Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Am J Med Genet A. 2013 May;161A(5):935-50. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35942.
Exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) offer potential advantages over traditional approaches to diagnostic genetic testing. Consequently, use of ES/WGS in clinical settings is rapidly becoming commonplace. Yet there are myriad moral, ethical, and perhaps legal implications attached to the use of ES and health care professionals and institutions will need to consider these implications in the context of the varied practices and policies of ES service providers. We developed "core elements" of content and procedures for informed consent, data sharing, and results management and a quantitative scale to assess the extent to which research protocols met the standards established by these core elements. We then used these tools to evaluate the practices and policies of each of the 6 U.S. CLIA-certified labs offering clinical ES. Approaches toward informed consent, data sharing, and results return vary widely among ES providers as do the overall potential merits and disadvantages of each, and more importantly, the balance between the two.
外显子组和全基因组测序(ES/WGS)相对于传统的诊断性基因检测方法具有潜在优势。因此,ES/WGS 在临床环境中的应用正在迅速普及。然而,ES 的使用涉及到众多道德、伦理甚至法律问题,医疗保健专业人员和机构需要在考虑 ES 服务提供商的各种实践和政策的情况下,考虑这些问题。我们制定了知情同意、数据共享和结果管理的“核心要素”以及一个量化的评估标准,以评估研究方案在多大程度上符合这些核心要素所确立的标准。然后,我们使用这些工具来评估 6 家提供临床 ES 的美国 CLIA 认证实验室的实践和政策。在知情同意、数据共享和结果返回方面,ES 提供者之间存在很大差异,每个提供者的整体潜在优缺点也存在很大差异,更重要的是,两者之间的平衡也存在很大差异。