Julius Centre for Patient Oriented Research, The University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Sep 18;12(Spec Ed Integrated Care Pathways):e192. doi: 10.5334/ijic.812. Print 2012 Jan.
This article addresses first the definition of a (care) pathway, and then follows a description of theories since the 1950s. It ends with a discussion of theoretical advantages and disadvantages of care pathways for patients and professionals. The objective of this paper is to provide a theoretical base for empirical studies on care pathways. The knowledge for this chapter is based on several books on pathways, which we found by searching in the digital encyclopedia Wikipedia. Although this is not usual in scientific publications, this method was used because books are not searchable by databases as Pubmed. From 2005, we performed a literature search on Pubmed and other literature databases, and with the keywords integrated care pathway, clinical pathway, critical pathway, theory, research, and evaluation. One of the inspirational sources was the website of the European Pathway Association (EPA) and its journal International Journal of Care Pathways. The authors visited several sites for this paper. These are mentioned as illustration of a concept or theory. Most of them have English websites with more information. The URLs of these websites are not mentioned in this paper as a reference, because the content of them changes fast, sometimes every day.
本文首先定义了(护理)路径,然后描述了自 20 世纪 50 年代以来的相关理论。最后,讨论了护理路径对患者和专业人员的理论优缺点。本文的目的是为护理路径的实证研究提供理论基础。这一章的知识是基于我们在数字百科全书维基百科中搜索到的几本关于路径的书籍。尽管这种方法在科学出版物中并不常见,但由于书籍不能像 Pubmed 那样在数据库中搜索,所以我们使用了这种方法。从 2005 年开始,我们在 Pubmed 和其他文献数据库上进行了文献检索,并使用了综合护理路径、临床路径、关键路径、理论、研究和评估等关键词。灵感来源之一是欧洲路径协会(EPA)的网站及其期刊《国际护理路径杂志》。作者为本文访问了多个网站。这些网站被提及是为了说明一个概念或理论。其中大多数都有英文网站,提供更多信息。由于这些网站的内容变化很快,有时每天都在变化,因此本文没有提及这些网站的网址作为参考。