• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期两年的 400 例患者的临床结果研究,比较了开放手术和关节镜下修复肩袖撕裂的效果。

A two-year clinical outcomes study of 400 patients, comparing open surgery and arthroscopy for rotator cuff repair.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Research Institute (ORI), University of New South Wales, St George Hospital Campus, Sydney, New South Wales 2217, Australia.

出版信息

Bone Joint Res. 2012 Sep 1;1(9):210-7. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.19.2000072. Print 2012 Sep.

DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.19.2000072
PMID:23610693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3626212/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any significant difference in temporal measurements of pain, function and rates of re-tear for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) patients compared with those patients undergoing open RCR.

METHODS

This study compared questionnaire- and clinical examination-based outcomes over two years or longer for two series of patients who met the inclusion criteria: 200 open RCR and 200 arthroscopic RCR patients. All surgery was performed by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

Most pain measurements were similar for both groups. However, the arthroscopic RCR group reported less night pain severity at six months, less extreme pain and greater satisfaction with their overall shoulder condition than the open RCR group. The arthroscopic RCR patients also had earlier recovery of strength and range of motion, achieving near maximal recovery by six months post-operatively whereas the open RCR patients took longer to reach the same recovery level. The median operative times were 40 minutes (20 to 90) for arthroscopic RCR and 60 minutes (35 to 120) for open RCR. Arthroscopic RCR had a 29% re-tear rate compared with 52% for the open RCR group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic RCR involved less extreme pain than open RCR, earlier functional recovery, a shorter operative time and better repair integrity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与行开放式肩袖修复术(ORCR)的患者相比,行关节镜下肩袖修复术(ARCR)的患者在疼痛、功能的时间测量以及再撕裂率方面是否存在显著差异。

方法

本研究对符合纳入标准的两批患者(200 例接受开放式肩袖修复术和 200 例接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者)进行了长达两年或更长时间的问卷调查和临床检查。所有手术均由同一位外科医生完成。

结果

两组患者的大多数疼痛测量结果相似。然而,ARCR 组在术后 6 个月时报告夜间疼痛严重程度较轻、极端疼痛较少、对整体肩部状况的满意度更高。ARCR 患者的力量和活动范围恢复更早,术后 6 个月即可接近完全恢复,而 ORCR 患者则需要更长时间才能达到相同的恢复水平。关节镜下肩袖修复术的中位手术时间为 40 分钟(20 至 90 分钟),而开放式肩袖修复术的中位手术时间为 60 分钟(35 至 120 分钟)。ARCR 的再撕裂率为 29%,而 ORCR 组为 52%(p<0.001)。

结论

与 ORCR 相比,ARCR 涉及的极端疼痛较少,功能恢复更早,手术时间更短,修复完整性更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/a98048a8fc71/2000072-galleyfig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/8a50e0913aa6/2000072-galleyfig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/8133c875a831/2000072-galleyfig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/2cc55448dfad/2000072-galleyfig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/c88c6134f905/2000072-galleyfig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/0c8f7d70e67f/2000072-galleyfig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/575691335d05/2000072-galleyfig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/45a4ef0337ba/2000072-galleyfig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/23041acb728a/2000072-galleyfig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/4349926a0cd6/2000072-galleyfig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/a98048a8fc71/2000072-galleyfig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/8a50e0913aa6/2000072-galleyfig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/8133c875a831/2000072-galleyfig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/2cc55448dfad/2000072-galleyfig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/c88c6134f905/2000072-galleyfig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/0c8f7d70e67f/2000072-galleyfig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/575691335d05/2000072-galleyfig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/45a4ef0337ba/2000072-galleyfig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/23041acb728a/2000072-galleyfig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/4349926a0cd6/2000072-galleyfig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9c/3626212/a98048a8fc71/2000072-galleyfig10.jpg

