• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让非裔美国人参与生物样本库及研究结果反馈的相关事宜。

Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

作者信息

Halverson Colin Me, Ross Lainie Friedman

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3
PMID:22454259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3461227/
Abstract

We conducted a deliberative engagement to assess attitudinal changes regarding biobank research, governance, and the return of results. We recruited African-Americans from two Southside Chicago health care facilities that serve communities of very different socioeconomic and educational backgrounds in order to examine similarities and differences within the African-American population. We used a mixed method, deliberative engagement process involving a convenience sample of parents recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) [n = 23] and a university-based practice (UBP) [n = 22]. Four coding categories illustrate similarities and differences between participants from the two different practices: (1) reasons for and against participation; (2) trust and mistrust; (3) return of research results; and (4) religion. Overall, there was strong interest in receiving results, which was a main motivator for participation. While participants from both health care facilities expressed distrust of research, UBP participants also expressed trust in the research enterprise. FQHC participants more frequently mentioned religion. Studies about participation in biobanks often focus on participants' race as the sole significant variable, while our work supports the importance of other demographic factors. Medical researchers must move beyond research analyses that consider the African-American population to be monolithic and value the diversity within it.

摘要

我们开展了一次审议性参与活动,以评估在生物样本库研究、管理及结果反馈方面的态度变化。我们从芝加哥南区的两家医疗保健机构招募非裔美国人,这两家机构服务于社会经济和教育背景差异很大的社区,目的是研究非裔美国人总体内部的异同。我们采用了一种混合方法,即审议性参与过程,涉及从一家联邦合格健康诊所(FQHC)[n = 23]和一家大学附属医院(UBP)[n = 22]招募的家长便利样本。四个编码类别说明了来自两种不同医疗机构的参与者之间的异同:(1)参与的理由和反对的理由;(2)信任和不信任;(3)研究结果的反馈;(4)宗教。总体而言,参与者对获得结果有着浓厚兴趣,这是参与的主要动机。虽然两家医疗机构的参与者都表达了对研究的不信任,但大学附属医院的参与者也表达了对研究事业的信任。联邦合格健康诊所的参与者更频繁地提及宗教。关于参与生物样本库的研究通常将参与者的种族作为唯一重要变量,而我们的工作支持了其他人口统计学因素的重要性。医学研究人员必须超越那种将非裔美国人视为单一群体的研究分析,重视其内部的多样性。

相似文献

1
Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.让非裔美国人参与生物样本库及研究结果反馈的相关事宜。
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.生物银行参与和研究结果返还:来自芝加哥南侧参与式审议的观点。
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
3
Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children.非裔美国父母对生物银行参与和自身及子女研究结果返还的态度。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):561-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100600. Epub 2012 May 9.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.社区领袖对让非裔美国人参与生物样本库及其他人类遗传学倡议的看法。
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):483-94. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0155-z. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
6
Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.基于生物库的研究中治疗误解的偶发发现。
Genet Med. 2012 Jun;14(6):611-5. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.50. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
7
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
8
Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.种族和民族多样化的生物样本库参与者参与的原因及基因信息需求:一项焦点小组研究
J Community Genet. 2011 Sep;2(3):153-63. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0052-2. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Prioritizing Approaches to Engage Community Members and Build Trust in Biobanks: A Survey of Attitudes and Opinions of Adults within Outpatient Practices at the University of Maryland.确定吸引社区成员并建立对生物样本库信任的方法的优先级:对马里兰大学门诊机构内成年人态度和意见的调查
J Pers Med. 2015 Jul 28;5(3):264-79. doi: 10.3390/jpm5030264.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.了解基因筛查:利用健康信息预防疾病风险。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;22(4):903-919. doi: 10.7150/ijms.101219. eCollection 2025.
2
Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Recruitment of Black People With Cancer in Biospecimen-Based Research.基于生物样本研究招募癌症黑人患者的障碍和促进因素的范围综述。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 May;8:e2300708. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00708.
3
When Biobanks Meet Religion: Association Between Religiosity and Attitudes of Polish Medical Students Toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes.当生物银行遇见宗教:波兰医学生对人类生物材料用于研究目的的生物银行的态度与宗教信仰之间的关联。
J Relig Health. 2024 Apr;63(2):1178-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01932-2. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Recruiting African American Prostate Cancer Survivors for a Population-based Biobank Study.招募非裔美国前列腺癌幸存者参与基于人群的生物库研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jun 1;32(6):768-775. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1157.
5
Recruitment strategies and lessons learned from a large genetic study of African Americans.非裔美国人大型基因研究的招募策略及经验教训
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000416. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
The Role of Transportation in the Enrollment of Elderly African Americans into Exercise and Memory Study: GEMS Study.交通在招募老年非裔美国人参与锻炼和记忆研究中的作用:GEMS 研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01367-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants.利益相关者对将无行动性载脂蛋白 L1(APOL1)遗传结果返还给非裔美国研究参与者的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):4-14. doi: 10.1177/15562646211063267. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.基因组研究中个体研究结果的返还:利益相关者观点的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021.
9
Use of a Qualitative Story Deck to Create Scenarios and Uncover Factors Associated with African American Participation in Genomics Research.使用定性故事卡片来创建情景并揭示与非裔美国人参与基因组学研究相关的因素。
Field methods. 2021 May 1;33(2):159-174. doi: 10.1177/1525822x20982089. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.马来西亚生物样本库研究的现状与未来挑战
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Mar 31;13(3):297-315. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00171-5. eCollection 2021 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.生物银行参与和研究结果返还:来自芝加哥南侧参与式审议的观点。
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
2
Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.种族和民族多样化的生物样本库参与者参与的原因及基因信息需求:一项焦点小组研究
J Community Genet. 2011 Sep;2(3):153-63. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0052-2. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
3
Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies.组织捐赠至生物库:社会学研究综述。
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Jul;33(5):792-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01342.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
4
Willingness to participate in clinical trials among African Americans and whites previously exposed to clinical research.非裔美国人和曾参与过临床研究的白人参与临床试验的意愿。
J Cult Divers. 2011 Spring;18(1):8-19.
5
Consent for future genetic research: the NHANES experience in 2007-2008.未来基因研究的同意书:2007 - 2008年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的经验
IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):9-14.
6
Patient perspectives on group benefits and harms in genetic research.患者对基因研究中群体益处和危害的看法。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(3):135-42. doi: 10.1159/000317497. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
7
Evaluation of conceptual framework for recruitment of African American patients with breast cancer.招募非裔美国乳腺癌患者的概念框架评估
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 May;37(3):E160-7. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.E160-E167.
8
The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research.种族和信任在遗传研究中的组织/血液捐赠中的作用。
Genet Med. 2010 Feb;12(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181cd6689.
9
Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.公众对生物样本库研究中隐私重要性的看法。
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;85(5):643-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
10
Utilization of religious coping strategies among African American women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险增加的非裔美国女性对宗教应对策略的运用
Fam Community Health. 2009 Jul-Sep;32(3):218-27. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181ab3b53.