Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Department of Sociology, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;86:52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
Rarely have donor conceived offspring been studied. Recently, it has become more common for parents to disclose the nature of conception to their offspring. This new development raises questions about the donor's place in the offspring's life and identity. Using surveys collected by the Donor Sibling Registry, the largest U.S. web-based registry, during a 15 week period from October 2009 to January 2010, we found that donor offspring view the donor as a whole person, rather than as simple genetic material (he can know you; he has looks; he can teach you about yourself); they also believe that the donor should act on his humanity (he should know about you and not remain an anonymous genetic contributor). Other new issues that emerge from this research include the findings that offspring may want to control the decision about contacting their sperm donor in order to facilitate a bond between themselves and the donor that is separate from their relationship with their parents. They also wish to assure their parents that their natal families are primary and will not be disrupted. We discuss how the age at which offspring learned about their donor conception and their current age each make a difference in their responses to what they want from contact with their donor. Family form (heterosexual two-parent families and lesbian two-parent families) also affects donor terminology. The role of the genetic father is reconsidered in both types of families. Donor conceived offspring raised in heterosexual families discover that their natal father no longer carries biological information and he is relegated to being "only" a social father. Offspring raised by lesbian couples experience a dissipation of the family narrative that they have no father. The donor, an imagined father, offers clues to the offspring's personal identity. The natal family is no longer the sole keeper of identity or ancestry.
鲜有对供体所生子女进行的研究。最近,越来越多的父母开始向子女披露受孕的本质。这种新的发展引发了关于供体在子女生活和身份中的地位的问题。利用 2009 年 10 月至 2010 年 1 月的 15 周时间,通过美国最大的网络注册机构——供体同胞登记处收集的调查,我们发现供体子女将供体视为一个完整的人,而不是简单的遗传物质(他可以了解你;他有外貌;他可以教你了解自己);他们还认为供体应该发挥他的人性(他应该了解你,而不是作为一个匿名的遗传贡献者)。这项研究还提出了其他一些新问题,包括发现子女可能希望控制与精子供体联系的决定,以便在自己和供体之间建立一种与他们与父母的关系分开的联系。他们还希望向父母保证,他们的原生家庭是主要的,不会被打乱。我们讨论了子女了解供体受孕的年龄以及他们目前的年龄如何影响他们对与供体联系的期望。家庭形式(异性恋双亲家庭和同性恋双亲家庭)也影响供体术语。遗传父亲的角色在这两种家庭中都需要重新考虑。在异性恋家庭中长大的供体子女发现,他们的亲生父亲不再携带生物信息,他被降级为“仅仅”是一个社会父亲。在由女同性恋伴侣抚养长大的子女中,家庭叙述会逐渐消失,即他们没有父亲。供体,一个想象中的父亲,为子女的个人身份提供了线索。原生家庭不再是身份或祖先的唯一守护者。