Suppr超能文献

比较显微镜检查、OptiMAL(®) 和 18S rRNA 基因多重 PCR 在检测来自印度比卡内尔现场分离株的疟原虫和疟原虫中的应用。

Comparative evaluation of microscopy, OptiMAL(®) and 18S rRNA gene based multiplex PCR for detection of Plasmodium falciparum & Plasmodium vivax from field isolates of Bikaner, India.

机构信息

Center for Biotechnology, Dept of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani-333031, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013 May 13;6(5):346-51. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60037-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate microscopy, OptiMAL(®) and multiplex PCR for the identification of Plasmodium falciparumm (P. falciparum) and Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) from the field isolates of Bikaner, Rajasthan (Northwest India).

METHODS

In this study, a multiplex PCR (P. falciparum and P. vivax) was further developed with the incorporation of Plasmodium malariae (P. malariae) specific primer and also a positive control. The performance of microscopy, plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) based malaria rapid diagnostic test OptiMAL(®) and 18S rRNA gene based multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of P. falciparum and P. vivax was compared.

RESULTS

The three species multiplex PCR (P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. malariae) with an inbuilt positive control was developed and evaluated. In comparison with multiplex PCR, which showed the sensitivity and specificity of 99.36% (95%CI, 98.11%-100.00%) and 100.00% (95%CI, 100.00%-100.00%), the sensitivity and specificity of microscopy was 90.44% (95%CI, 88.84%-95.04%) and 99.22% (95%CI, 97.71%-100.00%), and OptiMAL(®) was 93.58% (95%CI, 89.75%-97.42%) and 97.69% (95%CI, 95.10%-100.00%). The efficiencies were 99.65%, 95.10% and 95.45% for multiplex PCR, microscopy and OptiMAL(®), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results raise concerns over the overall sensitivities of microscopy and OptiMAL(®), when compared to the multiplex PCR and thus stress the need for new molecular interventions in the accurate detection of the malarial parasites. This further highlights the fact that further developments are needed to improve the performance of rapid diagnostic tests at field level.

摘要

目的

评估显微镜检查、OptiMAL(®)和多重 PCR 对印度拉贾斯坦邦比卡内尔(印度西北部)现场分离株中恶性疟原虫(P. falciparum)和间日疟原虫(P. vivax)的鉴定。

方法

本研究进一步开发了一种多重 PCR(P. falciparum 和 P. vivax),其中包含恶性疟原虫(P. malariae)特异性引物和一个阳性对照。比较了显微镜检查、基于疟原乳酸脱氢酶(pLDH)的 OptiMAL(®)快速诊断检测和基于 18S rRNA 基因的多重 PCR 对 P. falciparum 和 P. vivax 的诊断性能。

结果

开发并评估了一种包含内置阳性对照的三种疟原虫多重 PCR(P. falciparum、P. vivax 和 P. malariae)。与多重 PCR 相比,其灵敏度和特异性分别为 99.36%(95%CI,98.11%-100.00%)和 100.00%(95%CI,100.00%-100.00%),显微镜检查的灵敏度和特异性分别为 90.44%(95%CI,88.84%-95.04%)和 99.22%(95%CI,97.71%-100.00%),OptiMAL(®)的灵敏度和特异性分别为 93.58%(95%CI,89.75%-97.42%)和 97.69%(95%CI,95.10%-100.00%)。多重 PCR、显微镜检查和 OptiMAL(®)的效率分别为 99.65%、95.10%和 95.45%。

结论

与多重 PCR 相比,我们的结果对显微镜检查和 OptiMAL(®)的整体灵敏度提出了关注,因此强调需要新的分子干预措施来准确检测疟原虫。这进一步强调了需要进一步开发来提高现场快速诊断检测的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验