• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈上皮内瘤变患者的 EQ-5D-5L 反应性和最小临床重要差异:一项纵向研究。

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the EQ-5D-5L in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a longitudinal study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 2;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01578-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-020-01578-8
PMID:33008423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7531135/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the widespread clinical application of the five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), whether the questionnaire scores are responsive to changes in patients' health and how much changes in questionnaire scores represent patients' real health changes require consideration. Consequently, we assessed responsiveness and estimated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the EQ-5D-5L in surgically treated patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to determine the relationship between MCID and minimal detectable change (MDC).

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal, observational study. Participants were patients with CIN from the gynecology inpatient department of a grade-A tertiary hospital in Shihezi, Xinjiang, China. Participants completed the EQ-5D-5L and the Global Rating of Change Questionnaire (GRCQ) at baseline and one month post-surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare EQ-5D-5L scores pre- and post-treatment. We calculated the effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM) to quantitatively assess responsiveness. Distribution-based, anchor-based, and instrument-defined methods were used to estimate MCID. MCID to MDC ratios at individual- and group-levels were also calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with CIN completed the follow-up investigation (mean age 44.76 ± 8.72 years; mean follow-up time 32.28 ± 1.43 days). The index value and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) of the EQ-5D-5L improved by 0.025 and 6.92 (all p < 0.05) at follow-up as compared to baseline respectively. The ES and the SRM of the index value were 0.47 and 0.42 respectively, indicating small responsiveness; while the ES and the SRM of EQ VAS were 0.50 and 0.49 respectively, indicating small to moderate responsiveness. The average (range) of MCIDs for index value and EQ VAS were 0.039 (0.023-0.064) and 5.35 (3.12-6.99) respectively. These values can only be used to determine whether patients have experienced clinically meaningful health improvements at the group level.

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ-5D-5L has only small to moderate responsiveness in post-surgical patients with CIN, and the MCIDs developed in this study can be used for group-level health assessment. However, further study is needed concerning health changes at the individual level.

摘要

背景

随着欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)五级版本在临床上的广泛应用,问卷评分是否能对患者健康变化做出反应,以及问卷评分变化多少才能代表患者真实的健康变化,这些问题都需要考虑。因此,我们评估了手术治疗的宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)患者的 EQ-5D-5L 的反应性,并估计了最小临床重要差异(MCID),以确定 MCID 与最小可检测变化(MDC)之间的关系。

方法

我们进行了一项纵向观察性研究。参与者为来自中国新疆石河子市一家甲级三级医院妇科住院部的 CIN 患者。参与者在基线和手术后一个月时完成了 EQ-5D-5L 和全球变化量表(GRCQ)的评估。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较治疗前后的 EQ-5D-5L 评分。我们使用效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)来定量评估反应性。使用基于分布、基于锚定和基于工具的方法来估计 MCID。还计算了个体和群体水平的 MCID 与 MDC 的比值。

结果

50 名 CIN 患者完成了随访调查(平均年龄 44.76±8.72 岁;平均随访时间 32.28±1.43 天)。与基线相比,EQ-5D-5L 的指标值和 EQ 视觉模拟量表(EQ VAS)分别提高了 0.025 和 6.92(均 p<0.05)。指标值的 ES 和 SRM 分别为 0.47 和 0.42,表明反应较小;而 EQ VAS 的 ES 和 SRM 分别为 0.50 和 0.49,表明反应为小到中度。指标值和 EQ VAS 的平均(范围)MCID 分别为 0.039(0.023-0.064)和 5.35(3.12-6.99)。这些值只能用于确定患者在群体水平上是否经历了有临床意义的健康改善。

