• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示生命末期直接照护者的无形网络:一项人群研究。

Uncovering an invisible network of direct caregivers at the end of life: a population study.

机构信息

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;27(7):608-15. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483664. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/0269216313483664
PMID:23587738
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most palliative care research about caregivers relies on reports from spouses or adult children. Some recent clinical reports have noted the assistance provided by other family members and friends.

AIM

This population study aims to define the people who actually provide care at the end of life.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A South Australian study conducted an annual randomized health population survey (n=23,706) over a 7 year period. A sample was obtained of self-identifying people who had someone close to them die and 'expected' death in the last 5 years (n=7915). Data were standardised to population norms for gender, 10-year age group, socioeconomic status, and region of residence.

RESULTS

People of all ages indicated they provided 'hands on' care at the end of life. Extended family members (not first degree relatives) and friends accounted for more than half (n=1133/2028; 55.9%) of identified hands-on caregivers. These people came from the entire age range of the adult community. The period of time for which care was provided was shorter for this group of caregivers. People with extended family or friends providing care, were much more likely to be supported to die at home compared to having a spousal carer.

CONCLUSION

This substantial network of caregivers who are mainly invisible to the health team provide the majority of care. Hospice and palliative care services need to create specific ways of identifying and engaging this cohort in order to ensure they are receiving adequate support in the role. Relying on 'next-of-kin' status in research will not identify them.

摘要

背景

大多数姑息治疗研究都依赖于配偶或成年子女对护理人员的报告。一些最近的临床报告指出了其他家庭成员和朋友提供的帮助。

目的

本人群研究旨在确定在生命末期实际提供护理的人员。

设置/参与者:南澳大利亚的一项研究在 7 年期间每年进行一次随机健康人群调查(n=23706)。从自我认同的身边有人去世并在过去 5 年内“预计”死亡的人群(n=7915)中抽取样本。数据按性别、10 年年龄组、社会经济地位和居住地区的人口规范进行标准化。

结果

各个年龄段的人都表示他们在生命末期提供了“实际”护理。大家庭成员(非直系亲属)和朋友占已确定的实际护理人员的一半以上(n=1133/2028;55.9%)。这些人来自成年社区的整个年龄范围。他们提供护理的时间比这组护理人员要短。有大家庭或朋友提供护理的人,与有配偶护理人员相比,更有可能在家中接受支持死亡。

结论

这个由主要不为医疗团队所关注的大量护理人员组成的网络提供了大部分护理。临终关怀和姑息治疗服务需要制定特定的方法来识别和参与这一组人,以确保他们在角色中得到足够的支持。在研究中依赖“近亲”身份将无法识别他们。

相似文献

1
Uncovering an invisible network of direct caregivers at the end of life: a population study.揭示生命末期直接照护者的无形网络:一项人群研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;27(7):608-15. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483664. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
2
Young caregivers in the end-of-life setting: a population-based profile of an emerging group.临终关怀中的年轻照护者:一个新兴群体的基于人群的特征描述。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;13(10):1225-35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0004.
3
Moving on: Factors associated with caregivers' bereavement adjustment using a random population-based face-to-face survey.继续前进:使用随机基于人群的面对面调查,与照顾者丧亲调整相关的因素。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):257-267. doi: 10.1177/0269216317717370. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Caregiver characteristics and bereavement needs: Findings from a population study.照顾者特征与丧亲需求:一项人群研究的结果
Palliat Med. 2017 May;31(5):465-474. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663855. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Defining distinct caregiver subpopulations by intensity of end-of-life care provided.通过所提供的临终关怀强度来界定不同的照护者亚群体。
Palliat Med. 2009 Jan;23(1):66-79. doi: 10.1177/0269216308098793. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
6
Gender differences among Canadian spousal caregivers at the end of life.加拿大临终配偶照顾者的性别差异。
Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Mar;17(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00813.x.
7
Populations who die without specialist palliative care: does lower uptake equate with unmet need?在没有专科姑息治疗的情况下死亡的人群:较低的接受率是否等同于未满足的需求?
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216307085182.
8
Caring at the end of life: do cancer caregivers differ from other caregivers?临终关怀:癌症护理者与其他护理者有何不同?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(5):513-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000495. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
9
Who provides care for people dying of cancer? A comparison of a rural and metropolitan cohort in a South Australian bereaved population study.谁为癌症临终患者提供护理?南澳大利亚丧亲人群研究中农村和城市队列的比较。
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Feb;23(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12168.
10
Life after placement: experiences of older rural caregivers after placing a family member into residential care.安置后的生活:农村老年照料者在将家庭成员安置到机构照料后的经历
Rural Remote Health. 2008 Jul-Sep;8(3):1030. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Patients and Caregivers in Advanced Illness Support One Another in Decision-Making for Patient Care? A Qualitative Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Dyads in Specialist Palliative Care.晚期疾病患者及其照料者如何在患者护理决策中相互支持?一项针对专科姑息治疗中患者与照料者二元组的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Sep 30;5(1):417-424. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0047. eCollection 2024.
2
Non-kin caregivers of terminally ill people: Contributions, experiences, and needs: A protocol for a mixed-methods study.终末期疾病患者的非亲属照护者:贡献、经历和需求:一项混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306282. eCollection 2024.
3
Place of Death for Adults Receiving Specialist Palliative Care in Their Last 3 Months of Life: Factors Associated With Preferred Place, Actual Place, and Place of Death Congruence.
成年人在生命的最后 3 个月接受专科姑息治疗后的死亡地点:与首选地点、实际地点和死亡地点一致性相关的因素。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul;39(3):184-193. doi: 10.1177/08258597241231042. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
4
Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A qualitative study.姑息治疗中患者和家庭照护者之间的相互支持:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1520-1528. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205130. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
The Impact of Public Health Restrictions on Young Caregivers and How They Navigated a Pandemic: Baseline Interviews from a Longitudinal Study Conducted in Ontario, Canada.公共卫生限制对年轻照顾者的影响,以及他们如何在大流行期间应对:在加拿大安大略省进行的纵向研究的基线访谈。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;20(14):6410. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146410.
6
"Out of the clear blue sky she tells me she loves me": Connection experiences between caregivers and people with dementia.“她突然告诉我她爱我”:护理人员和痴呆症患者之间的联系体验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2172-2183. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18297. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
7
Kinless Older Adults With Dementia: Qualitative Analysis of Data From the Adult Changes in Thought Study.无子女痴呆症老年患者:成人思维研究中数据的定性分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 May 26;78(6):1060-1072. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad030.
8
Quality of end-of-life care in general practice - a pre-post comparison of a two-tiered intervention.一般实践中的临终关怀质量 - 两级干预的前后比较。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 20;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01689-9.
9
Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.姑息治疗中的决策制定:患者和家庭照护者的一致性和不一致性——系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;13(4):374-385. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
10
Factors influencing adult carer support planning for unpaid caregiving at the end of life in Scotland: Qualitative insights from triangulated interviews and focus groups.影响苏格兰终末期无偿照护者获得成人照护者支持计划的因素:来自三角访谈和焦点小组的定性见解。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):1422-1432. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13472. Epub 2021 Aug 24.