Suppr超能文献

剂量强度在骨肉瘤新辅助化疗中的重要性:术前使用大剂量甲氨蝶呤、顺铂和阿霉素的回顾性分析

The importance of dose-intensity in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: a retrospective analysis of high-dose methotrexate, cisplatinum and adriamycin used preoperatively.

作者信息

Bacci G, Picci P, Avella M, Dallari D, Ferrari S, Prasad R, Di Scioscio M, Malaguti C, Caldora P

机构信息

Servizio Medicina Interna, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1990 Apr;2(2):127-35. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1990.11738996.

Abstract

The relationship between dose-intensity and outcome was retrospectively analyzed in 125 patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1986 and 1988. Before surgery, chemotherapy was performed with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) i.v. followed by cisplatinum (CDP) i.a. and adriamycin (ADM) i.v. Postoperative chemotherapy was tailored according to the necrosis induced by preoperative treatment. Patients who were "good responders" had 31-weeks of chemotherapy with the same drugs utilized preoperatively, while "poor responder" patients received a longer treatment (40 weeks) in which ifosfamide and etoposide (VP-16) were added to HDMTX, CDP and ADM. At a median follow-up of 2 years (1-3 years) 100 patients (80%) remained continuously disease-free and 25 patients relapsed: 24 with lung metastases and 1 with local recurrence. According to the real dose-intensity received, calculated as a percentage of the dose intensity projected by the protocol, the continuously disease-free survival was 87% in the 82 patients who received 80% or more of the scheduled dose-intensity and only 65% for the 43 patients who received less than 80% of the projected dose-intensity. This difference is highly significant (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma the real dose-intensity delivered is a determinant of treatment outcome and therefore every effort should be made to avoid reductions of doses and delays of cycles of chemotherapy in these patients.

摘要

对1986年至1988年间在我院接受新辅助化疗的125例肢体骨肉瘤患者的剂量强度与治疗结果之间的关系进行了回顾性分析。手术前,采用大剂量甲氨蝶呤(HDMTX)静脉注射,随后顺铂(CDP)动脉注射和阿霉素(ADM)静脉注射进行化疗。术后化疗根据术前治疗引起的坏死情况进行调整。“反应良好”的患者接受31周的化疗,使用与术前相同的药物,而“反应较差”的患者接受更长时间的治疗(40周),即在HDMTX、CDP和ADM的基础上加用异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷(VP-16)。中位随访2年(1至3年)时,100例患者(80%)持续无病,25例患者复发:24例有肺转移,1例局部复发。根据实际接受的剂量强度(计算为方案预计剂量强度的百分比),接受预定剂量强度80%或更多的82例患者的持续无病生存率为87%,而接受预计剂量强度不到80%的43例患者的持续无病生存率仅为65%。这种差异具有高度显著性(P<0.01)。这些结果表明,在骨肉瘤的新辅助化疗中,实际给予的剂量强度是治疗结果的一个决定因素,因此应尽一切努力避免这些患者化疗剂量的减少和周期的延迟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验