Derry Sheena, Moore R Andrew
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD008040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008040.pub3.
This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 11, 2010 (Derry 2010). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter analgesics. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce nausea and vomiting, which are commonly associated with migraine.
To determine the efficacy and tolerability of paracetamol (acetaminophen), alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared with placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine in adults.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Oxford Pain Relief Database for studies through 4 October 2010 for the original review, and to 13 February 2013 for the update. Two clinical trials registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com) were also searched on both occasions.
We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies using self-administered paracetamol to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants achieving each outcome were used to calculate relative risk and numbers needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared with placebo or other active treatment.
Searches for the update identified one additional study for inclusion. Eleven studies (2942 participants, 5109 attacks) compared paracetamol 1000 mg, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, with placebo or other active comparators, mainly sumatriptan 100 mg. For all efficacy outcomes paracetamol was superior to placebo, with NNTs of 12 (19% response with paracetamol, 10% with placebo), 5.0 (56% response with paracetamol, 36% with placebo) and 5.2 (39% response with paracetamol, 20% with placebo) for 2-hour pain-free and 2- and 1-hour headache relief, respectively, when medication was taken for moderate to severe pain.Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg was not significantly different from oral sumatriptan 100 mg for 2-hour headache relief; there were no 2-hour pain-free data.Adverse event rates were similar between paracetamol and placebo, and between paracetamol plus metoclopramide and sumatriptan. No serious adverse events occurred with paracetamol alone, but more serious and/or severe adverse events occurred with sumatriptan than with the combination therapy (NNH 32).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Paracetamol 1000 mg alone is statistically superior to placebo in the treatment of acute migraine, but the NNT of 12 for pain-free response at two hours is inferior to at of other commonly used analgesics. Given the low cost and wide availability of paracetamol, it may be a useful first choice drug for acute migraine in those with contraindications to, or who cannot tolerate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin. The addition of 10 mg metoclopramide gives short-term efficacy equivalent to oral sumatriptan 100 mg. Adverse events with paracetamol did not differ from placebo; serious and/or severe adverse events were slightly more common with sumatriptan than with paracetamol plus metoclopramide.
这是2010年第11期发表的原始Cochrane系统评价(Derry 2010)的更新版本。偏头痛是一种常见的致残性疾病,给个人、卫生服务和社会带来负担。许多患者选择不寻求或无法寻求专业帮助,而是依赖非处方镇痛药。联合使用止吐药有助于减轻偏头痛常见的恶心和呕吐症状。
确定对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)单独使用或与止吐药联合使用,与安慰剂及其他有效干预措施相比,在治疗成人急性偏头痛中的疗效和耐受性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE和牛津疼痛缓解数据库,以查找截至2010年10月4日用于原始评价的研究,以及截至2013年2月13日用于更新的研究。还在两个时间点检索了两个临床试验注册库(ClinicalTrials.gov和gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com)。
我们纳入了使用自行服用的对乙酰氨基酚治疗偏头痛发作的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照或活性药物对照研究,每个治疗组至少有10名参与者。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。与安慰剂或其他活性治疗相比,使用达到各结局的参与者数量来计算相对风险和治疗所需人数(NNT)或伤害所需人数(NNH)。
更新检索又识别出一项纳入研究。11项研究(2942名参与者,5109次发作)将1000mg对乙酰氨基酚单独使用或与止吐药联合使用,与安慰剂或其他活性对照药(主要是100mg舒马曲坦)进行了比较。对于所有疗效结局,对乙酰氨基酚均优于安慰剂,对于中度至重度疼痛服用药物后2小时无痛和2小时及1小时头痛缓解,NNT分别为12(对乙酰氨基酚反应率19%,安慰剂反应率10%)、5.0(对乙酰氨基酚反应率56%,安慰剂反应率36%)和5.2(对乙酰氨基酚反应率39%,安慰剂反应率20%)。1000mg对乙酰氨基酚加10mg甲氧氯普胺在2小时头痛缓解方面与口服100mg舒马曲坦无显著差异;无2小时无痛的数据。对乙酰氨基酚与安慰剂之间以及对乙酰氨基酚加甲氧氯普胺与舒马曲坦之间的不良事件发生率相似。单独使用对乙酰氨基酚未发生严重不良事件,但舒马曲坦发生的严重和/或重度不良事件多于联合治疗(NNH 32)。
1000mg对乙酰氨基酚单独使用在治疗急性偏头痛方面在统计学上优于安慰剂,但两小时无痛反应的NNT为12,不如其他常用镇痛药。鉴于对乙酰氨基酚成本低且易于获得,对于有非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)或阿司匹林禁忌证或不能耐受的患者,它可能是急性偏头痛有用的首选药物。加用10mg甲氧氯普胺可产生与口服100mg舒马曲坦相当的短期疗效。对乙酰氨基酚的不良事件与安慰剂无差异;舒马曲坦发生的严重和/或重度不良事件比对乙酰氨基酚加甲氧氯普胺略常见。