• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多因素概率的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 意义未明变异体(VUS)分类模型的回顾。

A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).

机构信息

Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):8-21. doi: 10.1002/humu.21627. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1002/humu.21627
PMID:21990134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3242438/
Abstract

Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not pathogenic (no increased risk of cancer). However, a significant proportion of genetic tests yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have undefined risk of cancer. Individuals carrying these VUS cannot benefit from individualized cancer risk assessment. Recently, a quantitative "posterior probability model" for assessing the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1 or BRCA2, which integrates multiple forms of genetic evidence has been developed. Here, we provide a detailed review of this model. We describe the components of the model and explain how these can be combined to calculate a posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. We explain how the model can be applied to public data and provide tables that list the VUS that have been classified as not pathogenic or pathogenic using this method. While we use BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS as examples, the method can be used as a framework for classification of the pathogenicity of VUS in other cancer genes.

摘要

临床突变筛查 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因中的胚系失活突变,用于识别乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险增加的个体。筛选过程中发现的变异通常分为致病性(增加癌症风险)或非致病性(无增加癌症风险)。然而,很大一部分基因检测会产生意义不明的变异(VUS),这些变异的癌症风险尚未确定。携带这些 VUS 的个体无法从个体化癌症风险评估中受益。最近,一种用于评估 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 中 VUS 的临床相关性的定量“后验概率模型”已经开发出来,该模型整合了多种形式的遗传证据。在这里,我们对该模型进行了详细的回顾。我们描述了模型的组成部分,并解释了如何将这些部分组合起来计算每个 VUS 的致病性后验概率。我们解释了如何将该模型应用于公共数据,并提供了使用该方法分类为非致病性或致病性的 VUS 列表。虽然我们使用 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 的 VUS 作为示例,但该方法可作为其他癌症基因中 VUS 致病性分类的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6646/3242438/d48e65f829dc/nihms329708f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6646/3242438/d48e65f829dc/nihms329708f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6646/3242438/d48e65f829dc/nihms329708f1.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).基于多因素概率的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 意义未明变异体(VUS)分类模型的回顾。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):8-21. doi: 10.1002/humu.21627. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
2
Reclassification of and variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.多中心前瞻性队列的多因素分析:和意义不明变异体的重新分类。
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
3
and Testing through Next Generation Sequencing in a Small Cohort of Italian Breast/Ovarian Cancer Patients: Novel Pathogenic and Unknown Clinical Significance Variants.对一小部分意大利乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者进行下一代测序检测:新的致病性和未知临床意义的变异体。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 12;20(14):3442. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143442.
4
Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.用于表征意义未明的BRCA1和BRCA2变异体的临床适用模型。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5393-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.8228. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
5
Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families.葡萄牙乳腺癌/卵巢癌家系中鉴定的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 未分类变异体的致病性评估。
J Mol Diagn. 2014 May;16(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
6
BRCA1/2 sequence variants of uncertain significance: a primer for providers to assist in discussions and in medical management.BRCA1/2 意义未明的序列变异:为提供者提供的指南,以协助讨论和医疗管理。
Oncologist. 2013;18(5):518-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0452. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
7
ENIGMA--evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.ENIGMA--基于证据的种系突变等位基因解释网络:一项旨在评估 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因序列变异相关风险和临床意义的国际倡议。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):2-7. doi: 10.1002/humu.21628. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
8
Rapid screening test of most frequent BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants in the NGS era.在 NGS 时代对最常见的 BRCA1/BRCA2 致病性变异进行快速筛查测试。
Neoplasma. 2018;65(2):309-315. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_170507N328.
9
BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测——处理临床意义不确定变异的陷阱与建议
Ann Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2057-65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv278. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants.乳腺癌患者中意义未明的BRCA1和BRCA2变异的比较分析:一种基于多因素概率的模型与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)解释序列变异的标准和指南
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1250-1257. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.39. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision screening facilitates clinical classification of BRCA2-PALB2 binding variants with benign and pathogenic functional effects.精准筛查有助于对具有良性和致病性功能效应的BRCA2-PALB2结合变体进行临床分类。
