Burdon William M, St De Lore Jef, Dang Jeff, Warda Umma S, Prendergast Michael L
University of California, Los Angeles, Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90025.
J Exp Criminol. 2013 Mar 1;9(1):45-64. doi: 10.1007/s11292-012-9169-5.
To assess the impact of a positive behavioral reinforcement intervention on psychosocial functioning of inmates over the course of treatment and on post-treatment self-reported measures of treatment participation, progress, and satisfaction.
Male ( = 187) and female ( = 143) inmates participating in 12-week prison-based Intensive Outpatient (IOP) drug treatment were randomly assigned to receive standard treatment (ST) or standard treatment plus positive behavioral reinforcement (BR) for engaging in targeted activities and behaviors. Participants were assessed for psychosocial functioning at baseline and at the conclusion of treatment (post-treatment). Self-reported measures of treatment participation, treatment progress, and treatment satisfaction were also captured at post-treatment.
The intervention affected female and male subjects differently and not always in a way that favored BR subjects, as compared to the ST subjects, most notably on measures of depression and criminal thinking.
Possible explanations for the results include differences in the male and female custody environments combined with the procedures that study participants had to follow to earn and/or receive positive reinforcement at the two study sites, as well as baseline differences between the genders and a possible floor effect among females on measures of criminality. Limitations of the study included the inability to make study participants blind to the study conditions and the possible over-branding of the study, which may have influenced the results.
评估积极行为强化干预措施在治疗过程中对囚犯心理社会功能的影响,以及对治疗后自我报告的治疗参与度、进展和满意度的影响。
参与为期12周的监狱强化门诊(IOP)药物治疗的187名男性和143名女性囚犯被随机分配接受标准治疗(ST)或标准治疗加积极行为强化(BR),后者针对参与特定活动和行为给予强化。在基线和治疗结束时(治疗后)对参与者的心理社会功能进行评估。治疗后还收集了自我报告的治疗参与度、治疗进展和治疗满意度的指标。
与标准治疗组相比,该干预措施对男性和女性受试者的影响不同,且并非总是对接受积极行为强化的受试者有利,最明显的是在抑郁和犯罪思维指标方面。
结果的可能解释包括男女监禁环境的差异,以及两个研究地点的参与者为获得和/或接受积极强化而必须遵循的程序,还有性别之间的基线差异以及女性在犯罪指标上可能存在的下限效应。该研究的局限性包括无法让研究参与者对研究条件不知情,以及研究可能存在过度标签化的情况,这可能影响了结果。