• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时佩戴两台动态血压监测仪的比较。

A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time.

机构信息

Renal, Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May;15(5):321-5. doi: 10.1111/jch.12098. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1111/jch.12098
PMID:23614845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8033815/
Abstract

There are limited data in the literature comparing two simultaneously worn ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) devices. The authors compared BPs from two monitors (Mobil-O-Graph [I.E.M., Stolberg, Germany] and Spacelabs 90207 [Spacelabs Medical, Issequah, WA]). In the nonrandomized component of the study, simultaneous 8-hour BP and heart rate data were measured by Mobil-O-Graph, consistently applied to the nondominant arm, and Spacelabs to the dominant arm on 12 untreated adults. Simultaneous 8-hour BP and heart data were obtained by the same monitors randomly assigned to a dominant or nondominant arm on 12 other untreated adults. Oscillometric BP profiles were obtained in the dominant and nondominant arms of the above 24 patients using an Accutorr (Datascope, Mahwah, NJ) device. The Spacelabs monitor recorded a 10.2-mm Hg higher systolic pressure in the nonrandomized (P=.0016) and a 7.9-mm Hg higher systolic pressure in the randomized studies (P=.00008) compared with the Mobil-O-Graph. The mean arterial pressures were 1 mm Hg to 2 mm Hg different between monitors in the two studies, and heart rates were nearly identical. Our observations, if confirmed in larger cohorts, support the concern that ABPM device manufacturers consider developing normative databases for their devices.

