文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

姑息治疗中的决策制定:患者和家庭照护者的一致性和不一致性——系统评价和叙述性综合。

Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.

机构信息

Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;13(4):374-385. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525. Epub 2022 Mar 22.


DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525
PMID:35318213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804031/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision-making in palliative care usually involves both patients and family caregivers. However, how concordance and discordance in decision-making manifest and function between patients and family caregivers in palliative care is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify key factors and/or processes which underpin concordance and/or discordance between patients and family caregivers with respect to their preferences for and decisions about palliative care; and ascertain how patients and family caregivers manage discordance in decision-making in palliative care. METHODS: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of original studies published in full between January 2000 and June 2021 was conducted using the following databases: Embase; Medline; CINAHL; AMED; Web of Science; PsycINFO; PsycARTICLES; and Social Sciences Full Text. RESULTS: After full-text review, 39 studies were included in the synthesis. Studies focused primarily on end-of-life care and on patient and family caregiver preferences for patient care. We found that discordance between patients and family caregivers in palliative care can manifest in relational conflict and can result from a lack of awareness of and communication about each other's preferences for care. Patients' advancing illness and impending death together with open dialogue about future care including advance care planning can foster consensus between patients and family caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and family caregivers in palliative care can accommodate each other's preferences for care. Further research is needed to fully understand how patients and family caregivers move towards consensus in the context of advancing illness.

摘要

背景:在姑息治疗中,决策通常涉及患者和家庭照顾者。然而,姑息治疗中患者和家庭照顾者在决策方面的一致性和分歧是如何表现和发挥作用的,目前还不是很清楚。

目的:确定支持姑息治疗中患者和家庭照顾者在姑息治疗偏好和决策方面的一致性和分歧的关键因素和/或过程;并确定患者和家庭照顾者如何管理姑息治疗中决策方面的分歧。

方法:对 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间发表的原始研究进行了系统评价和叙述性综合,使用了以下数据库:Embase;Medline;CINAHL;AMED;Web of Science;PsycINFO;PsycARTICLES;和 Social Sciences Full Text。

结果:经过全文审查,有 39 项研究被纳入综合分析。这些研究主要集中在临终关怀以及患者和家庭照顾者对患者护理的偏好上。我们发现,姑息治疗中患者和家庭照顾者之间的分歧可能表现为关系冲突,并可能源于对彼此护理偏好缺乏了解和沟通。患者病情的进展和即将死亡,以及对未来护理包括预先护理计划的开放对话,可以促进患者和家庭照顾者之间的共识。

结论:姑息治疗中的患者和家庭照顾者可以相互适应对方的护理偏好。需要进一步的研究来充分了解在病情进展的背景下,患者和家庭照顾者如何达成共识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480d/10804031/e43fade0d55c/bmjspcare-2022-003525f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480d/10804031/e43fade0d55c/bmjspcare-2022-003525f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480d/10804031/e43fade0d55c/bmjspcare-2022-003525f01.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023-12

[2]
Attitudes and preferences towards palliative and end of life care in patients with advanced illness and their family caregivers in Latin America: A mixed studies systematic review.

Palliat Med. 2021-9

[3]
Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Palliat Med. 2021-5

[4]
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[5]
Discordance among patient preferences, caregiver preferences, and caregiver predictions of patient preferences regarding disclosure of terminal status and end-of-life choices.

Psychooncology. 2015-2

[6]
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-9-30

[7]
Decision-making among patients and their family in ALS care: a review.

Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018-5

[8]
The preferences and perspectives of family caregivers towards place of care for their relatives at the end-of-life. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative evidence.

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016-12

[9]
Effectiveness of Dyadic Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024-6

[10]
Examining Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision Making and Subsequent Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
'That's why I wanted him to go on dialysis' - a qualitative inductive thematic analysis of older patients' and their family members' perspectives on kidney failure treatment decision-making.

BMC Nephrol. 2025-7-9

[2]
Associated factors of home hospice care utilization by the terminally ill older adults: a mixed-methods study.

Front Public Health. 2025-6-18

[3]
Advance care planning.

Clin Med (Lond). 2025-6-18

[4]
Palliative Care and Advanced Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Not Just End-of-Life Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation. 2025-5-27

[5]
The Paradox of Choice in Palliative Care Decision-Making in Managed Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Study.

Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2025-2

[6]
Families' Experiences of Surrogate Decision-Making and Challenges of Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Cureus. 2025-3-1

[7]
Patient-caregiver concordance on death preparedness over Taiwanese cancer patients' last 6 months.

Oncologist. 2025-7-4

[8]
Interventions for family involvement enhance end-of-life care for hospitalized patients: an integrative review.

BMC Nurs. 2024-12-18

[9]
Healthcare Professionals' Perspective on Supporting Patients and Family Caregivers in End-Of-Life Care Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024-11-1

[10]
How Do Patients and Caregivers in Advanced Illness Support One Another in Decision-Making for Patient Care? A Qualitative Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Dyads in Specialist Palliative Care.

Palliat Med Rep. 2024-9-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Patient participation in shared decision-making in palliative care - an integrative review.

J Clin Nurs. 2021-12

[2]
Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Palliat Med. 2021-5

[3]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[4]
Discrete choice experiment for eliciting preference for health services for patients with ALS and their informal caregivers.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021-3-9

[5]
The tension between carrying a burden and feeling like a burden: a qualitative study of informal caregivers' and care recipients' experiences after patient discharge from hospital.

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021-12

[6]
Supportive care needs and service use during palliative care in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective longitudinal study.

Support Care Cancer. 2021-3

[7]
Barriers to advance care planning: a qualitative study of seriously ill Chinese patients and their families.

BMC Palliat Care. 2020-6-8

[8]
Redefining Palliative Care-A New Consensus-Based Definition.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020-10

[9]
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-2-27

[10]
Palliative Care for Family Caregivers.

J Clin Oncol. 2020-2-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索