• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节内透明质酸注射与经皮神经电刺激治疗膝骨关节炎的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, ROC.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.009
PMID:23628378
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA; ARTZ) and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinic of a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with knee osteoarthritis (N=50; aged 51-80y) were randomly assigned to the HA group (n=27) or the TENS group (n=23).

INTERVENTIONS

The HA group received intra-articular HA injection into the affected knee once a week for 5 consecutive weeks, and the TENS group received a 20- minute session of TENS 3 times a week for 4 consecutive weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures used were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Lequesne index. The secondary outcome measures were range of motion of the knee, walking time, pain threshold, patient global assessment, and disability in activities of daily living. All subjects were assessed at baseline, and at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months after the treatments were completed.

RESULTS

The TENS group exhibited a significantly greater improvement in VAS than the HA group at 2 weeks' follow-up (4.17 ± 1.98 vs 5.31 ± 1.78, respectively; P=.03). In addition, the TENS group also exhibited a significantly greater improvement in the Lequesne index than the HA group at 2 weeks' follow-up (7.78 ± 2.08 vs 9.85 ± 3.54, respectively; P=.01) and at 3 months' follow-up (7.07 ± 2.85 vs 9.24 ± 4.04, respectively; P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TENS with silver spike point electrodes was observed to be more effective than intra-articular HA injection for patients with knee osteoarthritis in improving the VAS for pain at 2 weeks' follow-up as well as the Lequesne index at 2 weeks' and 3 months' follow-up.

摘要

目的

比较关节内透明质酸(HA;ARTZ)和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗膝骨关节炎患者的效果。

设计

前瞻性、随机对照试验。

地点

教学医院的康复诊所。

参与者

膝骨关节炎患者(N=50;年龄 51-80 岁)被随机分配到 HA 组(n=27)或 TENS 组(n=23)。

干预措施

HA 组每周在受影响的膝关节内注射一次 HA,连续 5 周,TENS 组每周接受 20 分钟的 TENS 治疗,连续 4 周,共 3 次。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标为疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 Lequesne 指数。次要观察指标为膝关节活动度、行走时间、疼痛阈值、患者总体评估和日常生活活动能力障碍。所有受试者在基线时以及治疗完成后 2 周、2 个月和 3 个月进行评估。

结果

TENS 组在 2 周随访时 VAS 评分的改善明显优于 HA 组(分别为 4.17±1.98 与 5.31±1.78,P=.03)。此外,TENS 组在 2 周和 3 个月随访时 Lequesne 指数的改善也明显优于 HA 组(分别为 7.78±2.08 与 9.85±3.54,P=.01;7.07±2.85 与 9.24±4.04,P=.03)。

结论

与关节内注射 HA 相比,在 2 周随访时,TENS(采用银质棘突电极)更能有效改善膝骨关节炎患者的 VAS 疼痛评分,以及 2 周和 3 个月随访时的 Lequesne 指数。

相似文献

1
Comparison of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.关节内透明质酸注射与经皮神经电刺激治疗膝骨关节炎的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
2
Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injection versus hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation as treatments for cartilage pathology: from early degeneration to osteoarthritis.富血小板血浆关节内注射与透明质酸黏弹性补充治疗软骨病变:从早期退变到骨关节炎。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Nov;27(11):1490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
3
Comparison of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential currents, and shortwave diathermy in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study.经皮神经电刺激、干扰电与短波透热疗法治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的比较:一项双盲、随机、对照、多中心研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):748-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.037. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
4
Kinetics features changes before and after intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者关节腔内注射透明质酸前后的动力学特征变化。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;129 Suppl 1:S21-6. doi: 10.1016/S0303-8467(15)30007-X.
5
Is hyaluronate sodium effective in the management of knee osteoarthritis? A placebo-controlled double-blind study.透明质酸钠治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效评价:一项安慰剂对照双盲研究。
Minerva Med. 2010 Apr;101(2):63-72.
6
Intra-Articular, Single-Shot Hylan G-F 20 Hyaluronic Acid Injection Compared with Corticosteroid in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.膝关节骨关节炎中关节内单次注射透明质酸凝胶Hylan G-F 20与皮质类固醇的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 1;98(11):885-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00544.
7
Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.透明质酸与富血小板血浆:一项比较临床结果及对膝关节骨关节炎关节内生物学影响的前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):339-346. doi: 10.1177/0363546516665809. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Intra-articular hyaluronan is without clinical effect in knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of 337 patients followed for 1 year.关节内透明质酸对膝骨关节炎没有临床效果:一项对 337 例患者进行的为期 1 年的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jun;69(6):1097-102. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.118042. Epub 2010 May 6.
9
Comparison of Single Intra-Articular Injection of Novel Hyaluronan (HYA-JOINT Plus) with Synvisc-One for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of Efficacy and Safety.新型透明质酸(HYA-JOINT Plus)与施沛特单关节腔内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的比较:一项疗效与安全性的随机、对照、双盲试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Mar 15;99(6):462-471. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00469.
10
Effect of hyaluronic acid in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.透明质酸对有症状的髋关节骨关节炎的影响:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar;60(3):824-30. doi: 10.1002/art.24301.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances the efficacy of wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for mild knee osteoarthritis in the middle-aged person: a randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激增强可穿戴式经皮电神经刺激对中年轻度膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 15;26(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08924-1.
2
Electrode Placement Affects Clinical Outcome in Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Combined Cadaver Study and Randomized Controlled Trial.电极放置对膝骨关节炎经皮电神经刺激临床结果的影响:尸体研究与随机对照试验相结合
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00750-6.
3
The Role of Rehabilitation after Spinal Mesotherapy in a Three-Stage Treatment Concept.
脊柱中胚层疗法后康复在三阶段治疗理念中的作用。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3195. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113195.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Intra-Articular Injection, Physical Therapy, and Combined Treatments on Pain, Function, and Sarcopenia Indices in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.关节内注射、物理疗法和联合治疗对膝骨关节炎疼痛、功能和肌少症指标的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 23;24(7):6078. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076078.
5
The Fibromyalgia Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Physical Therapy Study Protocol: A Multisite Embedded Pragmatic Trial.纤维肌痛经皮神经电刺激物理治疗研究方案:多中心嵌入式实用临床试验。
Phys Ther. 2022 Nov 6;102(11). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac116.
6
Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.对 381 项评估经皮神经电刺激(TENS)缓解疼痛的临床研究特征进行描述:改善未来研究的 Meta-TENS 研究的二次分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 14;58(6):803. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060803.
7
Portable Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy at Different Frequencies in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Quasi-Experimental Study.不同频率便携式经皮电神经刺激疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的准实验研究
J Orthop Case Rep. 2020 May-Jun;10(3):108-113. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i03.1772.
8
Exercise Alters Gait Pattern but Not Knee Load in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.运动可改变膝骨关节炎患者的步态模式,但不会改变其膝关节负荷。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7468937. doi: 10.1155/2016/7468937. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Pain relief and improved physical function in knee osteoarthritis patients receiving ongoing hylan G-F 20, a high-molecular-weight hyaluronan, versus other treatment options: data from a large real-world longitudinal cohort in Canada.接受持续使用高分子量透明质酸hylan G-F 20的膝关节骨关节炎患者与其他治疗方案相比的疼痛缓解和身体功能改善:来自加拿大一个大型真实世界纵向队列的数据
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Oct 15;9:5633-40. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S88473. eCollection 2015.
10
Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with platelet-rich plasma in comparison with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation plus exercise: a randomized clinical trial.富血小板血浆与经皮电神经刺激加运动治疗膝关节骨关节炎的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Jun 27;29:223. eCollection 2015.