Jack McBain Biomechanical Testing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B9.
J Biomech. 2013 May 31;46(9):1477-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
The use of finite element models as research tools in biomechanics and orthopedics has grown exponentially over the last 20 years. However, the attention to mesh quality, model validation and appropriate energy balance methods and the reporting of these metrics has not kept pace with the general use of finite element modeling. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to summarize the current state of finite element modeling validation practices from the literature in biomechanics and orthopedics and to present specific methods and criteria limits that can be used as guidelines to assess mesh quality, validate simulation results and address energy balance issues. Of the finite element models reviewed from the literature, approximately 42% of them were not adequately validated, while 95% and 98% of the models did not assess the quality of the mesh or energy balance, respectively. A review of the methods that can be used to assess the quality of a mesh (e.g., aspect ratios, angle idealization and element Jacobians), measure the balance of energies (e.g., hour glass energy and mass scaling), and quantify the accuracy of the simulations (e.g., validation metrics, corridors, statistical techniques) are presented.
在过去的 20 年中,有限元模型作为生物力学和矫形学的研究工具得到了飞速发展。然而,对网格质量、模型验证以及适当的能量平衡方法的关注,以及对这些指标的报告并没有跟上有限元建模的普遍使用。因此,本综述的目的是总结生物力学和矫形学文献中有限元建模验证实践的现状,并提出可作为评估网格质量、验证模拟结果和解决能量平衡问题的指南的具体方法和标准限值。在从文献中回顾的有限元模型中,大约有 42%的模型没有得到充分验证,而 95%和 98%的模型分别没有评估网格质量或能量平衡。本文回顾了可用于评估网格质量的方法(例如,纵横比、角度理想化和单元雅可比)、测量能量平衡的方法(例如,沙漏能和质量缩放)以及量化模拟准确性的方法(例如,验证指标、通道、统计技术)。