Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 N.E. Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1;64(5):487-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.001742012.
OBJECTIVE This study examined effectiveness of collaborative care for depression among Asians treated either at a community health center that focuses on Asians (culturally sensitive clinic) or at general community health centers and among a matched population of whites treated at the same general community clinics. METHODS For 345 participants in a statewide collaborative care program, use of psychotropic medications, primary care visits with depression care managers, and depression severity (as measured with the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire) were tracked at baseline and 16 weeks. RESULTS After adjustment for differences in baseline demographic characteristics, all three groups had similar treatment process and depression outcomes. Asian patients served at the culturally sensitive clinic (N=129) were less likely than Asians (N=72) and whites (N=144) treated in general community health clinics to be prescribed psychotropic medications. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative care for depression showed similar response rates among all three groups.
目的 本研究考察了针对亚洲人群(在关注亚洲人群的社区卫生中心,即文化敏感诊所就诊)和与之相匹配的白人人群(在普通社区卫生中心就诊)的抑郁症患者,实施协作式护理的效果。
方法 对全州协作式护理项目中的 345 名参与者,在基线和 16 周时,对精神类药物的使用、与抑郁症护理经理的常规就诊情况以及抑郁严重程度(采用 9 项患者健康问卷进行测量)进行了跟踪。
结果 调整了基线人口统计学特征的差异后,所有三组的治疗过程和抑郁结局均相似。在文化敏感诊所接受治疗的亚裔患者(n=129),比在普通社区卫生中心接受治疗的亚裔患者(n=72)和白人患者(n=144),更不可能被开精神类药物。
结论 协作式护理对抑郁症的治疗效果在这三组人群中相似。