• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用在线患者报告结局工具对胃食管反流病患者进行开放获取招募

Open access capture of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using an online patient-reported outcomes instrument.

作者信息

Tielemans Merel M, Jansen Jan Bmj, van Oijen Martijn Gh

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2012 Sep 26;1(2):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2101.

DOI:10.2196/ijmr.2101
PMID:23611985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3626138/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently search online for information about causes and treatment options. The GerdQ self-assessment questionnaire can be used for diagnosis of GERD and follow-up of symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether it is feasible (1) to study the prevalence and impact of GERD in persons visiting a GERD information website, and (2) to identify partial responsiveness to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy using the GerdQ.

METHODS

All visitors (aged 18-79 years) to a GERD information website between November 2008 and May 2011 were invited to complete the GerdQ online. The GerdQ questionnaire consists of 6 questions (score per question: 0-3). In respondents who did not use PPIs, we used the questionnaire to identify those with GERD (total score ≥8) and assess the influence of these symptoms on their daily life, divided into low (total score <3 on impact questions) and high impact (total score ≥3 on impact questions). In PPI users, we used the GerdQ to quantify partial responsiveness by any report of heartburn, regurgitation, sleep disturbance, or over-the-counter medication use for more than 1 day in the preceding week. We subsequently asked GerdQ respondents scoring ≥8 to complete the disease-specific Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 131,286 visitors completed the GerdQ, of whom 80.23% (n = 105,329) did not use a PPI. Of these, we identified 67,379 respondents (63.97%) to have GERD (n = 32,935; 48.88% high impact). We invited 14,028 non-PPI users to complete the QOLRAD questionnaire, of whom 1231 (8.78%) completed the questionnaire. Mean total QOLRAD scores were 5.14 (SEM 0.04) for those with high-impact GERD and 5.77 (SEM 0.04) for those with low-impact GERD (P < .001). In PPI users, 22,826 of 25,957 respondents (87.94%) reported partial responsiveness. We invited 6238 PPI users to complete the QOLRAD questionnaire, of whom 599 (9.60%) completed the disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Mean total QOLRAD scores were 4.62 (SEM 0.05) for partial responders and 5.88 (SEM 0.14) for adequate responders (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The GerdQ identified GERD in many website respondents and measured partial responsiveness in the majority of PPI users. Both non-PPI users with GERD and PPI users with partial responsiveness were associated with a decreased health-related quality of life. We have shown the feasibility of GERD patient identification online.

摘要

背景

胃食管反流病(GERD)患者经常在网上搜索有关病因和治疗方案的信息。GerdQ自我评估问卷可用于GERD的诊断和症状随访。

目的

评估(1)研究访问GERD信息网站的人群中GERD的患病率及其影响,以及(2)使用GerdQ识别质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的部分反应性是否可行。

方法

邀请2008年11月至2011年5月期间访问GERD信息网站的所有访客(年龄在18 - 79岁之间)在线完成GerdQ。GerdQ问卷由6个问题组成(每个问题得分:0 - 3分)。在未使用PPI的受访者中,我们使用该问卷识别出患有GERD的患者(总分≥8分),并评估这些症状对其日常生活的影响,分为低影响(影响问题总分<3分)和高影响(影响问题总分≥3分)。在使用PPI的患者中,我们使用GerdQ通过在前一周内任何关于烧心、反流、睡眠障碍或使用非处方药物超过1天的报告来量化部分反应性。随后,我们要求GerdQ得分≥8分的受访者完成特定疾病的反流和消化不良生活质量(QOLRAD)问卷。

结果

共有131,286名访客完成了GerdQ,其中80.23%(n = 105,329)未使用PPI。在这些未使用PPI的受访者中,我们确定67,379名受访者(63.97%)患有GERD(n = 32,935;48.88%为高影响)。我们邀请14,028名未使用PPI的用户完成QOLRAD问卷,其中1231名(8.78%)完成了问卷。高影响GERD患者的QOLRAD总平均分是5.14(标准误0.04),低影响GERD患者的QOLRAD总平均分是5.77(标准误0.04)(P <.001)。在使用PPI的患者中,25,957名受访者中有22,826名(87.94%)报告有部分反应性。我们邀请6238名使用PPI的用户完成QOLRAD问卷,其中599名(9.60%)完成了特定疾病的生活质量问卷。部分反应者的QOLRAD总平均分是4.62(标准误0.05),充分反应者的QOLRAD总平均分是5.88(标准误0.14)(P <.001)。

