatment-response status. The MCIDs were estimated from the ROC curve where they best discriminate between treatment responders and non-responders. The distribution-based methods used small to moderate effect size in terms of 0.2 and 0.5 of standard deviation of the pre-treatment EQ-5D and QWB-SA scores.

RESULTS

The anchor-based methods estimated the MCID ranges of 0.05 to 0.08 for the EQ-5D and 0.03 to 0.05 for the QWB. The MCID ranges were higher with the distribution-based methods, ranging from 0.04 to 0.10 for the EQ-5D and 0.02 to 0.05 for the QWB-SA.

CONCLUSIONS

The established MCID ranges of EQ-5D and QWB-SA can be a useful tool in assessing meaningful changes in patient's quality of life for researchers and clinicians, and assisting health-policy makers to make informing decision in mental health treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00127673.

摘要

目的

确定创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者健康效用测量量表 EuroQol-5 维度(EQ-5D)和自我评估健康状况问卷(QWB-SA)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

研究设计和方法

200 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的 PTSD 患者参加了一项双随机偏好试验(DRPT),该试验检查了认知行为疗法与舍曲林药物治疗之间的治疗效果和治疗偏好,并在基线和 10 周治疗后完成了 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA。基于锚定的方法利用了临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)和临床总体印象严重程度。我们使用普通最小二乘法回归将 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA 评分的变化与锚定的变化进行回归。斜率(β系数)是锚定随 EQ-5D 和 QWB 变化的变化率,代表我们对 MCID 的估计。此外,我们进行了接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以检查 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA 评分变化与治疗反应状态之间的关系。MCID 是从 ROC 曲线中估计出来的,在该曲线中,它们可以最好地区分治疗反应者和非反应者。基于分布的方法使用了 0.2 和 0.5 个标准差的小到中等效应大小,用于治疗前 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA 评分。

结果

基于锚定的方法估计 EQ-5D 的 MCID 范围为 0.05 至 0.08,QWB 的 MCID 范围为 0.03 至 0.05。基于分布的方法的 MCID 范围更高,EQ-5D 的范围为 0.04 至 0.10,QWB-SA 的范围为 0.02 至 0.05。

结论

为研究人员和临床医生确定的 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA 的 MCID 范围可以作为评估患者生活质量有意义变化的有用工具,并帮助卫生政策制定者在精神卫生治疗方面做出知情决策。

