• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜入路与传统开放手术治疗梗阻性左半结肠癌:一项随机试验的长期随访

Endo-laparoscopic approach versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial.

作者信息

Tung Karen Lok Man, Cheung Hester Yui Shan, Ng Lawrence Wing Chiu, Chung Cliff Chi Chiu, Li Michael Ka Wah

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 May;6(2):78-81. doi: 10.1111/ases.12030.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12030
PMID:23601995
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We previously conducted a randomized trial comparing the endo-laparoscopic approach (i.e. placing self-expanding metallic stents followed by laparoscopic resection) and conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer. This study is a follow-up of the previous randomized trial and aims to report the long-term outcomes of the two groups.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients from the randomized trial were followed up in an outpatient clinic with regular monitoring. Patients were compared for clinicopathological variables, disease recurrence and survival rates.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological details were comparable between the two groups. During the median follow-up periods of 32 months for the open group and 65 months endo-laparoscopic group, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in disease recurrence rate, 5-year overall survival (27% vs 48%, P = 0.076) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (48% vs 52%, P = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Besides being a safe bridge to subsequent elective laparoscopic surgery, preoperative self-expanding metallic stents insertion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes and patient survival. Based on our data, the endo-laparoscopic approach is the treatment of choice for patients presenting with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction.

摘要

引言

我们之前进行了一项随机试验,比较了内镜-腹腔镜联合手术方法(即先放置自膨式金属支架,随后进行腹腔镜切除术)与传统开放手术治疗左侧结肠癌梗阻的效果。本研究是之前随机试验的随访,旨在报告两组的长期结果。

方法

对随机试验中的48例患者进行门诊随访并定期监测。比较两组患者的临床病理变量、疾病复发情况和生存率。

结果

两组的临床病理细节具有可比性。开放手术组的中位随访期为32个月,内镜-腹腔镜联合手术组为65个月,两组在疾病复发率、5年总生存率(27%对48%,P = 0.076)和5年无病生存率(48%对52%,P = 0.63)方面均未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

术前插入自膨式金属支架除了是后续择期腹腔镜手术的安全桥梁外,不会对肿瘤学结局和患者生存产生不利影响。根据我们的数据,内镜-腹腔镜联合手术方法是左侧结肠癌恶性梗阻患者的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Endo-laparoscopic approach versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial.腹腔镜入路与传统开放手术治疗梗阻性左半结肠癌:一项随机试验的长期随访
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 May;6(2):78-81. doi: 10.1111/ases.12030.
2
Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗梗阻性左半结肠癌的随机对照试验
Arch Surg. 2009 Dec;144(12):1127-32. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.216.
3
[A preliminary study of stenting followed by laparoscopic surgery for obstructing left-sided colon cancer].[支架置入后行腹腔镜手术治疗左侧梗阻性结肠癌的初步研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;14(1):40-3.
4
Long-term outcome of stenting as a bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction.作为急性左侧恶性结肠梗阻手术桥梁的支架置入术的长期疗效
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):788-93. doi: 10.1111/codi.12666.
5
Local recurrence after stenting for obstructing left-sided colonic cancer.支架置入治疗左半结肠癌梗阻后局部复发。
Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1805-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9297.
6
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
7
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
8
Results of laparoscopic vs open resections for colon cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.对结肠癌患者进行腹腔镜手术与开放手术切除的结果,最短随访时间为3年。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Aug;16(8):1158-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8333-1. Epub 2002 May 3.
9
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection following stent insertion for obstructing colon cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.支架置入后腹腔镜与开放手术治疗梗阻性结肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3937-3944. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06680-7. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的比较。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
An evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic colon stenting in the treatment of obstructive left colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下结肠支架置入术治疗左半结肠癌梗阻的有效性和安全性评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 4;410(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03762-0.
2
Transforming outcomes: the pivotal role of self-expanding metal stents in right- and left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions-bridge to surgery: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.改善治疗结果:自膨式金属支架在左右侧恶性结直肠梗阻通向手术的桥梁中所起的关键作用:一项全面综述与荟萃分析
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):240-252. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.120. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Upfront Surgery vs. Endoscopic Stenting Bridge to Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Obstructive Left Colon Cancer: Analysis of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes.
upfront手术与内镜支架置入桥接微创手术治疗梗阻性左半结肠癌:手术及肿瘤学结局分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;16(23):3895. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233895.
4
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in non-elite cases.非精英病例中腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的疗效与安全性
Surg Today. 2025 May;55(5):676-684. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02951-6. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.结肠癌:2023年韩国诊断与治疗临床实践指南
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Apr;40(2):89-113. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Stenting as bridge to surgery versus upfront emergency resection for non-metastatic left sided obstructing colorectal cancer: risk of peritoneal recurrence and long-term outcomes.支架置入术桥接手术与非转移性左侧梗阻性结直肠癌的急诊根治性切除术比较:腹膜复发风险和长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2632-2640. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10780-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
Colonic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency rection for malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.结直肠支架作为恶性左半结直肠梗阻手术的桥梁与急症手术:一项随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36078. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036078.
8
Management of left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta-analysis.有治愈意图的左侧恶性结直肠梗阻的处理:网络荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4159-4178. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09929-4. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
9
A retrospective evaluation of short-term results from colonic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colonic obstruction.回顾性评估结肠支架置入术作为择期手术与急症手术治疗恶性结肠梗阻的短期效果。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 28;13(1):1600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28685-y.
10
Oncologic safety of colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: Current evidence and prospects.结肠支架置入术作为左侧恶性结肠梗阻手术桥梁的肿瘤学安全性:当前证据与前景
World J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 24;13(12):943-956. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.943.