Suppr超能文献

基准评估:一种促进医疗卫生领域持续质量改进的方法。

Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health.

作者信息

Ettorchi-Tardy Amina, Levif Marie, Michel Philippe

机构信息

Public Health Physician, Comité de coordination de l'évaluation clinique et de la qualité en Aquitaine (CCECQA), Hôpital Xavier Arnozan (CHU de Bordeaux), Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2012 May;7(4):e101-19.

Abstract

Benchmarking, a management approach for implementing best practices at best cost, is a recent concept in the healthcare system. The objectives of this paper are to better understand the concept and its evolution in the healthcare sector, to propose an operational definition, and to describe some French and international experiences of benchmarking in the healthcare sector. To this end, we reviewed the literature on this approach's emergence in the industrial sector, its evolution, its fields of application and examples of how it has been used in the healthcare sector. Benchmarking is often thought to consist simply of comparing indicators and is not perceived in its entirety, that is, as a tool based on voluntary and active collaboration among several organizations to create a spirit of competition and to apply best practices. The key feature of benchmarking is its integration within a comprehensive and participatory policy of continuous quality improvement (CQI). Conditions for successful benchmarking focus essentially on careful preparation of the process, monitoring of the relevant indicators, staff involvement and inter-organizational visits. Compared to methods previously implemented in France (CQI and collaborative projects), benchmarking has specific features that set it apart as a healthcare innovation. This is especially true for healthcare or medical-social organizations, as the principle of inter-organizational visiting is not part of their culture. Thus, this approach will need to be assessed for feasibility and acceptability before it is more widely promoted.

摘要

标杆管理作为一种以最优成本实施最佳实践的管理方法,是医疗保健系统中的一个新概念。本文的目的是更好地理解这一概念及其在医疗保健领域的演变,提出一个操作性定义,并描述一些法国和国际上医疗保健领域标杆管理的经验。为此,我们回顾了关于这种方法在工业部门的出现、演变、应用领域以及在医疗保健部门如何使用的文献。标杆管理通常被认为仅仅是比较指标,而没有被全面地理解,也就是说,它没有被视为一种基于多个组织之间自愿和积极合作以营造竞争精神并应用最佳实践的工具。标杆管理的关键特征在于它融入了全面且参与性的持续质量改进(CQI)政策之中。成功实施标杆管理的条件主要集中在精心准备流程、监测相关指标、员工参与以及组织间互访。与法国此前实施的方法(CQI和合作项目)相比,标杆管理具有使其区别于其他医疗创新的特定特征。对于医疗保健或医疗 - 社会机构而言尤其如此,因为组织间互访的原则并非其文化的一部分。因此,在更广泛推广这种方法之前,需要对其可行性和可接受性进行评估。

相似文献

5
All inclusive benchmarking.全括式基准测试
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Jul;14(5):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00596.x.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
[Benchmarking in health care: conclusions and recommendations].[医疗保健中的基准评估:结论与建议]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

2

本文引用的文献

1
Will benchmarking ICUs improve outcome?对重症监护病房进行基准评估会改善治疗结果吗?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Oct;15(5):450-5. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833079fb.
4
International benchmarking. Option or illusion?国际标杆管理:是选择还是幻想?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Jun;21(3):151-2. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp001. Epub 2009 Feb 1.
6
Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review.质量改进协作影响的证据:系统评价
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1491-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
7
[Healthcare quality is not so new: the benchmarking case].[医疗质量并非新鲜事物:标杆管理案例]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008 Jun;27(6):467-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
8
Quality management and benchmarking in emergency medicine.急诊医学中的质量管理与基准评估
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Apr;21(2):233-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f5d8eb.
10
Essence of Care and the pressure ulcer benchmark--an evaluation.《护理精髓与压疮基准——一项评估》
J Tissue Viability. 2008 May;17(2):44-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验