• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强制性营养素分析和营养标签制备的实验室性能。

Laboratory performance on analysis of mandatory nutrients and preparation of nutrition labelling.

机构信息

Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Putthamonthon 4, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

出版信息

Food Chem. 2013 Oct 1;140(3):598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.127. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.127
PMID:23601413
Abstract

This study assessed the performance of 17 laboratories in Thailand in analysing mandatory nutrients in salted, fried broad bean and in using data to prepare nutrition labels. Nutrient levels in the test material, as robust mean (x(∗)) and robust standard deviation (s(∗)), were assigned in line with ISO 13528. Data obtained from the laboratories were statistically evaluated against these values. Laboratories with satisfactory, questionable and unsatisfactory results for each nutrient were identified based on robust z-score. Laboratories achieving satisfactory analytical results (z-score⩽2) were for lipid, 82%; protein, 85%; Na, 82%; Ca, 62%; Fe, 81%; ash, 70%; and moisture, 62%. Reference values for some nutrients in broad bean powder were developed using data from satisfactorily performing laboratories. Less than 20% of the laboratories demonstrated good performance in preparing nutrition labels. Common mistakes were the nutrition information format, estimation of serving size and serving(s) per package.

摘要

本研究评估了泰国 17 家实验室在分析盐腌、油炸蚕豆中强制营养素以及利用数据来准备营养标签方面的表现。根据 ISO 13528,测试材料中的营养素水平以稳健均值(x())和稳健标准差(s())的形式分配。从实验室获得的数据与这些值进行了统计学评估。根据稳健 z 分数,确定了每个营养素的满意、有疑问和不满意的实验室。在脂质、蛋白质、Na、Ca、Fe、灰分和水分方面取得满意分析结果(z 分数⩽2)的实验室分别为 82%、85%、82%、62%、81%、70%和 62%。使用表现良好的实验室的数据,为蚕豆粉中的一些营养素制定了参考值。不到 20%的实验室在准备营养标签方面表现良好。常见错误是营养信息格式、估计食用份量和每份包装的食用份量。

相似文献

1
Laboratory performance on analysis of mandatory nutrients and preparation of nutrition labelling.强制性营养素分析和营养标签制备的实验室性能。
Food Chem. 2013 Oct 1;140(3):598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.127. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Proficiency testing for the evaluation of the ability of European Union-National Reference laboratories to determine aflatoxin M1 in milk at levels corresponding to the new European Union legislation.能力验证,用于评估欧盟国家参考实验室按照新的欧盟法规测定牛奶中黄曲霉毒素M1的能力。
Food Addit Contam. 2001 May;18(5):405-15. doi: 10.1080/02652030121366.
3
[Quality assurance for analytical laboratories].[分析实验室的质量保证]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1993;44(2-3):123-32.
4
[Proficiency Testing Schemes for Food Nutrition Analysis in Japan (2017-2018)].日本食品营养分析能力验证计划(2017 - 2018年)
Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020;61(2):63-71. doi: 10.3358/shokueishi.61.63.
5
Precision parameters of methods of analysis required for nutrition labeling. Part I. Major nutrients.营养标签所需分析方法的精密度参数。第一部分。主要营养素。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990 Sep-Oct;73(5):661-80.
6
Should nutrient profiles be based on 100 g, 100 kcal or serving size?营养成分表应以100克、100千卡还是一份的量为基础?
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jul;63(7):898-904. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.53. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
7
[Study on the proficiency testing program of pharmaceutical preparation analysis].
Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2012 Jun;47(6):769-72.
8
[The Istituto Superiore di Sanità, the organization responsible for the evaluation and accreditation of food product testing laboratories ].[意大利高等卫生研究院,负责食品检测实验室评估和认证的组织]
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2002;38(1):63-7.
9
[Proficiency testing for chemical analytical laboratories--general principles concerning organization and assessment of results].化学分析实验室能力验证——关于结果组织与评估的一般原则
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1995;46(2):105-12.
10
Manuals of food quality control. 1. The food control laboratory. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.食品质量控制手册。1. 食品控制实验室。联合国粮食及农业组织。
FAO Food Nutr Pap. 1986;14(1 Rev 1):1-67.

引用本文的文献

1
A reliable quantification of organophosphorus pesticides in brown rice samples for proficiency testing using Japanese official analytical method, QuEChERS, and modified QuEChERS combined with isotope dilution mass spectrometry.使用日本官方分析方法、QuEChERS以及结合同位素稀释质谱法的改良QuEChERS对糙米样品中的有机磷农药进行可靠定量,以用于能力验证。
J Pestic Sci. 2024 Aug 20;49(3):179-185. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D24-021.
2
Internationally harmonized certified reference materials and proficiency testings for pesticide residue analysis.农药残留分析的国际协调认证参考物质和能力验证
J Pestic Sci. 2021 Aug 20;46(3):297-303. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.J21-03.
3
Proficiency testing by the National Metrology Institute of Japan for quantification of pesticide residues in grain samples from 2012 to 2018.
日本国家计量院对2012年至2018年谷物样品中农药残留量的能力验证。
J Pestic Sci. 2019 Aug 20;44(3):192-199. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D19-031.