• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证加拿大人群高血压风险预测模型及构建风险评分

Development and validation of a hypertension risk prediction model and construction of a risk score in a Canadian population.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine, G012F, Health Sciences Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16904-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-16904-x
PMID:35896590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9329335/
Abstract

Identifying high-risk individuals for targeted intervention may prevent or delay hypertension onset. We developed a hypertension risk prediction model and subsequent risk sore among the Canadian population using measures readily available in a primary care setting. A Canadian cohort of 18,322 participants aged 35-69 years without hypertension at baseline was followed for hypertension incidence, and 625 new hypertension cases were reported. At a 2:1 ratio, the sample was randomly divided into derivation and validation sets. In the derivation sample, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to develop the model, and the model's performance was evaluated in the validation sample. Finally, a risk score table was created incorporating regression coefficients from the model. The multivariable Cox model identified age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, total physical activity time, and cardiovascular disease as significant risk factors (p < 0.05) of hypertension incidence. The variable sex was forced to enter the final model. Some interaction terms were identified as significant but were excluded due to their lack of incremental predictive capacity. Our model showed good discrimination (Harrel's C-statistic 0.77) and calibration (Grønnesby and Borgan test, [Formula: see text] statistic = 8.75, p = 0.07; calibration slope 1.006). A point-based score for the risks of developing hypertension was presented after 2-, 3-, 5-, and 6 years of observation. This simple, practical prediction score can reliably identify Canadian adults at high risk of developing incident hypertension in the primary care setting and facilitate discussions on modifying this risk most effectively.

