Suppr超能文献

布洛芬加或不加止吐药用于治疗成人急性偏头痛。

Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults.

作者信息

Rabbie Roy, Derry Sheena, Moore R Andrew

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD008039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008039.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 10, 2010 (Rabbie 2010). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers do not seek professional help, relying instead on over-the-counter analgesics. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce symptoms commonly associated with migraine headaches.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy and tolerability of ibuprofen, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine headaches in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Oxford Pain Relief Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists for studies through 22 April 2010 for the original review and to 14 February 2013 for the update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies using self-administered ibuprofen to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants achieving each outcome were used to calculate relative risk and number needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or other active treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

No new studies were found for this update. Nine included studies (4373 participants, 5223 attacks) compared ibuprofen with placebo or other active comparators; none combined ibuprofen with a self-administered antiemetic. All studies treated attacks with single doses of medication. For ibuprofen 400 mg versus placebo, NNTs for 2-hour pain-free (26% versus 12% with placebo), 2-hour headache relief (57% versus 25%) and 24-hour sustained headache relief (45% versus 19%) were 7.2, 3.2 and 4.0, respectively. For ibuprofen 200 mg versus placebo, NNTs for 2-hour pain-free (20% versus 10%) and 2-hour headache relief (52% versus 37%) were 9.7 and 6.3, respectively. The higher dose was significantly better than the lower dose for 2-hour headache relief. Soluble formulations of ibuprofen 400 mg were better than standard tablets for 1-hour, but not 2-hour headache relief.Similar numbers of participants experienced adverse events, which were mostly mild and transient, with ibuprofen and placebo.Ibuprofen 400 mg did not differ from rofecoxib 25 mg for 2-hour headache relief or 24-hour headache relief.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no new studies since the last version of this review. Ibuprofen is an effective treatment for acute migraine headaches, providing pain relief in about half of sufferers, but complete relief from pain and associated symptoms for only a minority. NNTs for all efficacy outcomes were better with 400 mg than 200 mg in comparisons with placebo, and soluble formulations provided more rapid relief. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, occurring at the same rate as with placebo.

摘要

背景

这是2010年第10期发表的原始综述的更新版本(拉比,2010年)。偏头痛是一种常见的致残性疾病,给个人、医疗服务机构和社会带来负担。许多患者不寻求专业帮助,而是依赖非处方镇痛药。与止吐药联合治疗应有助于减轻通常与偏头痛相关的症状。

目的

确定与安慰剂及其他活性干预措施相比,布洛芬单独使用或与止吐药联合使用治疗成人急性偏头痛的疗效和耐受性。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、牛津疼痛缓解数据库、ClinicalTrials.gov,并查阅了截至2010年4月22日的原始综述及截至2013年2月14日的更新的研究参考文献列表。

选择标准

我们纳入了使用自行服用的布洛芬治疗偏头痛发作的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照或活性对照研究,每个治疗组至少有10名参与者。

数据收集与分析

两名综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。与安慰剂或其他活性治疗相比,达到各结局的参与者数量用于计算相对危险度和治疗所需人数(NNT)或伤害所需人数(NNH)。

主要结果

本次更新未发现新的研究。纳入的9项研究(4373名参与者,5223次发作)将布洛芬与安慰剂或其他活性对照药物进行了比较;没有一项研究将布洛芬与自行服用的止吐药联合使用进行比较。所有研究均采用单剂量药物治疗发作。对于布洛芬400毫克与安慰剂比较,2小时无痛(26%对安慰剂组的12%)、2小时头痛缓解(57%对25%)和24小时持续头痛缓解(45%对19%)的NNT分别为7.2、3.2和4.0。对于布洛芬200毫克与安慰剂比较,2小时无痛(20%对10%)和2小时头痛缓解(52%对37%)的NNT分别为9.7和6.3。在2小时头痛缓解方面,高剂量组明显优于低剂量组。布洛芬400毫克的可溶制剂在1小时头痛缓解方面优于标准片剂,但在2小时头痛缓解方面则不然。布洛芬组和安慰剂组经历不良事件的参与者数量相似,不良事件大多为轻度且短暂。布洛芬400毫克在2小时头痛缓解或24小时头痛缓解方面与罗非昔布25毫克无差异。

作者结论

自本综述的上一版本以来,我们未发现新的研究。布洛芬是治疗急性偏头痛有效的药物,约一半的患者疼痛得到缓解,但只有少数患者疼痛及相关症状完全缓解。与安慰剂比较时,所有疗效结局的NNT,400毫克组优于200毫克组,且可溶制剂缓解更快。不良事件大多为轻度且短暂,发生率与安慰剂相同。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Clinical pearls for management of migraines.偏头痛管理的临床要点
Can Fam Physician. 2024 May;70(5):325-327. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7005325.

本文引用的文献

4
Migraine: the seventh disabler.偏头痛:第七大致残因素。
J Headache Pain. 2013 Jan 10;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-1.
10
The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project.欧洲头痛障碍的成本:Eurolight 项目。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 May;19(5):703-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03612.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验