Suppr超能文献

关节内透明质酸注射与经皮神经电刺激治疗膝骨关节炎的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, ROC.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA; ARTZ) and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinic of a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with knee osteoarthritis (N=50; aged 51-80y) were randomly assigned to the HA group (n=27) or the TENS group (n=23).

INTERVENTIONS

The HA group received intra-articular HA injection into the affected knee once a week for 5 consecutive weeks, and the TENS group received a 20- minute session of TENS 3 times a week for 4 consecutive weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures used were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Lequesne index. The secondary outcome measures were range of motion of the knee, walking time, pain threshold, patient global assessment, and disability in activities of daily living. All subjects were assessed at baseline, and at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months after the treatments were completed.

RESULTS

The TENS group exhibited a significantly greater improvement in VAS than the HA group at 2 weeks' follow-up (4.17 ± 1.98 vs 5.31 ± 1.78, respectively; P=.03). In addition, the TENS group also exhibited a significantly greater improvement in the Lequesne index than the HA group at 2 weeks' follow-up (7.78 ± 2.08 vs 9.85 ± 3.54, respectively; P=.01) and at 3 months' follow-up (7.07 ± 2.85 vs 9.24 ± 4.04, respectively; P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TENS with silver spike point electrodes was observed to be more effective than intra-articular HA injection for patients with knee osteoarthritis in improving the VAS for pain at 2 weeks' follow-up as well as the Lequesne index at 2 weeks' and 3 months' follow-up.

摘要

目的

比较关节内透明质酸(HA;ARTZ)和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗膝骨关节炎患者的效果。

设计

前瞻性、随机对照试验。

地点

教学医院的康复诊所。

参与者

膝骨关节炎患者(N=50;年龄 51-80 岁)被随机分配到 HA 组(n=27)或 TENS 组(n=23)。

干预措施

HA 组每周在受影响的膝关节内注射一次 HA,连续 5 周,TENS 组每周接受 20 分钟的 TENS 治疗,连续 4 周,共 3 次。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标为疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 Lequesne 指数。次要观察指标为膝关节活动度、行走时间、疼痛阈值、患者总体评估和日常生活活动能力障碍。所有受试者在基线时以及治疗完成后 2 周、2 个月和 3 个月进行评估。

结果

TENS 组在 2 周随访时 VAS 评分的改善明显优于 HA 组(分别为 4.17±1.98 与 5.31±1.78,P=.03)。此外,TENS 组在 2 周和 3 个月随访时 Lequesne 指数的改善也明显优于 HA 组(分别为 7.78±2.08 与 9.85±3.54,P=.01;7.07±2.85 与 9.24±4.04,P=.03)。

结论

与关节内注射 HA 相比,在 2 周随访时,TENS(采用银质棘突电极)更能有效改善膝骨关节炎患者的 VAS 疼痛评分,以及 2 周和 3 个月随访时的 Lequesne 指数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验