• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.肝移植风险评分可预测肝移植受者的预后。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Jun;23(6):927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
Preoperative Stratification of Liver Transplant Recipients: Validation of the LTRS.肝移植受者术前分层:LTRS 的验证。
Transplantation. 2020 Dec;104(12):e332-e341. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003353.
3
Development and validation of the HALT-HCC score to predict mortality in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.HALT-HCC 评分的开发和验证:用于预测肝癌肝移植受者死亡率的回顾性队列分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;2(8):595-603. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30106-1. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.通过供体和受体特征的策略性匹配优化再次肝移植移植物的效用。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/lt.24138.
5
Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.终末期肝病模型评分高且移植物过小的成年受者的预后改善。
Liver Transpl. 2009 May;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.1002/lt.21606.
6
Outcomes of Liver Transplant Candidates with Primary Biliary Cholangitis: The Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.原发性胆汁性胆管炎肝移植候选者的结局:来自移植受者科学登记处的数据。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Feb;65(2):416-422. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05786-1. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
7
MELD score measured day 10 after orthotopic liver transplantation predicts death and re-transplantation within the first year.原位肝移植术后第10天测得的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分可预测患者在第一年内的死亡和再次移植情况。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1360-6. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1196497. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
8
Liver Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: Is Age Just a Number?老年受者肝移植:年龄只是一个数字吗?
Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):5737-5743. doi: 10.1177/00031348231173998. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
The impact of viral hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma to post-transplant outcomes.病毒性肝炎相关肝细胞癌对移植后结局的影响。
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Jan;23(1):53-61. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12449. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
A novel prognostic nomogram accurately predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: analysis of 865 consecutive liver transplant recipients.一种新型预后列线图可准确预测肝移植后肝细胞癌复发:对865例连续肝移植受者的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):416-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.025. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Combination of Frailty and Sarcopenia Predicts Peri-operative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.衰弱与肌肉减少症的组合可预测肝移植患者的围手术期结局:基于全国住院患者样本的分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09255-w.
2
Atrial arrhythmias following lung transplantation: A state of the art review.肺移植术后房性心律失常:最新综述
World J Transplant. 2025 Jun 18;15(2):101005. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i2.101005.
3
The Liver Transplant Comorbidity Index (LTCI): A composite index of ambulatory pre-LT factors to identify patients at increased risk of post-LT mortality.肝移植合并症指数(LTCI):一种用于识别肝移植后死亡风险增加患者的肝移植前门诊因素综合指数。
Hepatology. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001320.
4
Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-HCC patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.预测终末期肝病模型钠评分(MELD-Na)高于30分的非肝癌患者在接受脑死亡供体肝移植后的无效结局:一项回顾性国际多中心队列研究
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3148-3158. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280.
5
The BAR Score Predicts and Stratifies Outcomes Following Liver Retransplantation: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Study.BAR 评分可预测和分层肝移植后结局:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jan 16;37:12104. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12104. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of Perioperative Mortality of Cadaveric Liver Transplant Recipients During Their Evaluations.预测尸肝移植受者评估期间的围手术期死亡率。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):e297-e307. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002810.
2
Sarcopenia Predicts Post-transplant Mortality in Acutely Ill Men Undergoing Urgent Evaluation and Liver Transplantation.肌肉减少症预测急性危重症男性接受紧急评估和肝移植后的移植后死亡率。
Transplantation. 2019 Nov;103(11):2312-2317. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002741.
3
Age and liver transplantation.年龄与肝移植。
J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):745-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Early mortality after liver transplantation: Defining the course and the cause.肝移植术后早期死亡:定义病程和病因。
Surgery. 2018 Oct;164(4):694-704. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.039. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Predictive modeling of treatment resistant depression using data from STAR*D and an independent clinical study.使用来自 STAR*D 和一项独立临床研究的数据对治疗抵抗性抑郁症进行预测建模。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0197268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197268. eCollection 2018.
6
No Gains in Long-term Survival After Liver Transplantation Over the Past Three Decades.过去三十年来,肝移植后长期生存率并未提高。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):20-27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002650.
7
Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration.等待肝移植患者特征的趋势将导致因临床病情恶化而被从等待名单中移除的比例增加。
Transplantation. 2017 Oct;101(10):2368-2374. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001851.
8
Impact of acute-on-chronic liver failure on 90-day mortality following a first liver transplantation.急性-on-慢性肝衰竭对首次肝移植后90天死亡率的影响。 (注:这里“acute-on-chronic”不太常见,可根据具体医学语境准确理解其含义,比如可能是“急性加慢性”等意思,整体翻译尽量保留原文表述以符合专业文献翻译要求)
Liver Int. 2017 May;37(5):684-693. doi: 10.1111/liv.13355. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.机器学习算法可预测肝移植后的移植物失败。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):e125-e132. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001600.
10
Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.与医疗决策相关的认知偏差:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.