结论

在手术治疗的 CIN 患者中,EQ-5D-5L 仅具有小到中度的反应性,本研究中开发的 MCID 可用于群体健康评估。然而,仍需要进一步研究个体层面的健康变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/5cc460d87f80/12955_2020_1578_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/ffe86f784f75/12955_2020_1578_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/831bc0dc32c6/12955_2020_1578_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/5cc460d87f80/12955_2020_1578_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/ffe86f784f75/12955_2020_1578_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/831bc0dc32c6/12955_2020_1578_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/7531135/5cc460d87f80/12955_2020_1578_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the EQ-5D-5L in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a longitudinal study.宫颈上皮内瘤变患者的 EQ-5D-5L 反应性和最小临床重要差异:一项纵向研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 2;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01578-8.
2
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病患者EQ-5D-5L的反应性及最小临床重要差异:一项纵向研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 9;10:1074969. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1074969. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients.比较EQ-5D-5L、EQ-5D-3L和EQ视觉模拟量表在中风患者中的反应性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jun;24(6):1555-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0873-7. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
4
Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.EQ-5D-5L在接受康复治疗的中风患者中的效度、反应度及最小临床重要差异
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1585-96. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
5
Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.澳大利亚膝关节置换人群中使用最小重要差异、同时效度、预测效度和反应度评价 EQ-5D-5L、EQ-VAS 独立分量和牛津膝关节评分。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 May 10;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02126-w.
6
Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness.髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者的 EQ-5D-5L 量表的心理测量特性:信度、效度和反应度。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2897-2908. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1929-x. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
7
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
8
Validity and measurement equivalence of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire among heart failure patients in Malaysia: a cohort study.马来西亚心力衰竭患者 EQ-5D-5L 问卷的有效性和测量等效性:一项队列研究。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):607-617. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2337563. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
9
Internal Responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in Dutch Breast Cancer Patients during the First Year Post-Surgery: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.荷兰乳腺癌患者术后第一年EQ-5D-5L和EORTC QLQ-C30的内部反应性:一项纵向队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 21;16(11):1952. doi: 10.3390/cancers16111952.
10
A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.愿景“附加”提高 EQ-5D 的反应性:白内障手术研究的初步证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01156-w. Epub 2020 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
SAHRANG: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Recovery and Galantamine: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.萨朗:蛛网膜下腔出血康复与加兰他敏:一项多中心随机安慰剂对照试验的初步研究
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02349-3.
2
User Experiences of the Cue2walk Smart Cueing Device for Freezing of Gait in People with Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病患者使用Cue2walk智能提示装置应对步态冻结的用户体验
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;25(15):4702. doi: 10.3390/s25154702.
3
Comparing EQ-5D-5L and IPOS among residents with malignant tumors in a community home hospice: a longitudinal study.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life in elderly people with hypertension and the estimation of minimally important difference using EQ-5D-5L in Hong Kong SAR, China.中国香港地区老年高血压患者的健康相关生活质量及使用 EQ-5D-5L 评估其最小重要差异。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01178-9. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.愿景“附加”提高 EQ-5D 的反应性:白内障手术研究的初步证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01156-w. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
3
The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics.
社区居家临终关怀中恶性肿瘤患者EQ-5D-5L与IPOS的比较:一项纵向研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 11;24(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01779-2.
4
SAHRANG: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Recovery and Galantamine - A pilot multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial.萨朗:蛛网膜下腔出血康复与加兰他敏——一项多中心随机安慰剂对照试验试点研究
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 1:rs.3.rs-6198782. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6198782/v1.
5
The psychometric properties of the amharic version of EuroQoL five-dimensions-five level among Ethiopian cervical cancer patients.埃塞俄比亚宫颈癌患者使用阿姆哈拉语版欧洲五维健康量表的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Nov 14;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02305-3.
6
Effects of Palliative Surgical Treatment for Spinal Metastases on the Patient's Quality of Life With a Focus on the Segment of the Metastasis: A Prospective Multicenter Study.脊柱转移瘤姑息性手术治疗对患者生活质量的影响:一项聚焦转移部位的前瞻性多中心研究
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2286-2299. doi: 10.1177/21925682241297948. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
7
Patient-reported outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者报告结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 28;14(1):25752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77210-2.
8
COVID-19 and self-reported health of the Norwegian adult general population: A longitudinal study 3 months before and 9 months into the pandemic.COVID-19 与挪威成年普通人群自报健康状况:大流行前 3 个月和大流行后 9 个月的纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312201. eCollection 2024.
9
Estimating the minimally important difference for the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer.估算癌症患者 EQ-5D-5L 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 的最小重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02294-3.
10
A scoping review of the use of minimally important difference of EQ-5D utility index and EQ-VAS scores in health technology assessment.运用 EQ-5D 效用指数和 EQ-VAS 评分的最小重要差值进行健康技术评估的范围性回顾。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02272-9.
急性哮喘患者 EQ-5D-5L、AQL-5D 和定制 TTO 的结构效度和反应度。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):619-627. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02345-z. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
4
Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.了解患者报告结局测量的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;161(4):551-560. doi: 10.1177/0194599819852604. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures.桡骨远端骨折患者PROMIS身体功能的最小临床重要差异
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jun;44(6):454-459.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
6
Changes in health-related quality of life of Chinese populations measured by the EQ-5D-3 L: a comparison of the 2008 and 2013 National Health Services Surveys.2008 年和 2013 年国家卫生服务调查中测量的中国人群健康相关生活质量的变化: EQ-5D-3L 的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Mar 11;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1109-x.
7
Health-related quality of life among rural men and women with hypertension: assessment by the EQ-5D-5L in Jiangsu, China.中国江苏农村高血压患者的健康相关生活质量:EQ-5D-5L 评估。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2069-2080. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02139-3. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
8
The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take.最小临床重要差异:何去何从。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Jun;26(6):850-855. doi: 10.1111/ene.13941. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire.明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷的反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 14;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1104-2.
10
EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.EQ-5D-5L 比 EQ-5D-3L 更能反映白内障手术治疗获益。
Patient. 2019 Aug;12(4):383-392. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-00354-7.