Departments of Psychiatry and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:485-92. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S42745. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of novel antipsychotics in the treatment of psychotic depression.
Consecutive patients who were admitted (n = 51) with a confirmed diagnosis of major depression with psychotic features (delusions or hallucinations or both) participated in this open-label, naturalistic study. All patients were treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (citalopram or venlafaxine extended release [XR]), and atypical antipsychotic agents were added, as tolerated, during the first week of initiating the citalopram or venlafaxine. There were patients (n = 16) who received risperidone, who received quetiapine (n = 20), and who received olanzapine (n = 15), as an adjunctive treatment to either citalopram or venlafaxine for at least 8 weeks. Outcome measures included the Clinical Global Impression-Severity subscale (CGI-S), as the primary outcome measure, as well as the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-21 item (HAM-D21) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Tolerance to treatments and weight changes were monitored over the period of the trial.
All patients completed the trial with no drop outs. At 8 weeks, there was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) clinical improvement in all outcome measures for both the depressive and psychotic symptoms, for all three groups of atypical adjunctive treatments. Utilizing analysis of variance (ANOVA), there were no significant differences between the three adjunctive treatment groups in outcome measures. The three antipsychotic agents were equally tolerated. At 8 weeks there was slight increase in weight in the three treatment groups, which was statistically significant (P > .01) in the olanzapine group.
Quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine, given as adjunctive treatment with SSRIS or SNRIs can significantly and equally improve depressive and psychotic symptoms, in the short-term treatment of major depression with psychotic features. The author recommends that large controlled trials be conducted to examine the differences in long-term efficacy and tolerance between the atypical antipsychotic agents, in the treatment of major depression with or without psychotic features.
本研究旨在比较新型抗精神病药物治疗精神病性抑郁症的疗效。
连续入组(n=51)确诊为伴有精神病性特征(妄想或幻觉或两者兼有)的重性抑郁障碍患者参与本项开放性、自然性研究。所有患者均接受选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)(西酞普兰或文拉法辛缓释剂[XR])治疗,在开始使用西酞普兰或文拉法辛的第 1 周内,根据耐受情况加用非典型抗精神病药物。患者(n=16)接受利培酮,患者(n=20)接受喹硫平,患者(n=15)接受奥氮平,作为西酞普兰或文拉法辛的附加治疗,至少治疗 8 周。结局指标包括作为主要结局指标的临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S),以及汉密尔顿抑郁量表-21 项(HAM-D21)和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)。在试验期间监测治疗的耐受性和体重变化。
所有患者均完成试验,无脱落。8 周时,三组非典型附加治疗的抑郁和精神病性症状均有统计学显著(P<0.001)的临床改善。采用方差分析(ANOVA),三组附加治疗组在结局指标上无显著差异。三种抗精神病药物的耐受性均相当。8 周时,三组治疗的体重均略有增加,奥氮平组的增加有统计学显著(P>.01)。
喹硫平、利培酮和奥氮平作为 SSRIs 或 SNRIs 的附加治疗,可在短期内显著改善伴有精神病性特征的重性抑郁障碍的抑郁和精神病性症状。作者建议开展大型对照试验,以检验在伴有或不伴有精神病性特征的重性抑郁障碍治疗中,非典型抗精神病药物的长期疗效和耐受性差异。