Suppr超能文献

让非裔美国人参与生物样本库及研究结果反馈的相关事宜。

Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

作者信息

Halverson Colin Me, Ross Lainie Friedman

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Abstract

We conducted a deliberative engagement to assess attitudinal changes regarding biobank research, governance, and the return of results. We recruited African-Americans from two Southside Chicago health care facilities that serve communities of very different socioeconomic and educational backgrounds in order to examine similarities and differences within the African-American population. We used a mixed method, deliberative engagement process involving a convenience sample of parents recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) [n = 23] and a university-based practice (UBP) [n = 22]. Four coding categories illustrate similarities and differences between participants from the two different practices: (1) reasons for and against participation; (2) trust and mistrust; (3) return of research results; and (4) religion. Overall, there was strong interest in receiving results, which was a main motivator for participation. While participants from both health care facilities expressed distrust of research, UBP participants also expressed trust in the research enterprise. FQHC participants more frequently mentioned religion. Studies about participation in biobanks often focus on participants' race as the sole significant variable, while our work supports the importance of other demographic factors. Medical researchers must move beyond research analyses that consider the African-American population to be monolithic and value the diversity within it.

摘要

我们开展了一次审议性参与活动,以评估在生物样本库研究、管理及结果反馈方面的态度变化。我们从芝加哥南区的两家医疗保健机构招募非裔美国人,这两家机构服务于社会经济和教育背景差异很大的社区,目的是研究非裔美国人总体内部的异同。我们采用了一种混合方法,即审议性参与过程,涉及从一家联邦合格健康诊所(FQHC)[n = 23]和一家大学附属医院(UBP)[n = 22]招募的家长便利样本。四个编码类别说明了来自两种不同医疗机构的参与者之间的异同:(1)参与的理由和反对的理由;(2)信任和不信任;(3)研究结果的反馈;(4)宗教。总体而言,参与者对获得结果有着浓厚兴趣,这是参与的主要动机。虽然两家医疗机构的参与者都表达了对研究的不信任,但大学附属医院的参与者也表达了对研究事业的信任。联邦合格健康诊所的参与者更频繁地提及宗教。关于参与生物样本库的研究通常将参与者的种族作为唯一重要变量,而我们的工作支持了其他人口统计学因素的重要性。医学研究人员必须超越那种将非裔美国人视为单一群体的研究分析,重视其内部的多样性。

相似文献

1
Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
3
Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):561-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100600. Epub 2012 May 9.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):483-94. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0155-z. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
6
Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.
Genet Med. 2012 Jun;14(6):611-5. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.50. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;22(4):903-919. doi: 10.7150/ijms.101219. eCollection 2025.
4
Recruiting African American Prostate Cancer Survivors for a Population-based Biobank Study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jun 1;32(6):768-775. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1157.
5
Recruitment strategies and lessons learned from a large genetic study of African Americans.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000416. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
The Role of Transportation in the Enrollment of Elderly African Americans into Exercise and Memory Study: GEMS Study.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01367-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):4-14. doi: 10.1177/15562646211063267. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021.
10
Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Mar 31;13(3):297-315. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00171-5. eCollection 2021 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
3
Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies.
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Jul;33(5):792-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01342.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
6
Patient perspectives on group benefits and harms in genetic research.
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(3):135-42. doi: 10.1159/000317497. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
7
Evaluation of conceptual framework for recruitment of African American patients with breast cancer.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 May;37(3):E160-7. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.E160-E167.
8
The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research.
Genet Med. 2010 Feb;12(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181cd6689.
9
Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;85(5):643-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Oct 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验