Division of Cardiovascular and Rare Diseases, Center for Biomedical Science, National Institute of Health, Cheongwon-gun, Chungbuk, Korea.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May;15(5):344-9. doi: 10.1111/jch.12080. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
The objectives of this study were to construct a risk score for predicting incident hypertension by using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) data and to compare the performance between KoGES and the Framingham model. A total of 4747 participants were analyzed. The entire cohort was randomly assigned to derivation and validation sets at a ratio of 6:4. A hypertension risk score was developed based on the derivation cohort, using the same risk factors that were used for developing the Framingham hypertension risk score. The accuracy of KoGES and Framingham models was evaluated in terms of calibration and discrimination. The area under receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves were 0.789 for the Framingham model and 0.791 for the KoGES model. The AROC calculated for the point-based risk score was 0.790, which is almost identical to that for the KoGES model. The Framingham model showed poor agreement (χ(2) =29.73, P=.0002) and underestimated the risk of hypertension in most deciles of predicted risk. The model based on KoGES yielded results similar to the observed risk of hypertension (χ(2) =4.17, P=.8415). This study demonstrates that the Framingham risk score based on data from a non-Korean population can lead to the underestimation of the prediction risk of hypertension.
本研究旨在利用韩国基因组与流行病学研究(KoGES)数据构建预测高血压事件的风险评分,并比较 KoGES 与弗雷明汉模型的性能。共分析了 4747 名参与者。整个队列按 6:4 的比例随机分配到推导和验证集。使用与弗雷明汉高血压风险评分相同的风险因素,基于推导队列开发高血压风险评分。校准和判别评估 KoGES 和弗雷明汉模型的准确性。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为弗雷明汉模型 0.789,KoGES 模型 0.791。基于点的风险评分的 AUC 为 0.790,与 KoGES 模型几乎相同。弗雷明汉模型显示出较差的一致性(χ²=29.73,P=.0002),并且在预测风险的大多数十分位数中低估了高血压的风险。基于 KoGES 的模型得出的结果与高血压的实际风险相似(χ²=4.17,P=.8415)。本研究表明,基于非韩国人群数据的弗雷明汉风险评分可能导致高血压预测风险的低估。