摘要

识别高危个体进行针对性干预可能预防或延迟高血压的发生。我们使用初级保健环境中易于获得的措施,为加拿大人群开发了高血压风险预测模型和随后的风险评分。在一项无高血压基线的 18322 名 35-69 岁加拿大队列中,对高血压发病进行了随访,报告了 625 例新发高血压病例。按照 2:1 的比例,将样本随机分为推导和验证集。在推导样本中,使用 Cox 比例风险模型开发模型,并在验证样本中评估模型性能。最后,创建了一个风险评分表,其中包含模型的回归系数。多变量 Cox 模型确定年龄、体重指数、收缩压、糖尿病、总体力活动时间和心血管疾病是高血压发病的显著危险因素(p<0.05)。变量性别被强制纳入最终模型。一些交互项被确定为显著,但由于缺乏增量预测能力而被排除。我们的模型显示出良好的区分度(Harrell 的 C 统计量为 0.77)和校准度(Grønnesby 和 Borgan 检验,[公式:见文本]统计量=8.75,p=0.07;校准斜率 1.006)。提出了一种基于点的高血压发病风险评分,观察 2、3、5 和 6 年后。这个简单实用的预测评分可以可靠地识别出加拿大成年人在初级保健环境中发生高血压的高危人群,并有助于讨论如何最有效地改变这种风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/87c9de37ce38/41598_2022_16904_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/28eacd6611bd/41598_2022_16904_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/69e76c617d07/41598_2022_16904_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/a79f678a927c/41598_2022_16904_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/e0ee721ffb37/41598_2022_16904_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/14e81e888b75/41598_2022_16904_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/87c9de37ce38/41598_2022_16904_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/28eacd6611bd/41598_2022_16904_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/69e76c617d07/41598_2022_16904_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/a79f678a927c/41598_2022_16904_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/e0ee721ffb37/41598_2022_16904_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/14e81e888b75/41598_2022_16904_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85d/9329335/87c9de37ce38/41598_2022_16904_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a hypertension risk prediction model and construction of a risk score in a Canadian population.开发和验证加拿大人群高血压风险预测模型及构建风险评分
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16904-x.
2
Developing and validating a new precise risk-prediction model for new-onset hypertension: The Jichi Genki hypertension prediction model (JG model).开发和验证一种新的精准预测新发高血压风险的模型:日本吉见高血压预测模型(JG 模型)。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 May;20(5):880-890. doi: 10.1111/jch.13270. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
3
Development of a risk prediction model for incident hypertension in a working-age Japanese male population.开发一个针对日本年轻男性高血压发病风险的预测模型。
Hypertens Res. 2015 Jun;38(6):419-25. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.159. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
A risk score for predicting near-term incidence of hypertension: the Framingham Heart Study.预测高血压近期发病率的风险评分:弗雷明汉心脏研究
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):102-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00005.
5
Development of a point-based prediction model for the incidence of total stroke: Japan public health center study.基于点数的全脑卒中发病预测模型的构建:日本公共卫生中心研究。
Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1295-302. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.677534. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
6
Development of a risk prediction model for incident hypertension in Japanese individuals: the Hisayama Study.日本人群中高血压事件风险预测模型的建立:Hisayama 研究。
Hypertens Res. 2021 Sep;44(9):1221-1229. doi: 10.1038/s41440-021-00673-7. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
Prediction of 10-year Risk of Incident Heart Failure in Elderly Hypertensive Population: The ANBP2 Study.老年高血压人群发生心力衰竭10年风险的预测:ANBP2研究
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Jan;30(1):88-94. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw119. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Derivation and validation of QStroke score for predicting risk of ischaemic stroke in primary care and comparison with other risk scores: a prospective open cohort study.基于初级保健的 QStroke 评分预测缺血性卒中风险的推导和验证,并与其他风险评分比较:一项前瞻性开放队列研究。
BMJ. 2013 May 2;346:f2573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2573.
9
Prediction model and assessment of probability of incident hypertension: the Rural Chinese Cohort Study.预测模型与中国农村队列研究中高血压发病概率评估。
J Hum Hypertens. 2021 Jan;35(1):74-84. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-0314-8. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Prediction Models for the 5- and 10-Year Incidence of Home Morning Hypertension: The Ohasama Study.家庭清晨高血压 5 年和 10 年发生率的预测模型:大盐研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2022 Apr 2;35(4):328-336. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab177.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and validating a nomogram prediction model for osteoporosis risk in the UK biobank: a national prospective cohort.在英国生物银行中开发并验证用于骨质疏松症风险的列线图预测模型:一项全国性前瞻性队列研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22485-x.
2
Further insights into influence factors of hypertension in older patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a model based on multiple centers.老年阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者高血压影响因素的多中心模型研究
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 27;37(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02986-w.
3
Optimizing hypertension prediction using ensemble learning approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用传统回归和机器学习模型预测高血压:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266334. eCollection 2022.
2
External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?预后模型的外部验证:是什么、为什么、如何、何时以及何地?
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Worsening Hypertension Awareness, Treatment, and Control Rates in Canadian Women Between 2007 and 2017.
使用集成学习方法优化高血压预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0315865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315865. eCollection 2024.
4
Prognostic risk models for incident hypertension: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.预测高血压事件的预后风险模型:PRISMA 系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0294148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294148. eCollection 2024.
5
Development of risk models of incident hypertension using machine learning on the HUNT study data.利用 HUNT 研究数据的机器学习开发偶发性高血压风险模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56170-7.
6
Predicting the risk of hypertension using machine learning algorithms: A cross sectional study in Ethiopia.使用机器学习算法预测高血压风险:在埃塞俄比亚的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289613. eCollection 2023.
7
A comparison of machine learning algorithms and traditional regression-based statistical modeling for predicting hypertension incidence in a Canadian population.比较机器学习算法和基于传统回归的统计建模在预测加拿大人群高血压发病率中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27264-x.
2007 年至 2017 年期间加拿大女性高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率恶化。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 May;36(5):732-739. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.02.092. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Summarising and synthesising regression coefficients through systematic review and meta-analysis for improving hypertension prediction using metamodelling: protocol.通过系统综述和荟萃分析总结和综合回归系数,以改进使用变形模型进行高血压预测:方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 9;10(4):e036388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036388.
5
Precision health through prediction modelling: factors to consider before implementing a prediction model in clinical practice.精准健康的预测模型:在将预测模型应用于临床实践之前需要考虑的因素。
J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;12(1):3-9. doi: 10.1071/HC19087.
6
Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling.变量选择策略及其在临床预测模型中的重要性。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Feb 16;8(1):e000262. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000262. eCollection 2020.
7
Prediction model and assessment of probability of incident hypertension: the Rural Chinese Cohort Study.预测模型与中国农村队列研究中高血压发病概率评估。
J Hum Hypertens. 2021 Jan;35(1):74-84. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-0314-8. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Validation of clinical prediction models: what does the "calibration slope" really measure?临床预测模型的验证:“校准斜率”到底在衡量什么?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.016. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Predicting the risk of stroke among patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of C-statistics.预测 2 型糖尿病患者中风风险:C 统计量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e025579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025579.
10
A risk score predicting new incidence of hypertension in Japan.预测日本高血压新发病例的风险评分。
J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Oct;33(10):748-755. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0226-7. Epub 2019 Aug 20.