Halverson Colin Me, Ross Lainie Friedman
Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
We conducted a deliberative engagement to assess attitudinal changes regarding biobank research, governance, and the return of results. We recruited African-Americans from two Southside Chicago health care facilities that serve communities of very different socioeconomic and educational backgrounds in order to examine similarities and differences within the African-American population. We used a mixed method, deliberative engagement process involving a convenience sample of parents recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) [n = 23] and a university-based practice (UBP) [n = 22]. Four coding categories illustrate similarities and differences between participants from the two different practices: (1) reasons for and against participation; (2) trust and mistrust; (3) return of research results; and (4) religion. Overall, there was strong interest in receiving results, which was a main motivator for participation. While participants from both health care facilities expressed distrust of research, UBP participants also expressed trust in the research enterprise. FQHC participants more frequently mentioned religion. Studies about participation in biobanks often focus on participants' race as the sole significant variable, while our work supports the importance of other demographic factors. Medical researchers must move beyond research analyses that consider the African-American population to be monolithic and value the diversity within it.
我们开展了一次审议性参与活动,以评估在生物样本库研究、管理及结果反馈方面的态度变化。我们从芝加哥南区的两家医疗保健机构招募非裔美国人,这两家机构服务于社会经济和教育背景差异很大的社区,目的是研究非裔美国人总体内部的异同。我们采用了一种混合方法,即审议性参与过程,涉及从一家联邦合格健康诊所(FQHC)[n = 23]和一家大学附属医院(UBP)[n = 22]招募的家长便利样本。四个编码类别说明了来自两种不同医疗机构的参与者之间的异同:(1)参与的理由和反对的理由;(2)信任和不信任;(3)研究结果的反馈;(4)宗教。总体而言,参与者对获得结果有着浓厚兴趣,这是参与的主要动机。虽然两家医疗机构的参与者都表达了对研究的不信任,但大学附属医院的参与者也表达了对研究事业的信任。联邦合格健康诊所的参与者更频繁地提及宗教。关于参与生物样本库的研究通常将参与者的种族作为唯一重要变量,而我们的工作支持了其他人口统计学因素的重要性。医学研究人员必须超越那种将非裔美国人视为单一群体的研究分析,重视其内部的多样性。