• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找方法:开发儿科姑息治疗讨论提示清单的德尔菲研究。

Finding a way with words: Delphi study to develop a discussion prompt list for paediatric palliative care.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;34(3):291-299. doi: 10.1177/0269216319888988. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1177/0269216319888988
PMID:31752593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective communication is a cornerstone of quality paediatric palliative care. Families report struggling, however, to know what to discuss, with whom, and when. Although question prompt lists exist for adult palliative care, they do not suit the unique circumstances of paediatric palliative care.

AIM

To develop a prompt list suitable for paediatric palliative care.

DESIGN

Underpinned by Delphi methodology, a six-phase procedure was adopted: (1) drafting items based on the findings of a literature review, (2) condensing the list of items based on group discussion, (3) refining items based on a survey of expert healthcare professionals, (4) additional refining of items based on another survey of professionals, (5) further refining of items based on cognitive interviews with family members, and (6) final review by healthcare professional and family member groups.

PARTICIPANTS

Three participant groups were involved during various phases: (1) members of an Australasian paediatric palliative care national reference group, (2) healthcare professionals associated with a local paediatric palliative care service, and (3) family members who were users of the same local service.

RESULTS

Through multi-phase consultation across participant groups, the draft question prompt list was refined progressively to 28 items, split across two booklets to allow end-of-life items to be provided separately, and reconceptualised as a prompt list rather than a prompt list.

CONCLUSION

By involving representatives of major stakeholder groups, this study has facilitated the design of a prompt list suited to the circumstances of paediatric palliative care. Future research should trial the effectiveness of this resource.

摘要

背景

有效的沟通是儿童姑息治疗质量的基石。然而,家庭报告说,他们很难知道讨论什么、与谁讨论以及何时讨论。虽然成人姑息治疗有问题提示清单,但它们并不适合儿童姑息治疗的特殊情况。

目的

开发适合儿童姑息治疗的提示清单。

设计

在 Delphi 方法的基础上,采用了六阶段程序:(1)根据文献综述的结果起草项目,(2)根据小组讨论压缩项目清单,(3)根据对专业医疗保健专业人员的调查完善项目,(4)根据专业人员的另一项调查进一步完善项目,(5)根据家庭成员的认知访谈进一步完善项目,以及(6)医疗保健专业人员和家庭成员小组的最终审查。

参与者

在各个阶段涉及三个参与者群体:(1)澳大拉西亚儿科姑息治疗国家参考小组的成员,(2)与当地儿科姑息治疗服务相关的医疗保健专业人员,以及(3)同一当地服务的使用者的家庭成员。

结果

通过多阶段的参与者群体协商,草案问题提示清单逐步完善到 28 个项目,分为两册,以便单独提供临终关怀项目,并重新构想为提示清单而不是提示清单。

结论

通过让主要利益相关者群体的代表参与,本研究促进了适合儿童姑息治疗情况的提示清单的设计。未来的研究应试验该资源的有效性。

相似文献

1
Finding a way with words: Delphi study to develop a discussion prompt list for paediatric palliative care.寻找方法:开发儿科姑息治疗讨论提示清单的德尔菲研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;34(3):291-299. doi: 10.1177/0269216319888988. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
2
A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: development and cross-cultural evaluation.终末期晚期癌症患者问题提示清单:编制与跨文化评估
Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;27(8):779-88. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483659. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
3
Optimizing of a question prompt list to improve communication about the heart failure trajectory in patients, families, and health care professionals.优化问题提示清单,以改善心力衰竭轨迹在患者、家庭和医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 15;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00665-3.
4
Components and principles of a pediatric palliative care consultation: results of a Delphi study.儿科姑息治疗会诊的组成部分与原则:德尔菲研究结果
J Palliat Med. 2014 Nov;17(11):1206-13. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0121. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
5
Affording opportunities to discuss deterioration in paediatric palliative care consultations: a conversation analytic study.为探讨儿科姑息治疗咨询中病情恶化的问题提供机会:一项会话分析研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):e13. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001130. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation.达成儿科姑息治疗结局测量优先事项共识:一项改良 Delphi 调查、与儿童研究参与小组的互动以及专家项目生成的结果。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1509-1519. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
7
How and how much is spirituality discussed in palliative care consultations for advanced cancer patients with and without a question prompt list?在为有和没有问题提示清单的晚期癌症患者进行的姑息治疗咨询中,灵性问题是如何被讨论的,讨论的程度如何?
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2208-2213. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
Recommendations for a Patient Concerns Inventory specific to patients with head and neck cancer receiving palliative treatment.推荐一个针对接受姑息治疗的头颈部癌症患者的患者关注清单。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 17;31(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07471-y.
9
Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study.尊严谈话问题框架的开发和评估:一项针对姑息治疗患者及其家属的混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.家庭成员对住院姑息治疗咨询服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491620. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The participation of lifeworld experts in Delphi processes: A reflection on method and practice.生活世界专家参与德尔菲法流程:对方法与实践的思考。
MethodsX. 2025 Mar 19;14:103274. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103274. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Healthcare professionals' perspectives of providing end-of-life care for infants, children and young people in acute settings: A multi-site qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对在急性病环境中为婴儿、儿童和青少年提供临终关怀的看法:一项多地点定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2025 Apr;39(4):483-498. doi: 10.1177/02692163251320204. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Pediatric Advance Care Planning: A Scoping Review.
儿科预先护理计划:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 7;10(7):1179. doi: 10.3390/children10071179.
4
Factors affecting decision-making in children with complex care needs: a consensus approach to develop best practice in a UK children's hospital.影响有复杂护理需求的儿童决策的因素:英国儿童医院制定最佳实践的共识方法。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Sep;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001589.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Initiation of paediatric advance care planning: Cross-sectional survey of health professionals reported behaviour.儿科预先医疗照护计划的启动:健康专业人员报告行为的横断面调查。
Child Care Health Dev. 2022 May;48(3):423-434. doi: 10.1111/cch.12943. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Parents' experiences of initiation of paediatric advance care planning discussions: a qualitative study.家长在启动儿科预立医疗照护计划讨论中的体验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Mar;181(3):1185-1196. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04314-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
The Question-prompt list (QPL): Why it is needed in the Indian oncology setting?问题提示清单(QPL):为什么在印度肿瘤学环境中需要它?
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Apr;4(2):e1316. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1316. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Optimizing of a question prompt list to improve communication about the heart failure trajectory in patients, families, and health care professionals.优化问题提示清单,以改善心力衰竭轨迹在患者、家庭和医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 15;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00665-3.