Suppr超能文献

高效液相色谱法测定甘草制品中的赭曲霉毒素 A。第一部分:糖果行业常用方法的能力验证。

Determination of ochratoxin A in liquorice products using HPLC based analytical methods. Part I: proficiency test of methods commonly used by the confectionary industry.

机构信息

Lebensmittelchemisches Institut (LCI) des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Süßwarenindustrie e.V., Adamsstraße 52-54, 51063, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Mycotoxin Res. 2010 May;26(2):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s12550-010-0045-8. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

Abstract

A European proficiency test series was accomplished on behalf of the CAOBISCO (Association of the Chocolate, Biscuit and Confectionery Industries of the EU) expert group on ochratoxin A to assess the performance of laboratories in measuring ochratoxin A in samples of various liquorice products. In addition, the impact of the extraction type (mainly with or without the use of halogenated solvents) was to be evaluated. Four different test samples (two liquorice powders and two liquorice pastes) were tested for sufficient homogeneity and distributed to 15 laboratories in 8 countries in Europe. The results were analysed using standard proficiency testing statistical procedures and laboratories were awarded z-scores on the basis of their reported results. The overall evaluation of the results shows a distinct variation between the participating laboratories. Based on a target standard deviation (σ-value) taken from the Horwitz equation, of the 14 laboratories that reported results, satisfactory results (z-score: |Z| ≤ 2.0) were obtained by 60% and 27% of the laboratories, respectively, for the two liquorice powders and by 93% and 53% of the laboratories, respectively, for the two liquorice pastes. Approximately equal numbers of laboratories used extraction types with and without the use of halogenated solvents. ANOVA testing of the results indicates there was no evident trend using different extraction solvents.

摘要

代表 CAOBISCO(欧盟巧克力、饼干和糖果工业协会)专家组,进行了一项欧洲能力验证系列测试,以评估各实验室在测量不同甘草制品样本中赭曲霉毒素 A 的能力。此外,还评估了萃取类型(主要是使用或不使用卤代溶剂)的影响。对四种不同的测试样本(两种甘草粉和两种甘草膏)进行了充分的均匀性测试,并分发给欧洲 8 个国家的 15 个实验室。结果使用标准能力验证统计程序进行分析,并根据报告的结果为实验室授予 z 分数。对结果的综合评估表明,参与实验室之间存在明显差异。基于来自 Horwitz 方程的目标标准偏差(σ 值),在报告结果的 14 个实验室中,分别有 60%和 27%的实验室对于两种甘草粉,以及 93%和 53%的实验室对于两种甘草膏,获得了满意的结果(z 分数:|Z|≤2.0)。使用有和没有使用卤代溶剂的萃取类型的实验室数量大致相同。对结果的 ANOVA 检验表明,使用不同的萃取溶剂并没有明显的趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验