J Clin Invest. 2025 Apr 15;135(12). doi: 10.1172/JCI181879. eCollection 2025 Jun 16.
2
Joint analysis of germline genetic data from over 29,000 cases with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) as part of the NASGE initiative.作为NASGE计划的一部分,对超过29000例疑似遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)病例的种系遗传数据进行联合分析。
Breast. 2025 Apr;80:103887. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.103887. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A computational method to classify variants of uncertain significance using functional assay data with application to BRCA1.一种使用功能测定数据对意义未明的变异进行分类的计算方法及其在 BRCA1 中的应用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jun;20(6):1078-88. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1214. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
2
Comprehensive analysis of missense variations in the BRCT domain of BRCA1 by structural and functional assays.通过结构和功能测定对 BRCA1 的 BRCT 结构域中的错义变异进行综合分析。
Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 15;70(12):4880-90. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4563. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
3
LOH analysis should not be used as a tool to assess whether UVs of BRCA1/2 are pathogenic or not.
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing in unselected patients: example of private supplementation of public healthcare service.
在未选择的患者中进行遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因检测:公共医疗服务的私人补充实例。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00426-8.
4
Rare Germline Variants in DNA Repair Genes Detected in -Negative Finnish Patients with Early-Onset Breast Cancer.在芬兰早发性乳腺癌阴性患者中检测到的DNA修复基因中的罕见种系变异
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 24;16(17):2955. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172955.
5
Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel.基于证据的基因特异性 ACMG/AMP 变异分类推荐意见,来自 ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异 curation 专家小组。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 5;111(9):2044-2058. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
6
Co-observation of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes: Results from analysis of the BRIDGES sequencing dataset.乳腺癌易感基因胚系致病性变异的共同观察:BRIDGES 测序数据集分析的结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 5;111(9):2059-2069. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
7
Functional Characterization of the Human BRCA1 ∆11 Splicing Isoforms in Yeast.在酵母中对人类 BRCA1 ∆11 剪接异构体的功能进行鉴定。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 9;25(14):7511. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147511.
8
Functional analysis and clinical classification of 462 germline BRCA2 missense variants affecting the DNA binding domain.功能分析和临床分类 462 个种系 BRCA2 错义变体,这些变体影响 DNA 结合域。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar 7;111(3):584-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Classification of MLH1 Missense VUS Using Protein Structure-Based Deep Learning-Ramachandran Plot-Molecular Dynamics Simulations Method.基于蛋白质结构的深度学习-构象分布图-分子动力学模拟方法对 MLH1 错义 VUS 的分类。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 10;25(2):850. doi: 10.3390/ijms25020850.
10
Male with an apparently normal phenotype carrying a BRCA1 exon 20 duplication in trans to a BRCA1 frameshift variant.一名表型似乎正常的男性,携带 BRCA1 外显子 20 重复与 BRCA1 移码变异的反式遗传。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 9;26(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01755-9.
杂合性缺失分析不应被用作评估BRCA1/2的变异是否致病的工具。
Fam Cancer. 2010 Sep;9(3):289-90. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9318-9.
4
Expression of human BRCA1 variants in mouse ES cells allows functional analysis of BRCA1 mutations.人 BRCA1 变异体在小鼠 ES 细胞中的表达可实现对 BRCA1 突变的功能分析。
J Clin Invest. 2009 Oct;119(10):3160-71. doi: 10.1172/JCI39836. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
5
A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example.一种用于共分离分析以评估未分类变异致病性的简单方法;以BRCA1和BRCA2为例。
BMC Cancer. 2009 Jun 29;9:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-211.
6
Characterization of BRCA1 ring finger variants of uncertain significance.BRCA1 指环指变异体的特征分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;119(3):737-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0438-6. Epub 2009 Jun 20.
7
A method to assess the clinical significance of unclassified variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes based on cancer family history.一种基于癌症家族史评估BRCA1和BRCA2基因中未分类变异临床意义的方法。
Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(1):R8. doi: 10.1186/bcr2223. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
8
Classification of rare missense substitutions, using risk surfaces, with genetic- and molecular-epidemiology applications.利用风险曲面进行罕见错义替换的分类及其在遗传和分子流行病学中的应用。
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1342-54. doi: 10.1002/humu.20896.
9
Tumor characteristics as an analytic tool for classifying genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance.肿瘤特征作为一种分析工具,用于对临床意义不确定的基因变异进行分类。
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1292-303. doi: 10.1002/humu.20894.
10
Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.序列变异分类与报告:改善癌症易感性基因检测结果解读的建议
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1282-91. doi: 10.1002/humu.20880.