Suppr超能文献

非裔美国人对外显子组和全基因组测序结果回报的态度。

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Genet A. 2013 May;161A(5):1064-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35914.

Abstract

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) present patients and research participants with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results of clinical and personal utility. Yet, this potential for benefit also risks disenfranchising populations such as African Americans (AAs) that are already underrepresented in genetic research and utilize genetic tests at lower rates than other populations. Understanding a diverse range of perspectives on consenting for ES/WGS and receiving ES/WGS results is necessary to ensure parity in genomic health care and research. We conducted a series of 13 focus groups (n = 76) to investigate if and how attitudes toward participation in ES/WGS research and return of results from ES/WGS differ between self-described AAs and non-AAs. The majority of both AAs and non-AAs were willing to participate in WGS studies and receive individual genetic results, but the fraction not interested in either was higher in AAs. This is due in part to different expectations of health benefits from ES/WGS and how results should be managed. Our results underscore the need to develop and test culturally tailored strategies for returning ES/WGS results to AAs.

摘要

外显子组测序和全基因组测序 (ES/WGS) 为患者和研究参与者提供了从广泛的临床和个人有用的遗传结果中受益的机会。然而,这种受益的潜力也有可能使非裔美国人(AA)等已经在遗传研究中代表性不足的人群失去权利,他们使用基因检测的比例低于其他人群。了解对 ES/WGS 同意和接收 ES/WGS 结果的不同观点对于确保基因组医疗保健和研究的平等性是必要的。我们进行了一系列 13 个焦点小组(n = 76)的研究,以调查自我描述的 AA 和非 AA 之间对参与 ES/WGS 研究和返回 ES/WGS 结果的态度是否以及如何不同。大多数 AA 和非 AA 都愿意参与 WGS 研究并接收个人遗传结果,但对两者都不感兴趣的比例在 AA 中更高。这部分是由于对 ES/WGS 的健康益处和结果应如何管理的不同期望。我们的研究结果强调了为 AA 返还 ES/WGS 结果制定和测试文化适应策略的必要性。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Am J Med Genet A. 2013 May;161A(5):1064-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35914.
2
Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Sep;164A(9):2153-60. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36610. Epub 2014 May 20.
3
Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul 3;95(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
4
Use of metaphors about exome and whole genome sequencing.
Am J Med Genet A. 2016 May;170A(5):1127-33. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37571. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Public attitudes in Japan toward participation in whole genome sequencing studies.
Hum Genomics. 2018 Apr 13;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0153-7.
6
When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):82-88. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1287786. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
7
"We don't know her history, her background": adoptive parents' perspectives on whole genome sequencing results.
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9738-z. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
8
Whole-Exome Profiling of NSCLC Among African Americans.
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Dec;15(12):1880-1892. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.
Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Dec;155A(12):2916-24. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34357. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
10
Variant detection sensitivity and biases in whole genome and exome sequencing.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jul 19;15(1):247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-247.

引用本文的文献

3
Evaluating parental personal utility of pediatric genetic and genomic testing in a diverse, multilingual population.
HGG Adv. 2024 Jul 18;5(3):100321. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100321. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
Spotlighting Structural Constraints on Decisions About Participation in Genomic and Precision Medicine.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):87-92. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2355893. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Returning personal genetic information on susceptibility to arsenic toxicity to research participants in Bangladesh.
Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 2):117482. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117482. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
6
The need for an intersectionality framework in precision medicine research.
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Oct 5;110(10):1609-1615. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.08.013.
8
Research Participants' Preferences for Individual Results of Pharmacogenomics Research: A Case of a Ugandan HIV Research Institute.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;18(4):218-232. doi: 10.1177/15562646231187434. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
9
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Feb;24(2):69-90. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2180109. Epub 2023 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Mar;21(3):248-55. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.130. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
2
The Centers for Mendelian Genomics: a new large-scale initiative to identify the genes underlying rare Mendelian conditions.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 Jul;158A(7):1523-5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35470. Epub 2012 May 24.
3
Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes.
Science. 2012 Jul 6;337(6090):64-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1219240. Epub 2012 May 17.
4
Return of results: not that complicated?
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):358-60. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.8.
5
Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
8
Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):405-10. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.21. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):399-404. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.68. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验