• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
BRCA1/2 sequence variants of uncertain significance: a primer for providers to assist in discussions and in medical management.BRCA1/2 意义未明的序列变异:为提供者提供的指南,以协助讨论和医疗管理。
Oncologist. 2013;18(5):518-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0452. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
2
Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants.乳腺癌患者中意义未明的BRCA1和BRCA2变异的比较分析:一种基于多因素概率的模型与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)解释序列变异的标准和指南
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1250-1257. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.39. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Reclassification of and variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.多中心前瞻性队列的多因素分析:和意义不明变异体的重新分类。
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
5
BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测——处理临床意义不确定变异的陷阱与建议
Ann Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2057-65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv278. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
6
Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families.葡萄牙乳腺癌/卵巢癌家系中鉴定的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 未分类变异体的致病性评估。
J Mol Diagn. 2014 May;16(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
7
A Study on the Retrospective Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的回顾性再阐释研究。
Clin Lab. 2024 Apr 1;70(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230911.
8
A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).基于多因素概率的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 意义未明变异体(VUS)分类模型的回顾。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):8-21. doi: 10.1002/humu.21627. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
9
Changes in classification of genetic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.BRCA1和BRCA2基因变异分类的变化。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):279-280. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4631-2. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Functional Categorization of Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance in Homologous Recombination Repair Complementation Assays.同源重组修复互补检测中不确定临床意义变异体的功能分类。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4559-4568. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0255. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Mutational spectrum of BRCA genes in Egyptian patients with breast cancer.埃及乳腺癌患者中BRCA基因的突变谱
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26067. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09810-5.
2
Mutation Spectrum Analysis of BRCA1/2 Genes for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the Indian Population.印度人群遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌BRCA1/2基因的突变谱分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):4145-4151. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4145.
3
Phenotypic evaluation of deep learning models for classifying germline variant pathogenicity.用于分类种系变异致病性的深度学习模型的表型评估。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Oct 19;8(1):235. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00710-x.
4
Prediction of and Variants with Conflicting Clinical Interpretation in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.在乳腺癌患者队列中预测具有临床解释冲突的 和 变异体。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 18;15(7):943. doi: 10.3390/genes15070943.
5
Real-world evaluation of deep learning algorithms to classify functional pathogenic germline variants.用于对功能性致病种系变体进行分类的深度学习算法的真实世界评估。
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 7:2024.04.05.24305402. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.05.24305402.
6
Unveiling pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes across head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients via next generation sequencing.通过下一代测序揭示头颈鳞状细胞癌患者BRCA1和BRCA2基因中的致病突变。
Am J Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):6099-6112. eCollection 2023.
7
GENETIC DUTIES.遗传职责。
William Mary Law Rev. 2020 Oct;62(1):143-211.
8
Clinical risk management of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostatic cancers for BRCA1/2 variant carriers in Japan.日本 BRCA1/2 变异携带者的乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌和前列腺癌的临床风险管理。
J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug;68(8):517-526. doi: 10.1038/s10038-023-01153-1. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
9
Challenges in next generation sequencing of homology recombination repair genomic variants in prostate cancer: A nationwide survey and calibration project in China.前列腺癌同源重组修复基因组变异的下一代测序挑战:中国一项全国性调查与校准项目
Prostate Int. 2022 Dec;10(4):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
How does re-classification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) impact the management of patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer?意义未明的变异(VUS)的重新分类如何影响遗传性乳腺癌风险患者的管理?
BMC Med Genomics. 2022 May 31;15(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01270-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity.基于同源定向修复活性的 BRCA2 DNA 结合域错义变异分类模型。
Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 1;73(1):265-75. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2081. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
2
BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk.BRCA1 R1699Q 变异体表现出功能不确定的失活,可导致中等程度的乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险。
J Med Genet. 2012 Aug;49(8):525-32. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101037.
3
Classification of missense substitutions in the BRCA genes: a database dedicated to Ex-UVs.BRCA 基因突变分类:一个专门针对 Ex-UVs 的数据库。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):22-8. doi: 10.1002/humu.21629. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
4
ENIGMA--evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.ENIGMA--基于证据的种系突变等位基因解释网络:一项旨在评估 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因序列变异相关风险和临床意义的国际倡议。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):2-7. doi: 10.1002/humu.21628. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
5
A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).基于多因素概率的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 意义未明变异体(VUS)分类模型的回顾。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):8-21. doi: 10.1002/humu.21627. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
6
Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing variants: a collaborative report by ENIGMA consortium members.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 剪接变异体的特征:ENIGMA 联盟成员的协作报告。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(3):1009-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1674-0. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
7
A comprehensive functional characterization of BRCA2 variants associated with Fanconi anemia using mouse ES cell-based assay.利用基于小鼠胚胎干细胞的检测方法,对与范可尼贫血症相关的 BRCA2 变异进行全面的功能特征分析。
Blood. 2011 Sep 1;118(9):2430-42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324541. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
8
Prediction of missense mutation functionality depends on both the algorithm and sequence alignment employed.错义突变功能的预测取决于所使用的算法和序列比对。
Hum Mutat. 2011 Jun;32(6):661-8. doi: 10.1002/humu.21490. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
Splicing and multifactorial analysis of intronic BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants identifies clinically significant splicing aberrations up to 12 nucleotides from the intron/exon boundary.剪接和多因素分析内含子 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 序列变异体,鉴定了距内含子/外显子边界达 12 个核苷酸的临床上显著的剪接异常。
Hum Mutat. 2011 Jun;32(6):678-87. doi: 10.1002/humu.21495. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
10
Cancer risk management decisions of women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.携带意义未明的BRCA1或BRCA2基因变异女性的癌症风险管理决策。
Breast J. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):210-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01055.x. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

