Department of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 4-57 Urafune, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan.
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):296-306. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1265-2.
Breastfeeding self-efficacy interventions are important for improving breastfeeding outcomes. However, the circumstances that may influence the effectiveness of the interventions are unclear, especially in the context of hospitals with suboptimal infant feeding practices. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of a self-efficacy intervention on breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding, and further assessed the difference in its effect by hospital-routine type. In this intervention study with a control group, 781 pregnant women were recruited from 2 "Baby-Friendly"-certified hospitals (BFH) and 2 non-Baby-Friendly Hospitals (nBFH) in Japan, and were allocated to an intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group were provided with a breastfeeding self-efficacy workbook in their third trimester. The primary outcome was breastfeeding self-efficacy and the secondary outcome was infant feeding status. All analyses were stratified by the type of hospital, BFH or nBFH. In BFHs, the intervention improved both breastfeeding self-efficacy through 4 weeks postpartum (p = 0.037) and the exclusive breastfeeding rate at 4 weeks postpartum (AOR 2.32, 95 % CI 1.01-5.33). In nBFHs, however, no positive effect was observed on breastfeeding self-efficacy (p = 0.982) or on the exclusive breastfeeding rate at 4 weeks postpartum (AOR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.52-1.81); in nBFHs, supplementation was provided for breastfed infants and the mother and infant were separated in the vast majority of cases. Infant feeding status at 12 weeks was not improved in either hospital type. The intervention improved breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding at 4 weeks postpartum only in BFHs. When breastfeeding self-efficacy interventions are implemented, hospital infant feeding practices may need to be optimized beforehand.
母乳喂养自我效能干预对于改善母乳喂养结果非常重要。然而,影响干预效果的因素尚不清楚,尤其是在婴儿喂养实践不佳的医院环境中。因此,我们旨在评估自我效能干预对母乳喂养自我效能和纯母乳喂养的影响,并进一步评估其对医院常规类型的影响差异。在这项具有对照组的干预研究中,我们从日本的 2 家“婴儿友好型”认证医院(BFH)和 2 家非婴儿友好型医院(nBFH)招募了 781 名孕妇,并将其分配到干预组或对照组。干预组的参与者在孕晚期获得了一本母乳喂养自我效能手册。主要结局是母乳喂养自我效能,次要结局是婴儿喂养状况。所有分析均按医院类型(BFH 或 nBFH)进行分层。在 BFH 中,干预措施通过产后 4 周提高了母乳喂养自我效能(p=0.037)和产后 4 周的纯母乳喂养率(OR 2.32,95%CI 1.01-5.33)。然而,在 nBFH 中,母乳喂养自我效能(p=0.982)或产后 4 周的纯母乳喂养率(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.52-1.81)没有观察到积极效果;在 nBFH 中,绝大多数情况下,母乳喂养的婴儿都接受了补充喂养,母婴也被分开。在两种类型的医院中,12 周时的婴儿喂养状况均未得到改善。干预措施仅在 BFH 中提高了产后 4 周时的母乳喂养自我效能和纯母乳喂养率。在实施母乳喂养自我效能干预措施时,可能需要事先优化医院的婴儿喂养实践。