• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助放化疗后食管癌的淋巴结清扫。

Lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):3038-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4
PMID:23625142
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).

METHODS

An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7%, 29.7 months and 30.4%, and 17.7 months and 25.4% (p=0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后食管癌淋巴结清扫对生存的影响。

方法

对接受 nCRT 后手术切除的食管癌患者进行分析,以确定切除淋巴结数量与生存之间的关系。根据 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩分析计算总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)曲线。采用Cox 比例风险模型进行多变量分析(MVA)。

结果

我们共纳入 358 例患者,平均随访 27.3 个月。淋巴结清扫的数量不受手术方式的影响。切除的淋巴结数量(<10 与≥10、<12 与≥12、<15 与≥15)并不影响 OS 或 DFS。我们发现病理反应对 OS 和 DFS 有显著影响。完全、部分和无反应患者的中位 OS 和 5 年 OS 分别为 65.6 个月和 52.7%、29.7 个月和 30.4%、17.7 个月和 25.4%(p=0.0002)。然而,当根据病理反应对患者进行分层时,淋巴结清扫数量并不影响 OS 和 DFS。MVA 还显示,淋巴结清扫数量对 OS 和 DFS 无预后意义。较高的年龄、较高的分期和不完全反应与 OS 降低相关。较高的分期和不完全反应与较差的 DFS 相关。

结论

nCRT 后食管癌淋巴结清扫数量不影响生存。分期和病理反应仍然是 nCRT 后食管癌生存的最强预后因素。

相似文献

1
Lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管癌的淋巴结清扫。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):3038-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
2
Pathologic nonresponders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer demonstrate no survival benefit compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy.与接受单纯手术治疗的患者相比,新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解的食管癌患者无生存获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1678-84. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2078-4. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
3
The prognostic value of residual nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in patients with complete primary tumor response.新辅助放化疗后原发肿瘤完全缓解的食管癌患者残留淋巴结疾病的预后价值。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):597-602. doi: 10.1002/jso.24050. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
4
Single-institution retrospective comparison of preoperative versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.单机构对食管癌腺癌术前与根治性放化疗的回顾性比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3744-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3795-2. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: does delayed surgery impact outcome?新辅助放化疗与手术治疗食管鳞癌的时间间隔:手术延迟是否影响预后?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4245-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3139-7.
6
Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后食管癌鳞状细胞癌淋巴结清扫的治疗价值
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;112(1):60-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23965. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
Treatment of clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.临床T2N0M0期食管癌的治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3739-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3929-6. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
8
Oncologic Outcomes According to Remnant Lymph Node Metastases in Pathologic T0 (ypT0) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following Prospective Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery.前瞻性新辅助治疗及手术后,病理T0(ypT0)食管鳞状细胞癌中残留淋巴结转移的肿瘤学结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1851-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4195-3. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
9
[Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma].[切除淋巴结数量对晚期食管癌TNM分期及生存的影响]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;29(8):604-8.
10
Locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival predicted by ([18F])FDG-PET/CT.局部晚期食管腺癌:[18F]FDG-PET/CT 预测新辅助化疗的反应和生存。
Acta Oncol. 2012 May;51(5):636-44. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.643822. Epub 2012 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in the Highest Quartile Enhances Staging and Prognosis for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy.最高四分位数的检查淋巴结数量可改善接受新辅助治疗的食管癌患者的分期和预后。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18237-1.
2
Impact of Dissected Lymph Node Count and Positive Lymph Node Ratio Following Esophagectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.食管癌切除术后清扫淋巴结数量及阳性淋巴结比例对长期预后的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 13;6(2):e587. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000587. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: an update on experiences from a tertiary cancer care center in India.
机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者:印度一家三级癌症护理中心的经验更新
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Jun 15;28(2):74-80. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.74.
4
Optimal lymph node dissection thresholds for early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study.早期食管鳞状细胞癌的最佳淋巴结清扫阈值:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11822-1.
5
Therapeutic Effect of Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Followed by Esophagectomy on Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using the Efficacy Index.新辅助放化疗后行淋巴结清扫并食管切除治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效指数评估其治疗效果
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Mar;16(6):e70057. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70057.
6
Lymph node metastases status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a single-center cross-sectional study.新辅助放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移状态:一项单中心横断面研究
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jan 17;10:8. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-76. eCollection 2025.
7
Metastatic patterns of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without neoadjuvant therapy.未经新辅助治疗的胸段食管鳞癌的隆突下、右和左喉返神经淋巴结转移模式。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;150(8):387. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05911-2.
8
Impact of the number of lymph node dissections and a novel risk stratification on the prognosis in elderly locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.淋巴结清扫数量及一种新的风险分层对老年局部晚期食管腺癌预后的影响
J Cancer. 2024 Jun 3;15(13):4197-4204. doi: 10.7150/jca.96574. eCollection 2024.
9
The number of resected lymph nodes from the upper mediastinal area predicts long-term outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after minimally invasive esophagectomy.上纵隔区切除的淋巴结数目可预测微创食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的长期预后。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3625-3635. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10853-4. Epub 2024 May 20.
10
Recurrence timing and patterns incorporating lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.新辅助放化疗加食管切除术后食管癌复发时间及模式与淋巴结状态的关系
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 6;14:1310073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1310073. eCollection 2024.