• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MELD 评分实施对肝脏分配的影响:巴西中心的经验。

Impact of MELD score implementation on liver allocation: experience at a Brazilian center.

机构信息

Post Graduate Program in Medicine-Hepatology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Hepatol. 2013 May-Jun;12(3):440-7.

PMID:23619261
Abstract

Introduction. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is an accurate predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis, and has been used on liver allocation in Brazil since 2006. However, its impact on organ allocation, waiting list and post-transplant mortality is still poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementation of the MELD system on liver allocation and mortality after liver transplantation (LT) in Southern Brazil. Material and methods. Adult patients with chronic liver disease on the waiting list for primary deceased-donor LT were divided into two cohorts (pre- and post-MELD implementation) according to the date of waiting list placement. Disease severity, as assessed by MELD score at placement, was similar in both cohorts. Patients were followed for at least 18 months to assess the outcomes of interest (death/LT). Results. Higher MELD scores correlated with waiting list mortality, which increased 20% with each additional point (HR 1.2; 95%CI 1.14-2.26; p < 0.001). Waiting list mortality was 30.9% before and 21.7% after MELD implementation (nonsignificant). Transplant rate increased after MELD implementation (52 vs. 40%, p = 0.002). After excluding patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, mean MELD scores at LT were significantly higher in the MELD era (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between MELD scores at LT and post-LT survival. During 18-month follow-up, post-LT mortality rate was 25.4% before and 20% after MELD implementation (nonsignificant). Conclusion. MELD implementation was associated with a reduction in waiting list mortality. Although sicker patients received LT in the MELD era, post-transplant survival was similar in both periods.

摘要

简介。终末期肝病模型(MELD)是预测肝硬化患者死亡率的准确指标,自 2006 年以来,该模型已用于巴西的肝脏分配。然而,其对器官分配、等待名单和移植后死亡率的影响仍未得到充分描述。本研究旨在评估 MELD 系统的实施对巴西南部肝脏分配和肝移植(LT)后死亡率的影响。

材料和方法。根据等待名单放置日期,将慢性肝病成年患者分为两个队列(MELD 实施前和实施后)。两组患者的疾病严重程度(MELD 评分)相似。至少随访 18 个月以评估感兴趣的结局(死亡/LT)。

结果。MELD 评分越高,等待名单死亡率越高,每增加 1 分死亡率增加 20%(HR 1.2;95%CI 1.14-2.26;p < 0.001)。MELD 实施前等待名单死亡率为 30.9%,实施后为 21.7%(无显著性差异)。MELD 实施后移植率增加(52%对 40%,p = 0.002)。排除肝细胞癌患者后,MELD 时代 LT 时的平均 MELD 评分显著升高(p < 0.01)。LT 时的 MELD 评分与 LT 后生存率无显著相关性。在 18 个月的随访期间,MELD 实施前的 LT 后死亡率为 25.4%,实施后为 20%(无显著性差异)。

结论。MELD 的实施与降低等待名单死亡率相关。尽管 MELD 时代接受 LT 的患者病情更严重,但两个时期的移植后生存率相似。

相似文献

1
Impact of MELD score implementation on liver allocation: experience at a Brazilian center.MELD 评分实施对肝脏分配的影响:巴西中心的经验。
Ann Hepatol. 2013 May-Jun;12(3):440-7.
2
Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.巴西实施终末期肝病模型系统进行肝脏分配的后果。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
3
Testing liver allocation in São Paulo, Brazil: the relationship of model for end-stage liver disease implementation with a reduction in waiting-list mortality.巴西圣保罗的肝脏分配测试:终末期肝病模型实施与等待名单死亡率降低之间的关系。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Oct;44(8):2283-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.045.
4
Model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation system for liver transplantation in Argentina: does it work outside the United States?阿根廷肝移植基于终末期肝病模型的分配系统:它在美国以外的地方有效吗?
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Sep;12(7):456-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00199.x.
5
The MELD system and liver transplant waiting-list mortality in developing countries: lessons learned from São Paulo, Brazil.发展中国家的终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统与肝移植等待名单上的死亡率:来自巴西圣保罗的经验教训。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul-Sep;10(3):278-85. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082012000300004.
6
Waiting time predicts survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry.等待时间可预测肝细胞癌肝移植后的生存率:一项使用器官共享联合网络登记处的队列研究。
Liver Transpl. 2014 Sep;20(9):1045-56. doi: 10.1002/lt.23917. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
7
Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.阿根廷采用终末期肝病模型为基础的肝脏分配政策后,等待名单结果得到改善。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):711-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.23665.
8
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
9
Survival outcomes of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation for patients with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores.终末期肝病模型评分高的患者右半肝活体肝移植的生存结果。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Jun;12(3):256-62. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60042-9.
10
Impact of MELD 30-allocation policy on liver transplant outcomes in Italy.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分30分分配政策对意大利肝移植结局的影响。
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling kidney outcomes based on MELD eras - impact of MELD score in renal endpoints after liver transplantation.基于 MELD 时代的肾脏结局建模 - 肝移植后肾脏终点的 MELD 评分影响。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Aug 23;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02912-6.
2
Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplant in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Is There an Appropriate Upper Age Cutoff?老年慢性肾脏病患者的肝肾联合移植:是否存在合适的年龄上限?
Transplantation. 2020 Dec;104(12):2538-2546. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003147.
3
The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.
肝移植风险评分可预测肝移植受者的预后。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Jun;23(6):927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 11.