摘要

文献中比较同时佩戴的两种动态血压监测(ABPM)设备的数据有限。作者比较了两种监测器(Mobil-O-Graph[I.E.M.,德国斯托尔贝格]和 Spacelabs 90207[Spacelabs Medical,华盛顿州伊瑟夸])的血压。在研究的非随机部分,同时测量了 8 小时的 Mobil-O-Graph 血压和心率数据,一致应用于非优势手臂,Spacelabs 则应用于 12 名未经治疗的成年人的优势手臂。另外 12 名未经治疗的成年人的优势或非优势手臂随机分配了相同的监测器,同时测量了 8 小时的血压和心率数据。在上述 24 名患者的优势和非优势手臂上使用 Accutorr(Datascope,新泽西州 Mahwah)设备获得了振荡血压谱。Spacelabs 监测器在非随机研究中记录的收缩压比 Mobil-O-Graph 高 10.2mmHg(P=.0016),在随机研究中高 7.9mmHg(P=.00008)。在两项研究中,两种监测器的平均动脉压相差 1 至 2mmHg,心率几乎相同。如果在更大的队列中得到证实,我们的观察结果支持 ABPM 设备制造商考虑为其设备开发规范数据库的担忧。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time.同时佩戴两台动态血压监测仪的比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May;15(5):321-5. doi: 10.1111/jch.12098. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
2
Blood pressure variability of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors.两种动态血压监测仪的血压变异性
Blood Press Monit. 2014 Apr;19(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000019.
3
A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions.在静态和动态条件下,使用太空实验室90217A和Mobil-O-Graph NG设备记录肱动脉血压的比较研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Dec;30(12):742-749. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2016.11. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Comparison of 3 Devices for 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in a Nonclinical Environment Through a Randomized Trial.在非临床环境中通过随机试验比较 3 种设备用于 24 小时动态血压监测。
Am J Hypertens. 2020 Nov 3;33(11):1021-1029. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa117.
5
Comparison of two blood pressure oscillometric devices: Datascope Accutorr Plus and Mobil-O-Graph PWA and conversion of blood pressure values from one device to the other.两种示波法血压测量设备的比较:Datascope Accutorr Plus和Mobil-O-Graph PWA以及血压值在两种设备之间的转换
Blood Press Monit. 2020 Feb;25(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000409.
6
The first study comparing a wearable watch-type blood pressure monitor with a conventional ambulatory blood pressure monitor on in-office and out-of-office settings.第一项研究比较了可穿戴手表式血压监测仪与传统动态血压监测仪在诊室和诊室外环境中的应用。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Feb;22(2):135-141. doi: 10.1111/jch.13799. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
7
Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.单袖带电子设备在各种手臂尺寸下都能准确测量吗?用于家庭血压监测的Visomat Comfort 20/40设备的验证。
J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Nov;22(11):796-800. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
8
Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria.使用欧洲高血压学会(ESH)标准对新一代Mobil-O-Graph动态血压监测设备进行评估。
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):229-31. doi: 10.1097/mbp.0b013e328339be38.
9
Ambulatory aortic blood pressure, wave reflections and pulse wave velocity are elevated during the third in comparison to the second interdialytic day of the long interval in chronic haemodialysis patients.在慢性血液透析患者的长透析间期,与第二次透析间期相比,第三次透析间期的动态主动脉血压、波反射和脉搏波速度升高。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Dec;30(12):2046-53. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv090. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
BpTRUth: do automated blood pressure monitors outperform mercury?BpTRUth:自动血压监测仪是否优于水银血压计?
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013 Nov-Dec;7(6):448-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 3 Devices for 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in a Nonclinical Environment Through a Randomized Trial.在非临床环境中通过随机试验比较 3 种设备用于 24 小时动态血压监测。
Am J Hypertens. 2020 Nov 3;33(11):1021-1029. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa117.
2
A study of the VaSera arterial stiffness device in US patients.一项针对美国患者的VaSera动脉硬度检测设备的研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Jul;19(7):661-668. doi: 10.1111/jch.12967. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Assessing the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in patients with nondialytic chronic kidney disease.评估欧姆龙HEM-907XL示波法血压测量装置在非透析慢性肾病患者中的准确性。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Mar;19(3):296-302. doi: 10.1111/jch.12961. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Integrating Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension.将诊室外血压纳入高血压的诊断与管理
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Nov;18(11):112. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0780-3.
5
A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions.在静态和动态条件下,使用太空实验室90217A和Mobil-O-Graph NG设备记录肱动脉血压的比较研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Dec;30(12):742-749. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2016.11. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
What is the truth? Differences in ambulatory blood pressure data between monitors.真相是什么?不同血压监测仪之间动态血压数据的差异。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May;15(5):326-7. doi: 10.1111/jch.12097. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing blood pressure responses to noncardiovascular drugs: the beneficial role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.评估非心血管药物的血压反应:动态血压监测的有益作用。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Jan;15(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/jch.12023. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
2
Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement.血压测量的原则和技术。
Cardiol Clin. 2010 Nov;28(4):571-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2010.07.006.
3
Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device.mobil-O-Graph的验证:24小时血压测量设备。
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):225-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328338892f.
4
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: Executive Summary. A joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.关于家庭血压监测使用与报销的行动呼吁:执行摘要。美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会联合发表的科学声明。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jun;10(6):467-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.08418.x.
5
Prognostic superiority of daytime ambulatory over conventional blood pressure in four populations: a meta-analysis of 7,030 individuals.四项人群研究中动态血压监测较传统血压测量的预后优势:对7030例个体的荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2007 Aug;25(8):1554-64. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281c49da5.
6
Diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on 10-year cardiovascular risk.基于10年心血管风险的动态血压监测诊断阈值。
Circulation. 2007 Apr 24;115(16):2145-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.662254. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
7
Prevalence and clinical implications of the inter-arm blood pressure difference: A systematic review.双臂血压差异的患病率及临床意义:一项系统评价。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Dec;20(12):923-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002093. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
8
Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study.动态血压测量在预测死亡率方面优于诊室血压测量:都柏林结局研究
Hypertension. 2005 Jul;46(1):156-61. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000170138.56903.7a. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
9
Interarm differences in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure: the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study.坐位收缩压和舒张压的双臂差异:高血压遗传流行病学网络研究
J Hypertens. 2005 Jun;23(6):1141-7. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000170376.23461.f7.
10
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.人类和实验动物血压测量的建议:第1部分:人类血压测量:美国心脏协会高血压研究委员会专业与公众教育小组委员会为专业人员发布的声明
Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):697-716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6.