BRCA1/2 意义未明的序列变异:为提供者提供的指南,以协助讨论和医疗管理。

BRCA1/2 sequence variants of uncertain significance: a primer for providers to assist in discussions and in medical management.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2013;18(5):518-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0452. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0452
PMID:23615697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3662842/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

DNA variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are common outcomes of clinical genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer. A statistically rigorous model that provides a pathogenicity score for each variant has been developed to aid in the clinical management of patients undergoing genetic testing.

METHODS

The information in this article is derived from multiple publications on VUS in BRCA genes, distilled for communicating with clinicians who may encounter VUS in their practice.

RESULTS

The posterior probability scores for BRCA1 or BRCA2 VUS, calculated from a multifactorial likelihood model, are explained, and links for looking up specific VUS are provided. The International Agency on Cancer Research (IARC) of the World Health Organization has proposed a simple five-tier system for clinical management that is not widely known to clinicians. Classes 1 and 2 in this system are managed as neutral variants, classes 4 and 5 are managed as pathogenic variants, and class 3 variants still have insufficient evidence to move to either end of this scale and, thus, cannot be used in medical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of models that integrate multiple independent lines of evidence has allowed classification of a growing number of VUS in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The pathogenicity score that is generated by this model maps to the IARC system for clinical management, which will assist clinicians in the medical management of those patients who obtain a VUS result upon testing.

摘要

简介

在癌症易感性的临床基因检测中,常见到意义未明的 DNA 变异(VUS)。为了帮助接受基因检测的患者进行临床管理,已经开发出一种具有统计学严谨性的模型,可为每个变异体提供致病性评分。

方法

本文的信息源自 BRCA 基因中 VUS 的多个出版物,经过提炼,以便与可能在实践中遇到 VUS 的临床医生进行交流。

结果

从多因素似然模型计算出的 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 VUS 的后验概率评分得到了解释,并提供了查找特定 VUS 的链接。世界卫生组织国际癌症研究机构(IARC)提出了一个简单的五层次临床管理系统,这在临床医生中并不广为人知。该系统中的类别 1 和 2 被视为中性变异,类别 4 和 5 被视为致病性变异,类别 3 变异仍缺乏足够的证据来移至该尺度的任一端,因此不能用于医疗管理。

结论

整合多种独立证据的模型的发展,使得越来越多的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因中的 VUS 得到分类。该模型生成的致病性评分与 IARC 临床管理系统相对应,这将有助于临床医生对那些在检测中获得 VUS 结果的患者进行医疗管理。