结论

GerdQ在许多网站受访者中识别出了GERD,并在大多数使用PPI的患者中测量了部分反应性。患有GERD的未使用PPI患者和有部分反应性的使用PPI患者均与健康相关生活质量下降有关。我们已经证明了在线识别GERD患者的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/4f089b73f83a/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/582ae39e3ef0/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/9a6239740ad0/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/c6304e065c36/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/4f089b73f83a/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/582ae39e3ef0/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/9a6239740ad0/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/c6304e065c36/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/3626138/4f089b73f83a/ijmr_v1i5e7_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Open access capture of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using an online patient-reported outcomes instrument.使用在线患者报告结局工具对胃食管反流病患者进行开放获取招募
Interact J Med Res. 2012 Sep 26;1(2):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2101.
2
Online follow-up of individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease using a patient-reported outcomes instrument: results of an observational study.采用患者报告结局工具对胃食管反流病患者进行在线随访:一项观察性研究的结果。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 1;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-144.
3
Clinical Validity and Reliability of the Malay Language Translations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire in a Primary Care Setting.在基层医疗环境中,胃食管反流病问卷和反流与消化不良问卷生活质量的马来语翻译版本的临床有效性和可靠性。
Dig Dis. 2019;37(2):100-107. doi: 10.1159/000494386. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Symptoms, the GerdQ score and patients' characteristics do not predict gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with proton-pump-inhibitor-refractory reflux symptoms-results from a large prospective database.质子泵抑制剂治疗无效的反流症状患者的症状、GerdQ 评分和患者特征不能预测胃食管反流病-来自大型前瞻性数据库的结果。
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 21;11:e14802. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14802. eCollection 2023.
5
Value of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ) in predicting the proton pump inhibitor response in coronary artery disease patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chest pain.胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)在预测患有胃食管反流相关性胸痛的冠心病患者对质子泵抑制剂反应中的价值
Dis Esophagus. 2016 May;29(4):367-76. doi: 10.1111/dote.12329. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
A prospective study to compare a symptom-based reflux disease questionnaire to 48-h wireless pH monitoring for the identification of gastroesophageal reflux (revised 2-26-11).一项前瞻性研究比较基于症状的反流病问卷与 48 小时无线 pH 监测在胃食管反流病诊断中的作用(修订于 2011 年 2 月 26 日)。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;106(9):1604-11. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.180. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
7
Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and effects of esomeprazole on the quality of life related to reflux and dyspepsia in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.维持性血液透析患者胃食管反流病症状的患病率及埃索美拉唑对反流和消化不良相关生活质量的影响。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016 Feb;20(1):134-42. doi: 10.1007/s10157-015-1130-2. Epub 2015 May 31.
8
The GerdQ questionnaire and high resolution manometry support the hypothesis that proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia is a GERD-related phenomenon.GerdQ问卷和高分辨率测压法支持这样一种假说,即质子泵抑制剂反应性食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多是一种与胃食管反流病相关的现象。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;44(5):522-30. doi: 10.1111/apt.13718. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
9
[Insufficient symptom control under long-term treatment with PPI in GERD - fact or fiction?].[GERD长期使用质子泵抑制剂治疗下症状控制不足——事实还是虚构?]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2016 May 25;158 Suppl 4:7-11. doi: 10.1007/s15006-016-8303-0.
10
Psychometric validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者生活质量反流和消化不良问卷(QOLRAD)荷兰文译本的心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Aug 17;8:85. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Single Arm Study on the Effect of Ilaprazole in Patients with Heartburn but No Reflux Esophagitis.伊拉普利对烧心但无反流性食管炎患者疗效的前瞻性单臂研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Oct;59(8):951-959. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.951.
2
Online follow-up of individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease using a patient-reported outcomes instrument: results of an observational study.采用患者报告结局工具对胃食管反流病患者进行在线随访:一项观察性研究的结果。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 1;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-144.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomised clinical trial: a comparison between a GerdQ-based algorithm and an endoscopy-based approach for the diagnosis and initial treatment of GERD.随机临床试验:基于 GerdQ 算法与内镜法在 GERD 诊断和初步治疗中的比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;35(11):1290-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05092.x. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
2
Impact of length or relevance of questionnaires on attrition in online trials: randomized controlled trial.问卷长度或相关性对在线试验中受试者流失率的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 18;13(4):e96. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1733.
3
Systematic review: the association between symptomatic response to proton pump inhibitors and health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
系统评价:质子泵抑制剂对胃食管反流病患者症状缓解与健康相关生活质量的相关性。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Sep;34(6):618-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04774.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
4
Internet skills performance tests: are people ready for eHealth?互联网技能性能测试:人们是否为电子健康做好准备?
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 29;13(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581.
5
The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study.在线健康信息搜索者的特征与动机:横断面调查与定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 23;13(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1600.
6
The gain in quality-adjusted life months by switching to esomeprazole in those with continued reflux symptoms in primary care: EncomPASS--a cluster-randomized trial.在初级保健中,对于那些持续存在反流症状的患者,转换为埃索美拉唑可获得质量调整生命月数的增加:EncomPASS——一项集群随机试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2341-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.368. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
7
Psychometric validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者生活质量反流和消化不良问卷(QOLRAD)荷兰文译本的心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Aug 17;8:85. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-85.
8
Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies.系统评价:初级保健和社区研究中质子泵抑制剂治疗后持续性反流症状。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Sep;32(6):720-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04406.x.
9
Depressive symptoms and unmet psychological needs of Dutch youth with type 1 diabetes: results of a web-survey.荷兰 1 型糖尿病青少年的抑郁症状和未满足的心理需求:一项网络调查的结果。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 May;12(3 Pt 1):172-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00673.x.
10
The gap between clinical trials and clinical practice: the use of pragmatic clinical trials to inform regulatory decision making.临床试验与临床实践之间的差距:运用实用临床试验为监管决策提供信息。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;87(3):351-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.218. Epub 2009 Dec 9.