Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Clin Imaging. 2013 May-Jun;37(3):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
Our purpose is to compare ultrasound and fluoroscopic-guided approaches to the glenohumeral joint at the rotator cuff interval for magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the shoulder. Forty consecutive patients were prospectively studied. 20 patients underwent ultrasound-guided and 20 patients underwent fluoroscopic guided injection. Successful rate of ultrasound guidance is 95%. No significant difference in pain score and duration of injection between two methods (P>.05). Ultrasound-guided rotator cuff interval injection of the glenohumeral joint for MR arthrography is comparable with fluoroscopic-guided injection. Ultrasound is the preferred method as there is no ionizing radiation.
我们的目的是比较超声和荧光透视引导下经肩袖间隙至盂肱关节行磁共振（MR）关节造影的方法。连续前瞻性研究了 40 例患者。20 例行超声引导下注射，20 例行荧光透视引导下注射。超声引导的成功率为 95%。两种方法的疼痛评分和注射持续时间无显著差异（P＞0.05）。超声引导下盂肱关节肩袖间隙注射行 MR 关节造影与荧光透视引导下注射效果相当。由于没有放射性，超声是首选方法。