肝移植风险评分可预测肝移植受者的预后。

The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Department of Surgery (Statistics), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2021 Jun;23(6):927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.002
PMID:33189566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8110600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assessed if the risk of post-liver transplant mortality within 24 h could be stratified at the time of listing using the liver transplant risk score (LTRS). Secondary aims were to assess if the LTRS could stratify the risk of 30-day, 1-year mortality, and survival beyond the first year.

METHODS

MELD, BMI, age, diabetes, and the need for dialysis were the five variables used to calculate the LTRS during patients' evaluation for liver transplantation. Mortality rates at 24 h, 30 days, and 1-year were compared among groups of patients with different LTRS. Patients with ABO-incompatibility, redo, multivisceral, partial graft and malignancies except for hepatocellular carcinoma were excluded. Data of 48,616 adult liver transplant recipients were extracted from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2002 and 2017.

RESULTS

24-h mortality was 0.9%, 1.0%, 1.1%, 1.7%, 2.3%, 2.0% and 3.5% for patients with LTRS of 0,1,2,3,4, 5 and ≥ 6, respectively (P < 0.001). 30-day mortality was 3.5%, 4.2%, 4.9%, 6.2%, 7.6%, 7.2% and 10.1% respectively (P < 0.001). 1-year mortality was 8.6%, 10.8%, 12.9%, 13.9%, 18.5%, 20.3% and 28.6% respectively (P < 0.001). 10-year survival was 61%, 56%, 57%, 54%, 47%, and 31% for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and ≥ 6 points respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative mortality and long-term survival of patients undergoing LT can be accurately estimated at the time of listing by the LTRS.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在进行肝移植时,使用肝移植风险评分(LTRS)是否可以在 24 小时内对术后死亡风险进行分层。次要目的是评估 LTRS 是否可以分层 30 天、1 年死亡率以及 1 年以上的生存率。

方法

在评估患者进行肝移植时,MELD、BMI、年龄、糖尿病和透析需求这五个变量用于计算 LTRS。比较不同 LTRS 分组患者的 24 小时、30 天和 1 年死亡率。排除 ABO 不相容、再次移植、多器官、部分移植物和除肝细胞癌以外的恶性肿瘤患者。本研究从 2002 年至 2017 年从 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 中提取了 48616 例成人肝移植受者的数据。

结果

LTRS 为 0、1、2、3、4、5 和≥6 的患者,其 24 小时死亡率分别为 0.9%、1.0%、1.1%、1.7%、2.3%、2.0%和 3.5%(P<0.001)。30 天死亡率分别为 3.5%、4.2%、4.9%、6.2%、7.6%、7.2%和 10.1%(P<0.001)。1 年死亡率分别为 8.6%、10.8%、12.9%、13.9%、18.5%、20.3%和 28.6%(P<0.001)。LTRS 为 0、1、2、3、4、5 和≥6 的患者 10 年生存率分别为 61%、56%、57%、54%、47%、31%(P<0.001)。

结论

LTRS 可在肝移植患者进行肝移植时准确评估围手术期死亡率和长期生存率。