临床试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov;标识符:NCT00127673。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/efa77d072055/1477-7525-11-59-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/fcff1861b0a3/1477-7525-11-59-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/3196dbad95f9/1477-7525-11-59-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/fe99d0477fae/1477-7525-11-59-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/efa77d072055/1477-7525-11-59-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/fcff1861b0a3/1477-7525-11-59-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/3196dbad95f9/1477-7525-11-59-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/fe99d0477fae/1477-7525-11-59-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a986/3635945/efa77d072055/1477-7525-11-59-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal clinically important differences for the EQ-5D and QWB-SA in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): results from a Doubly Randomized Preference Trial (DRPT).创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的 EQ-5D 和 QWB-SA 的最小临床重要差异:来自双重随机偏好试验(DRPT)的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Apr 12;11:59. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-59.
2
Validation of a Chinese version of the Quality of Well-Being Scale-Self-Administered (QWB-SA) in patients with epilepsy.验证中文版健康相关生活质量量表自我评估版(QWB-SA)在癫痫患者中的适用性。
Epilepsia. 2013 Sep;54(9):1647-57. doi: 10.1111/epi.12324. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
3
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症后评估疼痛、残疾和健康状况的最小临床重要差异的效用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
4
Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the EQ-5D-3L in older adults with a history of falls.确定有跌倒史的老年人中 EQ-5D-3L 的最小临床重要差异。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Nov;31(11):3293-3303. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03231-x. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Cost-effectiveness of prolonged exposure therapy versus pharmacotherapy and treatment choice in posttraumatic stress disorder (the Optimizing PTSD Treatment Trial): a doubly randomized preference trial.创伤后应激障碍中延长暴露疗法与药物疗法的成本效益及治疗选择(优化创伤后应激障碍治疗试验):一项双重随机偏好试验
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;75(3):222-30. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08719.
6
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the EQ-5D-5L in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a longitudinal study.宫颈上皮内瘤变患者的 EQ-5D-5L 反应性和最小临床重要差异:一项纵向研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 2;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01578-8.
7
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
8
Effects of treatment, choice, and preference on health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).治疗、选择和偏好对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者健康相关生活质量结局的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1555-1562. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1833-4. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的 EQ-5D 效用指数和最小临床重要差异的有效性评估。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1116-z.
10
Development and validation of a mental health subscale from the Quality of Well-Being Self-Administered.《幸福感自评量表》心理健康分量表的编制与验证。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1685-96. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0296-2. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study.孕早期详细异常超声筛查的临床效果及成本效益:一项混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(22):1-250. doi: 10.3310/NLTP7102.
2
A systematic review of minimum important changes for generic multi-attribute utility instruments and recommendations for their estimation.通用多属性效用工具最小重要变化的系统评价及其估计建议。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01778-3.
3
Generalized Pairwise Comparisons to Support Shared Decision-Making in the CODA Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Posttraumatic stress symptoms and health-related quality of life: a two year follow up study of injury treated at the emergency department.创伤后应激症状与健康相关的生活质量:急诊科治疗的损伤两年随访研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 9;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-1.
2
Predictors of health-related quality-of-life utilities among persons with posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍患者健康相关生活质量效用的预测因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Mar;62(3):272-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_0272.
3
A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation.
支持CODA试验中共同决策的广义成对比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252484. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2484.
4
Controlled Inhalation of Tetrahydrocannabinol-Predominant Cannabis Flos Mitigates Severity of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Improves Quality of Sleep and General Mood in Cannabis-Experienced UK Civilians: A Real-World, Observational Study.对以四氢大麻酚为主的大麻花朵进行控制性吸入可减轻有大麻使用经历的英国平民创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度,并改善睡眠质量和总体情绪:一项真实世界的观察性研究。
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Aug 28;7(1):149-159. doi: 10.1159/000540978. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Health-related quality of life in psychiatric outpatients: a cross-sectional study of associations with symptoms, diagnoses, and employment status.精神科门诊患者的健康相关生活质量:一项与症状、诊断和就业状况关联的横断面研究。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3093-3105. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03748-3. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
6
The Impact of Peri-operative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols on Outcomes Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.围手术期手术加速康复方案对成人颈椎畸形手术后结局的影响。
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1544-1551. doi: 10.1177/21925682241249105. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
7
Creating a Multiply Imputed Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L in Canada: State-Level Misspecification Terms Are Needed to Characterize Parameter Uncertainty Correctly.为加拿大的 EQ-5D-5L 创建一个多重填补值集:需要使用状态级别的指定错误术语来正确描述参数不确定性。
Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):405-414. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241241328. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
8
Health-related quality of life of Korean older adults according to age, sex, and living arrangements: a cross-sectional study.依据年龄、性别和居住安排划分的韩国老年人健康相关生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1281457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281457. eCollection 2023.
9
Reconsolidation of traumatic memories protocol compared to trauma-focussed cognitive behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in UK military veterans: a randomised controlled feasibility trial.与创伤聚焦认知行为疗法相比,创伤记忆再巩固方案治疗英国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的随机对照可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 13;9(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01396-x.
10
Blood Pressure Management After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The BEST-II Randomized Clinical Trial.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗后血压管理:BEST-II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):821-831. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.14330.
比较 5 种偏好加权健康状态分类系统在椎间盘突出症患者中的纵向比较。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):270-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10380924. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
4
Using instrument-defined health state transitions to estimate minimally important differences for four preference-based health-related quality of life instruments.使用仪器定义的健康状态转变来估计四种基于偏好的健康相关生活质量工具的最小重要差异。
Med Care. 2010 Apr;48(4):365-71. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181c162a2.
5
Minimal clinically important difference for the ocular surface disease index.眼表疾病指数的最小临床重要差异。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;128(1):94-101. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.356.
6
Posttraumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease: findings from the Heart and Soul Study.冠心病患者的创伤后应激障碍与健康相关生活质量:来自“心灵研究”的发现
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;66(11):1214-20. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.149.
7
Preference-weighted health status of PTSD among veterans: an outcome for cost-effectiveness analysis using clinical data.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)退伍军人的偏好加权健康状况:使用临床数据进行成本效益分析的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Sep;60(9):1230-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.9.1230.
8
Evaluation of the meaningfulness of health-related quality of life improvements as assessed by the SF-36 and the EQ-5D VAS in patients with active Crohn's disease.通过SF-36和EQ-5D视觉模拟量表评估活动期克罗恩病患者健康相关生活质量改善的意义。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 May 1;29(9):1032-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03966.x.
9
Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference.在接受者操作特征分析中使用整个队列可使最小重要差异的精度最大化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
10
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.