Suppr超能文献

塞内加尔疟疾低传播地区 CareStart™ 疟疾 HRP2/pLDH(Pf/pan)联合检测试剂的评估。

Evaluation of CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/pan) Combo Test in a malaria low transmission region of Senegal.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Avenue Cheikh Anta Diop, Fann, BP 5005, Dakar, Senegal.

出版信息

Malar J. 2017 Aug 10;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1980-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was initiated from the observation that prevalence of malaria obtained with rapid diagnostic test (RDT) (CareStart™Malaria HRP2/pLDH Combo Test) was higher than in microscopy in a malaria low transmission area of Senegal. PCR was then performed to evaluate the performance of the RDT compared to microscopy in clinical settings.

METHODS

The study included 215 patients suspected of malaria in two peri-urban area of Dakar. Finger-pick blood samples were tested using RDT (CareStart™Malaria HRP2/pLDH Combo Test). Venous blood samples were collected for light microscopy and PCR (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated as performance characteristics.

RESULTS

Considering PCR as the gold standard, CareStart™RDT showed high sensitivity (97.3%) and specificity (94.1%) with PPV and NPV of 97.3 and 94.1%, respectively, while microscopy had a sensitivity and specificity of 93.2 and 100%, respectively, and PPV and NPV of 100 and 87.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Malaria CareStart™RDT test demonstrated a superior sensitivity compared to microscopy, which is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis. CareStart™RDT could be a useful tool in individuals suspected of malaria even in areas where prevalence is low.

摘要

背景

本研究始于这样一种观察,即在塞内加尔疟疾低传播地区,快速诊断检测(RDT)(CareStart™疟疾 HRP2/pLDH 联合检测)获得的疟疾患病率高于显微镜检查。随后进行了 PCR 以评估 RDT 在临床环境中的表现与显微镜检查相比。

方法

该研究包括达喀尔两个城市周边地区的 215 名疑似疟疾患者。使用 RDT(CareStart™疟疾 HRP2/pLDH 联合检测)检测指尖采血样本。采集静脉血样进行光镜检查和 PCR(金标准)。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)作为性能特征。

结果

考虑到 PCR 为金标准,CareStart™RDT 显示出高敏感性(97.3%)和特异性(94.1%),PPV 和 NPV 分别为 97.3%和 94.1%,而显微镜检查的敏感性和特异性分别为 93.2%和 100%,PPV 和 NPV 分别为 100%和 87.2%。

结论

与作为金标准的显微镜检查相比,疟疾 CareStart™RDT 检测具有更高的敏感性。即使在患病率较低的地区,CareStart™RDT 也可以成为疑似疟疾患者的有用工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: challenges and prospects.疟疾快速诊断检测:挑战与展望。
J Med Microbiol. 2013 Oct;62(Pt 10):1491-1505. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.052506-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验