Azumi N, Joyce J, Battifora H
Sylvia Cowan Laboratory of Surgical Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Mod Pathol. 1990 May;3(3):368-72.
Microwave fixation in dilute aldehyde solution has been reported to be superior to fixation in formaldehyde for the preservation of antigens. We studied antigen preservation among tissues which were soaked in formaldehyde, dilute aldehyde, alcohol, and saline solution with or without microwave irradiation. Microwave fixation was found to be superior to conventional formaldehyde fixation with regard to antigen preservation. However, there was no detectable difference in immunostaining between any of the irradiated and nonirradiated alcohol-, aldehyde-, or even saline-treated tissues. Microwave-irradiated tissues, regardless of the fixative employed, displayed a tendency for tissue disintegration upon protease treatment, as is commonly seen in alcohol-fixed tissues. Our results suggest that the apparent improvement in antigen preservation when microwave fixation in dilute aldehyde solution is used is largely attributable to the fixation in alcohol during the graded alcohol dehydration steps in the tissue processor, rather than to any demonstrable effect of the microwave radiation per se.
据报道,在稀醛溶液中进行微波固定在抗原保存方面优于在甲醛中固定。我们研究了浸泡在甲醛、稀醛、酒精和盐溶液中且有或没有微波照射的组织中的抗原保存情况。发现在抗原保存方面,微波固定优于传统的甲醛固定。然而,在经照射和未经照射的酒精、醛甚至盐处理的组织之间,免疫染色没有可检测到的差异。无论使用何种固定剂,经微波照射的组织在蛋白酶处理后都有组织崩解的倾向,这在酒精固定的组织中很常见。我们的结果表明,当使用稀醛溶液进行微波固定时,抗原保存的明显改善很大程度上归因于组织处理仪中梯度酒精脱水步骤中的酒精固定,而不是微波辐射本身的任何可证明的效果。