• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿根廷采用终末期肝病模型为基础的肝脏分配政策后,等待名单结果得到改善。

Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.

机构信息

Transplant Society of Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):711-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.23665.

DOI:10.1002/lt.23665
PMID:23775946
Abstract

In July 2005, Argentina became the first country after the United States to introduce the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for organ allocation. In this study, we investigated waiting-list (WL) outcomes (n = 3272) and post-liver transplantation (LT) survival in 2 consecutive periods of 5 years before and after the implementation of a MELD-based allocation policy. Data were obtained from the database of the national institute for organ allocation in Argentina. After the adoption of the MELD system, there were significant reductions in WL mortality [28.5% versus 21.9%, P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-1.81] and total dropout rates (38.6% versus 29.1%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16-1.48) despite significantly less LT accessibility (57.4% versus 50.7%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.39-1.68). The annual number of deaths per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 273 in 2005 to 173 in 2010, and the number of LT procedures per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 564 to 422. MELD and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium scores were excellent predictors of 3-month WL mortality with c statistics of 0.828 and 0.857, respectively (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in 1-year posttransplant survival between the 2 periods (81.1% versus 81.3%). Although patients with a MELD score > 30 had lower posttransplant survival, the global accuracy of the score for predicting outcomes was poor, as indicated by a c statistic of only 0.523. Patients with granted MELD exceptions (158 for hepatocellular carcinoma and 52 for other reasons) had significantly higher access to LT (80.4%) in comparison with nonexception patients with equivalent listing priority (MELD score = 18-25; 54.6%, P < 0.001, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.40-0.61). In conclusion, the adoption of the MELD model in Argentina has resulted in improved liver organ allocation without compromising posttransplant survival.

摘要

2005 年 7 月,阿根廷成为继美国之后第一个引入终末期肝病模型(MELD)进行器官分配的国家。本研究调查了实施 MELD 分配政策前后连续 5 年的等待名单(WL)结局(n=3272)和肝移植(LT)后生存率。数据来自阿根廷国家器官分配研究所的数据库。采用 MELD 系统后,WL 死亡率显著降低[28.5%比 21.9%,P<0.001,风险比(HR)=1.57,95%置信区间(CI)=1.37-1.81],总失访率降低[38.6%比 29.1%,P<0.001,HR=1.31,95%CI=1.16-1.48],尽管 LT 可及性显著降低[57.4%比 50.7%,P<0.001,HR=1.53,95%CI=1.39-1.68]。每 1000 个风险患者年的死亡人数从 2005 年的 273 人减少到 2010 年的 173 人,每 1000 个风险患者年的 LT 例数从 564 例减少到 422 例。MELD 和终末期肝病模型钠评分是 WL 3 个月死亡率的优秀预测指标,C 统计量分别为 0.828 和 0.857(P<0.001)。两个时期的 1 年移植后生存率无差异(81.1%比 81.3%)。尽管 MELD 评分>30 的患者移植后生存率较低,但评分预测结局的整体准确性较差,C 统计量仅为 0.523。获得 MELD 豁免的患者(158 例为肝细胞癌,52 例为其他原因)获得 LT 的机会明显高于具有同等列表优先级(MELD 评分=18-25)的非豁免患者(54.6%,P<0.001,HR=0.49,95%CI=0.40-0.61)。结论,阿根廷采用 MELD 模型进行肝脏器官分配,提高了分配公平性,同时并未降低移植后生存率。

相似文献

1
Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.阿根廷采用终末期肝病模型为基础的肝脏分配政策后,等待名单结果得到改善。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):711-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.23665.
2
A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list.一种在共同的肝移植等待名单上为肝癌患者和非肝癌患者分配公平性的方法。
J Hepatol. 2014 Feb;60(2):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
3
Testing liver allocation in São Paulo, Brazil: the relationship of model for end-stage liver disease implementation with a reduction in waiting-list mortality.巴西圣保罗的肝脏分配测试:终末期肝病模型实施与等待名单死亡率降低之间的关系。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Oct;44(8):2283-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.045.
4
Model for end-stage liver disease-sodium and survival benefit in liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型钠与肝移植的生存获益。
Transpl Int. 2013 Feb;26(2):138-44. doi: 10.1111/tri.12008. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
5
Results after the adoption of a MELD/PELD-based liver allocation policy in Argentina.阿根廷采用基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)/儿童终末期肝病模型(PELD)的肝脏分配政策后的结果。
Pediatr Transplant. 2015 Feb;19(1):56-61. doi: 10.1111/petr.12395. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
6
The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis.终末期肝病模型肝移植分配系统可拯救生命,但会增加发病率和成本:前瞻性结局分析。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Jun;17(6):674-84. doi: 10.1002/lt.22228.
7
Model for end-stage liver disease and model for end-stage liver disease-Na scores predict both before-listing and wait-list mortality.终末期肝病模型和终末期肝病-钠评分可预测等待肝移植前及等待肝移植期间的死亡率。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.037.
8
Survival on waiting list for liver transplantation before and after introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分引入前后肝移植等待名单上的生存率
Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005.
9
Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.巴西实施终末期肝病模型系统进行肝脏分配的后果。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
10
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.肝细胞癌的肝移植:终末期肝病模型(MELD)的影响
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jan;10(1):36-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.20012.

引用本文的文献

1
The building of an institutional liver transplant registry: opportunities and challenges.建立机构肝移植登记系统:机遇与挑战。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jul;52(7):3000605241264232. doi: 10.1177/03000605241264232.
2
Liver transplantation in Latin America: reality and challenges.拉丁美洲的肝移植:现状与挑战。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Nov 18;28:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100633. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Validation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD-Na) score in the Eurotransplant region.验证终末期肝病模型钠(MELD-Na)评分在 Eurotransplant 地区的适用性。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):229-240. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16142. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America: Diagnosis and treatment challenges.拉丁美洲的肝细胞癌:诊断和治疗挑战。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 7;24(37):4224-4229. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i37.4224.
5
THE IMPACT OF THE MELD SCORE ON LIVER TRANSPLANT ALLOCATION AND RESULTS: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对肝移植分配及结果的影响:一项综合综述。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):65-68. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010018.
6
Hepatitis C virus infection in Argentina: Burden of chronic disease.阿根廷的丙型肝炎病毒感染:慢性病负担
World J Hepatol. 2016 May 28;8(15):649-58. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i15.649.
7
Organ donor allocation system for liver transplantation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Call for major revision.沙特阿拉伯王国肝脏移植的器官捐赠分配系统:呼吁进行重大修订。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):267-8. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.166202.