Suppr超能文献

以可委托专业活动为基础评估内科住院医师的能力:一项可行性研究。

Developing entrustable professional activities as the basis for assessment of competence in an internal medicine residency: a feasibility study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug;28(8):1110-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2372-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Graduate medical education programs assess trainees' performance to determine readiness for unsupervised practice. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a novel approach for assessing performance of core professional tasks.

AIM

To describe a pilot and feasibility evaluation of two EPAs for competency-based assessment in internal medicine (IM) residency.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Post-graduate year-1 interns (PGY-1s) and attendings at a large internal medicine (IM) residency program.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Two Entrustable professional activities (EPA) assessments (Discharge, Family Meeting) were piloted.

PROGRAM FEASIBILITY EVALUATION

Twenty-eight out of 43 (65.1 %) PGY-1 s and 32/43 (74.4 %) attendings completed surveys about the Discharge EPA experience. Most who completed the EPA assessment (10/12, 83.8 %, PGY-1s; 9/11, 83.3 %, attendings) agreed it facilitated useful feedback discussions. For the Family Meeting EPA, 16/26 (61.5 %) PGY-1s completed surveys, and most who participated (9/12 PGY1s, 75 %) reported it improved attention to family meeting education, although only half recommended continuing the EPA assessment.

DISCUSSION

From piloting two EPA assessments in a large IM residency, we recognized our reminder systems and time dedicated for completing EPA requirements as inadequate. Collaboration around patient safety and palliative care with relevant clinical services has enhanced implementation and buy-in. We will evaluate how well EPA-based assessment serves the intended purpose of capturing trainees' trustworthiness to conduct activities unsupervised.

摘要

背景

研究生医学教育计划评估学员的表现,以确定他们是否准备好进行无监督的实践。可委托的专业活动(EPAs)是评估核心专业任务表现的一种新方法。

目的

描述一项针对内科住院医师规范化培训(IM)的两项基于能力的 EPA 的试点和可行性评估。

设置/参与者:一名内科住院医师规范化培训的一年级住院医师(PGY-1)和主治医生。

项目描述

两个可委托的专业活动(EPA)评估(出院、家庭会议)进行了试点。

项目可行性评估

在 43 名 PGY-1 中,有 28 名(65.1%)和 32/43 名主治医生(74.4%)完成了关于出院 EPA 经验的调查。大多数完成 EPA 评估的人(10/12,PGY-1,83.8%;9/11,主治医生,83.3%)认为它促进了有用的反馈讨论。对于家庭会议 EPA,16/26(61.5%)的 PGY-1 完成了调查,大多数参与者(PGY1 中的 9/12,75%)报告说它提高了对家庭会议教育的关注,尽管只有一半的人建议继续进行 EPA 评估。

讨论

通过在一个大型 IM 住院医师规范化培训中试点两个 EPA 评估,我们认识到我们的提醒系统和专门用于完成 EPA 要求的时间不足。与相关临床服务部门就患者安全和姑息治疗进行合作,增强了实施和认可。我们将评估基于 EPA 的评估在多大程度上符合捕捉学员在独立开展活动时的可信度的预期目的。

相似文献

4
Feasibility, and validity aspects of Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-based assessment in general practice training.
Educ Prim Care. 2022 Mar;33(2):69-76. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2021.1951127. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Development and Pilot Testing of Entrustable Professional Activities for US Anesthesiology Residency Training.
Anesth Analg. 2021 Jun 1;132(6):1579-1591. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005434.
9
Longitudinal Assessment of Resident Performance Using Entrustable Professional Activities.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19316.
10
Validity Evidence for ENTRUST as an Assessment of Surgical Decision-Making for the Inguinal Hernia Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA).
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e202-e212. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
National pilot of entrustable professional activities in pathology residency training.
Acad Pathol. 2024 Mar 21;11(2):100110. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100110. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
5
Longitudinal survey of self-reported level of entrustment across the first year of clinical practice.
HRB Open Res. 2022 Jan 20;5:9. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13487.1. eCollection 2022.
6
A Review of Entrustable Professional Activities in Pharmacy Education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe8872. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8872. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Feasibility of an Entrustable Professional Activity for Pathology Resident Frozen Section Training.
Acad Pathol. 2021 Aug 31;8:23742895211041757. doi: 10.1177/23742895211041757. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Entrustability levels of general internal medicine residents.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02624-9.
9
Entrustable Professional Activities in Hematopathology Pathology Fellowship Training: Consensus Design and Proposal.
Acad Pathol. 2021 Feb 17;8:2374289521990823. doi: 10.1177/2374289521990823. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying entrustable professional activities in internal medicine training.
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):54-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00060.1.
2
The patient handover as an entrustable professional activity: adding meaning in teaching and practice.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i9-12. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001213.
3
The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1051-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1200117. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
4
Beyond competencies and milestones: adding meaning through context.
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep;2(3):419-22. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00127.1.
7
Twelve tips for teaching reflection at all levels of medical education.
Med Teach. 2011;33(3):200-5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507714. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
9
Medical competence: the interplay between individual ability and the health care environment.
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):669-75. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500897.
10
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验