Langer A, Bobadilla J L
Centro de Investigaciones en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, México, D.F.
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1990 Mar;47(3):160-7.
In this paper, the authors present an analysis of the quantity and quality of Mexican literature on perinatal health, corresponding to the period 1980-January 1989. The articles here analyzed were published in journals of the Index Medicus. First, the authors established the Mexican contribution to the international bibliographic production. After that, the articles were classified according to the subject under discussion. The relevance of these themes, in relation to the Mexican epidemiologic situation, is discussed. In second place, a preliminary evaluation of the quality of some of the national articles was done. With this purpose, a scoring system (including conceptual and methodological criteria) was elaborated. The authors concluded that Mexican scientific production on perinatal health is still very scanty and they observed that it diminished during the present decade. One possible reason for that is the reduction of the budget devoted to research and the scarcity of researchers salaries. The analysis by themes showed that the scientific production is spread out and that the subjects most frequently treated do not always correspond to the most important epidemiologic problems in Mexico. The evaluation of quality is considered by the authors as preliminary. Anyway, this first approach shows that most of the papers are based on research projects with a transversal design, without an explicit theoretical framework and focused on hospital settings. The authors conclude that the evaluation of the quantity of the scientific production contributes to research development. Perinatal health; analysis of research.
在本文中,作者对1980年至1989年1月期间墨西哥围产期健康方面的文献数量和质量进行了分析。这里分析的文章发表在《医学索引》收录的期刊上。首先,作者确定了墨西哥对国际文献产出的贡献。之后,文章根据所讨论的主题进行了分类。讨论了这些主题与墨西哥流行病学情况的相关性。其次,对一些国内文章的质量进行了初步评估。为此,制定了一个评分系统(包括概念和方法标准)。作者得出结论,墨西哥围产期健康方面的科研产出仍然非常稀少,并且他们观察到在当前十年中有所减少。一个可能的原因是用于研究的预算减少以及研究人员薪水短缺。按主题分析表明,科研产出分布分散,最常涉及的主题并不总是与墨西哥最重要的流行病学问题相对应。作者认为质量评估只是初步的。无论如何,这一初步分析表明,大多数论文基于横向设计的研究项目,没有明确的理论框架,且集中在医院环境。作者得出结论,对科研产出数量的评估有助于研究的发展。围产期健康;研究分析。