相似文献

1
A two-year clinical outcomes study of 400 patients, comparing open surgery and arthroscopy for rotator cuff repair.一项为期两年的 400 例患者的临床结果研究,比较了开放手术和关节镜下修复肩袖撕裂的效果。
Bone Joint Res. 2012 Sep 1;1(9):210-7. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.19.2000072. Print 2012 Sep.
2
Effect of Acromioplasty on Postoperative Pain Following Rotator Cuff Repair.肩峰成形术对肩袖修复术后疼痛的影响。
HSS J. 2021 Jul;17(2):150-157. doi: 10.1177/1556331621993123. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense? A Systematic Review.老年人肩袖撕裂的修复:是否合理?系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):744-753. doi: 10.1177/0363546519834574. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Arthroscopic, open and mini-open approach for rotator cuff repair: no difference in pain or function at 24 months.关节镜、开放及迷你开放入路修复肩袖:24个月时疼痛或功能无差异。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Jan;88(1-2):50-55. doi: 10.1111/ans.14176. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients.翻修术与初次关节镜下肩袖修补术:360例患者2年的疗效分析
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):557-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560729. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
6
Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair: Which Has a Better Complication and 30-Day Readmission Profile?关节镜下与开放型肩袖修复术:哪种并发症更少,30 天再入院率更低?
Arthroscopy. 2017 Oct;33(10):1764-1769. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Predictors of outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair in 155 cases: a propensity score weighted analysis of knotted and knotless self-reinforcing repair techniques at a minimum of 2 years.155例关节镜下经骨等效性肩袖修补术后的预后预测因素:对打结和无结自增强修补技术进行至少2年的倾向评分加权分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Oct;137(10):1399-1408. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2750-7. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Long-term Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Follow-up Study Comparing Single-Row Versus Double-Row Fixation Techniques.关节镜肩袖修复的长期结果:单排与双排固定技术的随访比较研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1568-1574. doi: 10.1177/0363546520919120. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Lower Two-Year Reoperation Rates Compared With Open Rotator Cuff Repair in a Large Cross-sectional Cohort.在一个大型横断面队列研究中,与开放式肩袖修复术相比,关节镜下肩袖修复术的两年再次手术率更低。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov 24;3(6):e2015-e2023. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.008. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
What Influence Does Progression of a Nonhealing Rotator Cuff Tear Have on Shoulder Pain and Function?不愈合的肩袖撕裂进展对肩部疼痛和功能有何影响?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1596-1604. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5251-7. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair: Open vs. Arthroscopic Approaches in Patients with Diabetes or Hyperlipidemia.肩袖修复的结果:糖尿病或高脂血症患者的开放手术与关节镜手术方法对比
J Orthop Sports Med. 2025;7(2):240-249. doi: 10.26502/josm.511500201. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Rotator Cuff Repair by All-Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Technique: A Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcome.全关节镜与小切口开放技术修复肩袖:临床与功能结果比较
Cureus. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):e71546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71546. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Present situation and development prospects of the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears.

本文引用的文献

1
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.关节镜下带或不带肩峰成形术的全层肩袖撕裂修复术治疗:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):1953-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00488.
2
Complete rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Operative treatment with report of two successful cases. 1911.冈上肌腱完全断裂。手术治疗并报告两例成功病例。1911年。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):347-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.031. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
3
Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic.
肩袖撕裂的诊断与治疗现状及发展前景
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 27;10:857821. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.857821. eCollection 2023.
4
A Rare Case of Rotator Cuff Interposition Causing Humeral Head Subluxation Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation.一例罕见的肩袖嵌顿导致肩关节前脱位后肱骨头半脱位病例
Cureus. 2022 Jul 22;14(7):e27145. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27145. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Increased Risk of Surgical-Site Infection and Need for Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Those Who Undergo Open Versus Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.与接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者相比,接受开放性肩袖修复术的患者手术部位感染风险增加且需要在麻醉下进行手法操作。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 5;4(2):e527-e533. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.012. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Racial disparities in outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A propensity score matched analysis using multiple national data sets.关节镜下肩袖修复术疗效的种族差异:一项使用多个国家数据集的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Orthop. 2022 Feb 28;30:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.022. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
7
Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Injury with Modified Buyang Huanwu Decoction and Rotator Cuff Repair.改良补阳还五汤联合肩袖修复术治疗肩袖损伤的临床观察。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Oct 25;2021:3088160. doi: 10.1155/2021/3088160. eCollection 2021.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches.肩袖修复中自收紧缝线技术的生物力学评估:单环和双环结缝线。
Open Med (Wars). 2021 Feb 12;16(1):293-298. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0211. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparing clinical outcomes between rotator cuff repairs, SLAP repairs, and combined repairs.比较肩袖修复、SLAP修复和联合修复之间的临床结果。
JSES Int. 2020 Aug 21;4(4):875-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.014. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
No difference in long-term outcome between open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized study.开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复术的长期疗效无差异:一项前瞻性随机研究。
JSES Int. 2020 Sep 18;4(4):818-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.005. eCollection 2020 Dec.
在低、中、高容量中心比较肩袖修复技术的总费用和手术室时间:微创与全关节镜。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul;19(5):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.011. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
4
Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.开放式与两种形式的关节镜下肩袖修复术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):966-78. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0706-0. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
5
Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study.关节镜下与开放修复肩袖后的袖带完整性:一项前瞻性研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):290-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.017.
6
Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcome.关节镜下与小切口开放性肩袖修复术:临床结果比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.008.
7
A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair.关节镜下与开放性肩袖修复术的比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Sep;21(9):1090-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.010.
8
Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative view of 96 cases.开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复术:96例病例的对比观察
Arthroscopy. 2005 May;21(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.002.
9
Transitioning to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the pros and cons.向关节镜下肩袖修复术的转变:利弊分析
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:81-92.
10
Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.使用可生物吸收螺钉进行肩袖修复:一项体内和体外研究。
Arthroscopy. 2003 Mar;19(3):239-48. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50013.