Kopak Albert M, Metze Amanda V, Hoffmann Norman G
Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2014 Jun;58(6):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13485929. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
This study explored the compatibility between the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence with the initial (DSM-5.0) and most recent (DSM-5.1) proposed diagnostic criteria. Data drawn from a structured clinical interview used in the assessment of 6,871 male and 801 female state prison inmates were analyzed according to the existing and proposed diagnostic formulations. The greatest congruence was observed in cases that received no diagnosis according to the DSM-IV-TR because these also received no diagnosis in the DSM-5.1. Most cases with a current dependence diagnosis received a severe designation according to the proposed criteria. However, those with an abuse diagnosis were divided across various DSM-5.1 severity levels. Some diagnostic criteria were nearly universally endorsed among those classified with the highest severity levels, which indicated that some criteria may serve as cardinal indicators of a severe alcohol use disorder (SAUD). Additional diagnostic criteria not yet suggested for inclusion in the DSM (i.e., preoccupation with alcohol use and alcohol use to relieve emotional distress) were also evaluated. Evidence demonstrated these two criteria served as functional indicators of alcohol use disorder (AUD). This assessment approach can be used to establish appropriate treatment objectives based on the severity of diagnosed AUDs. Meeting these treatment objectives, especially in a correctional population, may have important implications for future offending. Recommendations are made for prospective research in this area.
本研究探讨了当前《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版,修订版;DSM-IV-TR)中酒精滥用和依赖的诊断标准与最初提议的(DSM-5.0)和最新提议的(DSM-5.1)诊断标准之间的兼容性。根据现有的和提议的诊断公式,对从用于评估6871名男性和801名女性州立监狱囚犯的结构化临床访谈中获取的数据进行了分析。在根据DSM-IV-TR未获得诊断的病例中观察到最大的一致性,因为这些病例在DSM-5.1中也未获得诊断。大多数目前诊断为依赖的病例根据提议的标准被判定为严重。然而,那些诊断为滥用的病例在DSM-5.1的不同严重程度水平上分布不均。一些诊断标准在被归类为最高严重程度水平的人群中几乎得到普遍认可,这表明一些标准可能是严重酒精使用障碍(SAUD)的主要指标。还评估了尚未建议纳入DSM的其他诊断标准(即对酒精使用的过度关注和为缓解情绪困扰而饮酒)。证据表明这两个标准是酒精使用障碍(AUD)的功能指标。这种评估方法可用于根据已诊断的AUD的严重程度确定适当的治疗目标。实现这些治疗目标,尤其是在教养人群中,可能对未来的犯罪行为具有重要意义。为此领域的前瞻性研究提出了建议。